12.07.2015 Views

Contesting Workplace Discrimination in Court - American Bar ...

Contesting Workplace Discrimination in Court - American Bar ...

Contesting Workplace Discrimination in Court - American Bar ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TYPE-ISSUE COMBINATIONSAn important question <strong>in</strong> EDL cases is whether discrim<strong>in</strong>ation based on particular employee characteristics tends to align withparticular issue claims. For example, is unlawful fir<strong>in</strong>g more of a problem <strong>in</strong> race, as opposed to sex or age cases? Are claims ofdiscrim<strong>in</strong>atory promotion more prevalent <strong>in</strong> sex cases than <strong>in</strong> disability cases? Although formal tests of statistical significance arenecessary to answer such questions, the data nonetheless reveal—<strong>in</strong> a general sense—substantial uniformity <strong>in</strong> the breakdownof cases by type and issue. With just two exceptions, race, sex, age, disability, and national orig<strong>in</strong> cases follow a strik<strong>in</strong>gly similarpattern <strong>in</strong> the proportion of issue claims: unlawful fir<strong>in</strong>g is the most prevalent, followed (<strong>in</strong> order) by claims of discrim<strong>in</strong>atoryretaliation, promotion, pay, and hir<strong>in</strong>g. Figure 2.8 shows that the one major exception to this pattern is sex cases, <strong>in</strong> which theproportion of retaliation claims (54 percent of all sex cases) is slightly higher than that for fir<strong>in</strong>g claims (50 percent). In broadterms, this suggests that there exists a consistent hierarchy <strong>in</strong> the frequency of claims about unlawful employer practices.Moreover, discrim<strong>in</strong>atory fir<strong>in</strong>g and employer retaliation are, by substantial marg<strong>in</strong>s, the two greatest concerns of all pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs,regardless of their race, sex, age, disability, or national orig<strong>in</strong>.figure 2.8 :percent of cases by selectedtype-issue comb<strong>in</strong>ationsfir<strong>in</strong>gretaliationpromotionpayhir<strong>in</strong>g-8-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!