called direct teach<strong>in</strong>g), although employed <strong>in</strong> a differentiatedclassroom, is m<strong>in</strong>imized. The need for educat<strong>in</strong>g teachers <strong>in</strong>differentiated <strong>in</strong>struction is axiomatic (Benjam<strong>in</strong>, 2002, 2003; George,2005; Glanz, 2008; Gregory & Chapman, 2002; Toml<strong>in</strong>son, 2003).Educat<strong>in</strong>g teachers <strong>in</strong> differentiated <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusivepractices <strong>in</strong> order that they learn best how to meet the needs of allability levels with<strong>in</strong> the same classroom is similarly axiomatic(Alvarado, 1998; Hedrick, 2005; Reis, McCoach, Little, Muller, &Kaniskan, 2011; Toml<strong>in</strong>son, 2001, 2005; Wormeli, 2005). 17Parenthetically, yet very importantly <strong>and</strong> that is why I <strong>in</strong>sertthese next three <strong>in</strong>cidents <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> body of the monograph, thereis a widely-held view about teach<strong>in</strong>g that needs debunk<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> is aprimary motive for writ<strong>in</strong>g this monograph.Incident number one: In the course of writ<strong>in</strong>g this monograph, Imet a rabbi, defend<strong>in</strong>g the “sage on the stage” modality of teach<strong>in</strong>g,who expla<strong>in</strong>ed to me that when he was a talmid of some esteemedwell-known rav, the rav once queried why he was always so quiet <strong>in</strong>class. The rabbi responded, “My parents pay a lot <strong>in</strong> tuition so that Ishould listen <strong>and</strong> learn, <strong>and</strong> not to speak but rather to hear thebrilliance of the Rav expound.” This story was related, I presume, tosupport the rabbi’s use of direct teach<strong>in</strong>g with little audienceparticipation. I do not deny the import of the “sage on the stage”manner of presentation; it’s just not teach<strong>in</strong>g. To “teach” implies thatstudents are learn<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> most students cannot learn without direct<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>and</strong> active engagement between teacher <strong>and</strong> student,student <strong>and</strong> student, <strong>and</strong> student <strong>and</strong> text. (See the <strong>Instructional</strong> Core<strong>in</strong> Figure 2 earlier <strong>in</strong> the monograph.) Moreover, if the “sage” or“presenter” does not check for student underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g then the processmay be called anyth<strong>in</strong>g but teach<strong>in</strong>g. A m<strong>in</strong>ority of talmidim canlearn from a “sage on the stage” approach, but most learners simplycannot. Parenthetically, I do appreciate those who might argue or, atleast, posit that a rav might speak above the comprehension levels ofthe audience <strong>in</strong> order to affect their neshamot. I once heard fromsomeone that the Rosh Yeshiva of Telshe once said, “Why should Iaim my address to their present <strong>in</strong>tellectual level when I can try to34
stimulate them to realize their full potential by speak<strong>in</strong>g to theirnoble, lofty souls?”Incident number two: I was recently asked to participate <strong>in</strong> a“phenomenal” shiur. Admittedly, I have not attended a shiur <strong>in</strong> yearsbecause I can no longer learn by simply listen<strong>in</strong>g; I need to beengaged <strong>and</strong> challenged. I was <strong>in</strong>formed that this shiur would <strong>in</strong>deedbe engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> challeng<strong>in</strong>g. After <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g his audience of ten tofifteen baalei batim that they would be learn<strong>in</strong>g masekhet MoedKattan, the rabbi cont<strong>in</strong>ued to expla<strong>in</strong> that we would be learn<strong>in</strong>g thetext, Rashi, Tosafot, Mishnah Berurah, etc. There was no preassessmentmade of the skill level of the audience. For manyparticipants, learn<strong>in</strong>g Tosafot was well beyond their skill level,although I do underst<strong>and</strong> that “talk<strong>in</strong>g out” a Tosafot may beappeal<strong>in</strong>g to some <strong>in</strong>dividuals. I then decided not to attend anothershiur when the rabbi, who was most articulate <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g, expla<strong>in</strong>edthat we needed to review the material, that dur<strong>in</strong>g the week weshould f<strong>in</strong>d a havruta to do so, <strong>and</strong> that he would answer anyquestions the follow<strong>in</strong>g week. The rabbi proceeded to speak for thenext 45 m<strong>in</strong>utes occasionally address<strong>in</strong>g a question from the audience.Although the speaker was competent <strong>in</strong> the material <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gto listen to, I walked away with little <strong>in</strong>formation I could reta<strong>in</strong>. Ofcourse, I noticed a few baalei batim engag<strong>in</strong>g the proverbial practiceof “nodd<strong>in</strong>g off.” Many of our talmidim <strong>and</strong> rabbeim <strong>in</strong> yeshivot,exposed to such frontal teach<strong>in</strong>g practices, tend to th<strong>in</strong>k that is theway all students learn. We teach as we were taught. No wonder, then,that a student teacher I was observ<strong>in</strong>g work<strong>in</strong>g with a group of 9 thgraders while employ<strong>in</strong>g the same directive teach<strong>in</strong>g methods, wassurprised to f<strong>in</strong>d few, if any students engaged <strong>in</strong> the lesson!Incident number three: I received this email message from asemikhah student while writ<strong>in</strong>g this monograph; it is quite startl<strong>in</strong>g:“I face a huge frustration; My m<strong>in</strong>d is generally <strong>in</strong> the pedagogicm<strong>in</strong>dset, always th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g what way there is to enhance education, . . .However, I then sit <strong>in</strong> shiur. . . <strong>and</strong> I am lost half the time, <strong>and</strong> threequartersof the shiur are unresponsive. The rabbi, however, might talkor expla<strong>in</strong> someth<strong>in</strong>g for about 45 m<strong>in</strong>utes to an hour, <strong>and</strong> then asks‘okay, any questions?’ ‘No, okay, great, let’s go on.’ Later, he is35
- Page 1 and 2: Improving InstructionalQuality in J
- Page 4 and 5: Appendix C: Assessing Your Role as
- Page 6 and 7: others, involved in a cognate enter
- Page 8 and 9: Weissberg, Walberg, & Wang., 2004).
- Page 10 and 11: all. “We are never asked for what
- Page 12 and 13: administrator. He was well-organize
- Page 14 and 15: Sartoris, DiPrima Bickel, & Garnier
- Page 16 and 17: grade conferences, etc., effective
- Page 18 and 19: school’s teaching practices, the
- Page 20 and 21: een made in the areas of science an
- Page 22 and 23: learning is more likely to occur th
- Page 24 and 25: content, and the need to ensure tha
- Page 26 and 27: pattern.] I didn’t really realize
- Page 28 and 29: constraints, increase in administra
- Page 30 and 31: The Transformational Change Project
- Page 32 and 33: that are not strategic, but episodi
- Page 34 and 35: my personal involvement in work wit
- Page 36 and 37: schools to even greater levels of s
- Page 38 and 39: was: “Well, you know, finding tim
- Page 42 and 43: surprised when no one can answer
- Page 44 and 45: RecommendationsI. Teaching1. Teache
- Page 46 and 47: standards,” a significant opportu
- Page 48 and 49: decide on an area or theme they’d
- Page 50 and 51: • Reflective journaling - Another
- Page 52 and 53: 3. Deep instructional improvement v
- Page 54 and 55: Instructional leadership is about e
- Page 56 and 57: 76). Teachers who employ instructio
- Page 58 and 59: short answers to two questions. The
- Page 60 and 61: may become involved in cooperative
- Page 62 and 63: utilized within a differentiated le
- Page 64 and 65: Research-Based Teaching Practices i
- Page 66 and 67: curriculum? Schools, in my view, to
- Page 68 and 69: learning objectives have been ident
- Page 70 and 71: Developing curriculum at the planni
- Page 72 and 73: 4) Emphasize both the academic and
- Page 74 and 75: An Overview of Best Practices in Su
- Page 76 and 77: with practices best suited to promo
- Page 78 and 79: dialogue and meaningful supervision
- Page 80 and 81: • Ongoing - Too much of professio
- Page 82 and 83: to do so. In fact, utilizing in-sch
- Page 84 and 85: greatly to meaningful supervision a
- Page 86 and 87: and amplified by James MacGregor Bu
- Page 88 and 89: Leadership is predicated on the fou
- Page 90 and 91:
Citing Jim Collins (2002 cited by F
- Page 92 and 93:
Notes1. Before continuing, I sugges
- Page 94 and 95:
ubric of “professional developmen
- Page 96 and 97:
throughs, explains that according t
- Page 98 and 99:
members are not fully cognizant or
- Page 100 and 101:
AcknowledgementsI thank all the ind
- Page 102 and 103:
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and
- Page 104 and 105:
Burke, P. J., & Krey, R. D. (2005).
- Page 106 and 107:
Downey, C. J., Steffy, B. E., Posto
- Page 108 and 109:
Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and s
- Page 110 and 111:
Good, T., & Brophy, J. E. (2007). L
- Page 112 and 113:
Johnson, C. C., & Fargo, J. D. (201
- Page 114 and 115:
Marzano, R. J., & Brown, J. L. (200
- Page 116 and 117:
Popham, W. J. (2008a). Classroom as
- Page 118 and 119:
Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2009). Isr
- Page 120 and 121:
Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P.
- Page 122 and 123:
Annotated Works on Instructional Le
- Page 124 and 125:
This volume is an inspiring introdu
- Page 126 and 127:
you want to learn how to teach stud
- Page 128 and 129:
AppendicesAppendix A: Instructional
- Page 130 and 131:
Suggested responses:1. To be effect
- Page 132 and 133:
Appendix C: Assessing Your Role as
- Page 134 and 135:
SA A D SD 3. My spoken language as
- Page 136 and 137:
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
- Page 138 and 139:
SA A D SD 13. I have a well-defined
- Page 140 and 141:
SA A D SD 13. I rarely desire to se
- Page 142 and 143:
20. This is a well managed school.
- Page 144 and 145:
Appendix F: Teacher Attitude Questi
- Page 146:
41. My colleagues and I usually dis