all. “We are never asked for what we really need <strong>and</strong> want.”When asked about time spent <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>structional dialogue withsupervisors or fellow teachers, he replies, “My pr<strong>in</strong>cipal does talkwith me but not about teach<strong>in</strong>g; he loves basketball <strong>and</strong> he knowsI do too, so when meet all we talk about is the latest game or theMiami Heat’s LeBron James.”Extant research <strong>and</strong> anecdotal evidence <strong>in</strong>dicates that many<strong>Jewish</strong> schools have been unaffected by these recent cutt<strong>in</strong>g-edgepractices <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>structional leadership (Feuerman, 2002, 2009;Gorsetman, 2005; Greene, 2008; Schick, 2007; Spotlight on <strong>Jewish</strong> <strong>Day</strong>School Education, 2003). 3 For <strong>in</strong>stance, supervision of <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong>many <strong>Jewish</strong> schools is performed perfunctorily, utiliz<strong>in</strong>g traditionalmethods of evaluative supervision <strong>and</strong> episodic utilization ofprofessional development. Research <strong>in</strong>dicates that such practices donot encourage change <strong>in</strong> teacher behavior that results <strong>in</strong> studentachievement (e. g., Firth & Pajak, 1998; Glanz, Shulman, & Sullivan,2007; Glickman, Gordon, Ross-Gordon, 2008). A major purpose of thismonograph is to br<strong>in</strong>g this current supervisory technology to <strong>Jewish</strong>day schools <strong>in</strong> order to underscore the vital role of pr<strong>in</strong>cipals <strong>and</strong>heads of school as primary <strong>in</strong>structional leaders who are charged,above all else, with promot<strong>in</strong>g student learn<strong>in</strong>g (academic, social,<strong>in</strong>terpersonal, etc.). The rema<strong>in</strong>der of this Introduction will addressthe follow<strong>in</strong>g topics:(1) essential assumptions about <strong>in</strong>structional leadership(2) key tasks of successful <strong>in</strong>structional leaders(3) vital aspects of <strong>in</strong>structional supervision with<strong>in</strong> a professionallearn<strong>in</strong>g community(4) necessary theoretical frameworks for support<strong>in</strong>g efforts toenhance <strong>in</strong>structional quality(5) noteworthy commitments of <strong>Jewish</strong> day school leaders toproactively promote teacher qualityThe follow<strong>in</strong>g assumptions, drawn from extant research <strong>in</strong> schoolsupervision <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>structional leadership, underscore the importance<strong>and</strong> vitality of <strong>in</strong>structional leadership:4
• The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal is the key player <strong>in</strong> the school build<strong>in</strong>g topromote student learn<strong>in</strong>g. It's not that students cannot learnwithout a pr<strong>in</strong>cipal for teachers are certa<strong>in</strong>ly most essential asfront-l<strong>in</strong>e educators <strong>in</strong> the classroom (Lieberman & Friedrich,2010). But, a specially-tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>structional leader serv<strong>in</strong>g asbuild<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>cipal (or head of school) is vital <strong>in</strong> order toaccomplish deep, susta<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>and</strong> school-wide achievement forall students (Leithwood, Seashore Louis, Anderson, &Wahlstrom, 2004; L<strong>in</strong>dstrom & Speck, 2004; Waters,Marzano, & McNulty, 2003; Zepeda, 2007). 4• High achievement for all students should be the major goal fora pr<strong>in</strong>cipal. A pr<strong>in</strong>cipal may possess charisma, <strong>in</strong>creaseparental participation <strong>in</strong> school activities, raise funds for thePTA, <strong>in</strong>teract well with the Board, organize mean<strong>in</strong>gfulcultural events, or even possess great vision. However, thebottom l<strong>in</strong>e is that a pr<strong>in</strong>cipal first <strong>and</strong> foremost should beconcerned <strong>in</strong> activities that actively promote good teach<strong>in</strong>gthat <strong>in</strong> turn promotes student learn<strong>in</strong>g. A pr<strong>in</strong>cipal cannot beconsidered successful unless high student achievement <strong>in</strong>academic areas is achieved for all students (Brown, 2008;Cotton, 2003; Murphy, 2002; Pajak, 2006; Reeves, 2002;Scheurich & Skrla, 2003; Waters, Marzano, & McNulty, 2003).• Although other forms of leadership (i.e., cultural, managerial,human resources, strategic, external development, <strong>and</strong> micropolitical)are important (Mid-Cont<strong>in</strong>ent Research forEducation <strong>and</strong> Learn<strong>in</strong>g (MCREL), 2001; Waters & Grub,2004), <strong>in</strong>structional leadership can never be simply delegatedto others. 5 Others serve as <strong>in</strong>structional leaders for certa<strong>in</strong>, butthe pr<strong>in</strong>cipal plays an active <strong>and</strong> orchestrat<strong>in</strong>g role (Catano &Stronge, 2006).• The effective pr<strong>in</strong>cipal is knowledgeable <strong>and</strong> skillful <strong>in</strong> the art<strong>and</strong> science of <strong>in</strong>structional supervision <strong>and</strong> leadership(Marzano & Brown, 2009). 6Vignette: I recall my first several years of teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an urbanelementary school. The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal had an excellent reputation as an5
- Page 1 and 2: Improving InstructionalQuality in J
- Page 4 and 5: Appendix C: Assessing Your Role as
- Page 6 and 7: others, involved in a cognate enter
- Page 8 and 9: Weissberg, Walberg, & Wang., 2004).
- Page 12 and 13: administrator. He was well-organize
- Page 14 and 15: Sartoris, DiPrima Bickel, & Garnier
- Page 16 and 17: grade conferences, etc., effective
- Page 18 and 19: school’s teaching practices, the
- Page 20 and 21: een made in the areas of science an
- Page 22 and 23: learning is more likely to occur th
- Page 24 and 25: content, and the need to ensure tha
- Page 26 and 27: pattern.] I didn’t really realize
- Page 28 and 29: constraints, increase in administra
- Page 30 and 31: The Transformational Change Project
- Page 32 and 33: that are not strategic, but episodi
- Page 34 and 35: my personal involvement in work wit
- Page 36 and 37: schools to even greater levels of s
- Page 38 and 39: was: “Well, you know, finding tim
- Page 40 and 41: called direct teaching), although e
- Page 42 and 43: surprised when no one can answer
- Page 44 and 45: RecommendationsI. Teaching1. Teache
- Page 46 and 47: standards,” a significant opportu
- Page 48 and 49: decide on an area or theme they’d
- Page 50 and 51: • Reflective journaling - Another
- Page 52 and 53: 3. Deep instructional improvement v
- Page 54 and 55: Instructional leadership is about e
- Page 56 and 57: 76). Teachers who employ instructio
- Page 58 and 59: short answers to two questions. The
- Page 60 and 61:
may become involved in cooperative
- Page 62 and 63:
utilized within a differentiated le
- Page 64 and 65:
Research-Based Teaching Practices i
- Page 66 and 67:
curriculum? Schools, in my view, to
- Page 68 and 69:
learning objectives have been ident
- Page 70 and 71:
Developing curriculum at the planni
- Page 72 and 73:
4) Emphasize both the academic and
- Page 74 and 75:
An Overview of Best Practices in Su
- Page 76 and 77:
with practices best suited to promo
- Page 78 and 79:
dialogue and meaningful supervision
- Page 80 and 81:
• Ongoing - Too much of professio
- Page 82 and 83:
to do so. In fact, utilizing in-sch
- Page 84 and 85:
greatly to meaningful supervision a
- Page 86 and 87:
and amplified by James MacGregor Bu
- Page 88 and 89:
Leadership is predicated on the fou
- Page 90 and 91:
Citing Jim Collins (2002 cited by F
- Page 92 and 93:
Notes1. Before continuing, I sugges
- Page 94 and 95:
ubric of “professional developmen
- Page 96 and 97:
throughs, explains that according t
- Page 98 and 99:
members are not fully cognizant or
- Page 100 and 101:
AcknowledgementsI thank all the ind
- Page 102 and 103:
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and
- Page 104 and 105:
Burke, P. J., & Krey, R. D. (2005).
- Page 106 and 107:
Downey, C. J., Steffy, B. E., Posto
- Page 108 and 109:
Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and s
- Page 110 and 111:
Good, T., & Brophy, J. E. (2007). L
- Page 112 and 113:
Johnson, C. C., & Fargo, J. D. (201
- Page 114 and 115:
Marzano, R. J., & Brown, J. L. (200
- Page 116 and 117:
Popham, W. J. (2008a). Classroom as
- Page 118 and 119:
Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2009). Isr
- Page 120 and 121:
Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P.
- Page 122 and 123:
Annotated Works on Instructional Le
- Page 124 and 125:
This volume is an inspiring introdu
- Page 126 and 127:
you want to learn how to teach stud
- Page 128 and 129:
AppendicesAppendix A: Instructional
- Page 130 and 131:
Suggested responses:1. To be effect
- Page 132 and 133:
Appendix C: Assessing Your Role as
- Page 134 and 135:
SA A D SD 3. My spoken language as
- Page 136 and 137:
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
- Page 138 and 139:
SA A D SD 13. I have a well-defined
- Page 140 and 141:
SA A D SD 13. I rarely desire to se
- Page 142 and 143:
20. This is a well managed school.
- Page 144 and 145:
Appendix F: Teacher Attitude Questi
- Page 146:
41. My colleagues and I usually dis