Improving Instructional Quality in Jewish Day Schools and Yeshivot ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2009). Israeli teachers’ perceptions ofmentoring effectiveness. The International Journal of Educational Management,23(5), 390-420.Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching.Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12-16.Shulman, V., Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2008). The New York City schoolreform: Consequences for supervision of instruction. International Journal ofLeadership in Education, 11(4), 407-425.Simmons, B. (1987). Characteristics of a good teacher. In G. W. Thomas& D. G. Ferguson (Eds.), Celebration of the teacher (pp. 11-16). Las Cruces, NewMexico: New Mexico State University.Skolnick Moskowitz, N. (1998). A framework for strengtheningcurriculum in Jewish educational settings. In R. E. Tornberg (Ed.), The Jewisheducational leader’s handbook (pp. 188-211). Denver, CO: A.R.E. Publishing.Slattery, P. (2006). Curriculum development in the postmodern era.New York: Routledge.Slavin, R.E. (2008). Educational psychology: Theory and practice.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Smylie, M. A. (2009). Continuous school improvement. Thousand Oaks,CA: Corwin.Sokolow, M. (2009). A philosophical-ideological platform for modernOrthodox education. Conversations: The Journal of the Institute for Jewish Ideasand Ideals, 4, 5-8.Soloveitchik, J.B. (1979). Reflections of the Rav (A. Besdin, Ed.).Jerusalem: World Zionist Organization.Spearman, M. (2009). O.L. Davis, Jr., and the history of teachereducation. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 11(1/2), 53-59.Speck, M. (1998). The principalship: Building a learning community.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Spotlight on Jewish day school education. (2003). New York: JewishEducation Services of North America.Squires, D. A., Huitt, W. G., & Segars, J. K. (1984). Effective schools andclassrooms: A research-based perspective. Alexandria, VA: Association forSupervision and Curriculum Development.Starratt, R. J. (1995). Leaders with vision: The quest for school renewal.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.112
Stepanek, J., Appel, G., Leong, M., Turner Mangan, M., & Mitchell, M.(2007). Leading lesson study: A practical guide for teachers and facilitators.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Stevens, R. (1912). The question as a measure of efficiency ininstruction: A critical study of classroom practice. New York: Teachers College,Columbia University, Contributions to Education, No. 48.Stodolsky, S. S. (1981). The recitation persists, but what does it looklike? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(2), 121-130.Stronge, J.H. (2007). Qualities of effective teaching (2 nd ed.). Alexandria,VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Sullivan, S. (1999). Cycles of reflective practice: Building a sense ofefficacy in the classroom supervisor. Educational Leadership and Administration,11, 35-45.Sullivan, S. (2006). Monitoring under the guise of reflective practice.Supervision and Instructional Leadership AERA SIG Newsletter, pp. 2-3.Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2006). Building effective learning communities:Strategies for leadership, learning, and collaboration. Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2009). Supervision that improves teaching andlearning: Strategies and techniques (3 rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Sullivan, S., & Shulman, V. (2005). Managing change: Thesuperintendent as line director of instruction. International Journal of Leadershipin Education, 8(2), 123-144.Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. (2006). Curriculum development: Theory intopractice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Thayer, V. T. (1928). The passing of the recitation. Boston: D. C. Heath.Tomlinson, C. (2001). Differentiated instruction in the regularclassroom: What does it mean? How does it look? Understanding Our Gifted,14(1), 3-6.Tomlinson, C. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiatedclassroom. Alexandria, VA: Supervision and Curriculum Development.Tomlinson, C. (2005). This issue. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 183-184.Trusedale, W. (2009). Peer coaching on transferability of staffdevelopment. Saarbruken, Germany: LAP – Lambert Academic Publishing.113
Page 1 and 2:
Improving InstructionalQuality in J
Page 4 and 5:
Appendix C: Assessing Your Role as
Page 6 and 7:
others, involved in a cognate enter
Page 8 and 9:
Weissberg, Walberg, & Wang., 2004).
Page 10 and 11:
all. “We are never asked for what
Page 12 and 13:
administrator. He was well-organize
Page 14 and 15:
Sartoris, DiPrima Bickel, & Garnier
Page 16 and 17:
grade conferences, etc., effective
Page 18 and 19:
school’s teaching practices, the
Page 20 and 21:
een made in the areas of science an
Page 22 and 23:
learning is more likely to occur th
Page 24 and 25:
content, and the need to ensure tha
Page 26 and 27:
pattern.] I didn’t really realize
Page 28 and 29:
constraints, increase in administra
Page 30 and 31:
The Transformational Change Project
Page 32 and 33:
that are not strategic, but episodi
Page 34 and 35:
my personal involvement in work wit
Page 36 and 37:
schools to even greater levels of s
Page 38 and 39:
was: “Well, you know, finding tim
Page 40 and 41:
called direct teaching), although e
Page 42 and 43:
surprised when no one can answer
Page 44 and 45:
RecommendationsI. Teaching1. Teache
Page 46 and 47:
standards,” a significant opportu
Page 48 and 49:
decide on an area or theme they’d
Page 50 and 51:
• Reflective journaling - Another
Page 52 and 53:
3. Deep instructional improvement v
Page 54 and 55:
Instructional leadership is about e
Page 56 and 57:
76). Teachers who employ instructio
Page 58 and 59:
short answers to two questions. The
Page 60 and 61:
may become involved in cooperative
Page 62 and 63:
utilized within a differentiated le
Page 64 and 65:
Research-Based Teaching Practices i
Page 66 and 67:
curriculum? Schools, in my view, to
Page 68 and 69: learning objectives have been ident
Page 70 and 71: Developing curriculum at the planni
Page 72 and 73: 4) Emphasize both the academic and
Page 74 and 75: An Overview of Best Practices in Su
Page 76 and 77: with practices best suited to promo
Page 78 and 79: dialogue and meaningful supervision
Page 80 and 81: • Ongoing - Too much of professio
Page 82 and 83: to do so. In fact, utilizing in-sch
Page 84 and 85: greatly to meaningful supervision a
Page 86 and 87: and amplified by James MacGregor Bu
Page 88 and 89: Leadership is predicated on the fou
Page 90 and 91: Citing Jim Collins (2002 cited by F
Page 92 and 93: Notes1. Before continuing, I sugges
Page 94 and 95: ubric of “professional developmen
Page 96 and 97: throughs, explains that according t
Page 98 and 99: members are not fully cognizant or
Page 100 and 101: AcknowledgementsI thank all the ind
Page 102 and 103: Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and
Page 104 and 105: Burke, P. J., & Krey, R. D. (2005).
Page 106 and 107: Downey, C. J., Steffy, B. E., Posto
Page 108 and 109: Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and s
Page 110 and 111: Good, T., & Brophy, J. E. (2007). L
Page 112 and 113: Johnson, C. C., & Fargo, J. D. (201
Page 114 and 115: Marzano, R. J., & Brown, J. L. (200
Page 116 and 117: Popham, W. J. (2008a). Classroom as
Page 120 and 121: Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P.
Page 122 and 123: Annotated Works on Instructional Le
Page 124 and 125: This volume is an inspiring introdu
Page 126 and 127: you want to learn how to teach stud
Page 128 and 129: AppendicesAppendix A: Instructional
Page 130 and 131: Suggested responses:1. To be effect
Page 132 and 133: Appendix C: Assessing Your Role as
Page 134 and 135: SA A D SD 3. My spoken language as
Page 136 and 137: Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
Page 138 and 139: SA A D SD 13. I have a well-defined
Page 140 and 141: SA A D SD 13. I rarely desire to se
Page 142 and 143: 20. This is a well managed school.
Page 144 and 145: Appendix F: Teacher Attitude Questi
Page 146: 41. My colleagues and I usually dis
show all

Improving Instructional Quality in Jewish Day Schools and Yeshivot ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?