12.07.2015 Views

Reindustrialization in USA - Euler Hermes

Reindustrialization in USA - Euler Hermes

Reindustrialization in USA - Euler Hermes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Economic Outlook n° 1187 | Special Report | The <strong>Re<strong>in</strong>dustrialization</strong> of the United States<strong>Euler</strong> <strong>Hermes</strong>A new era of manufactur<strong>in</strong>g: “on-shor<strong>in</strong>g”The Ch<strong>in</strong>ese competitive edge <strong>in</strong> laborcosts has been so overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g that itoften eclipsed all other parameters <strong>in</strong> theeconomic and strategic equation. Therefreshed set of parameters of “Made <strong>in</strong>America” (cheap energy, supply cha<strong>in</strong> riskmanagement, etc.), are major advantagesto on-shor<strong>in</strong>g. Other factors <strong>in</strong>cludequality, easier communication, faster timeto market and cheaper <strong>in</strong>ventory costs.u While real American labor costs have barelychanged over the past decade, the dramatic <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese wages has resulted <strong>in</strong> a steady erosion ofthe gap between American and Ch<strong>in</strong>ese wages. Forthe previous two decades this gap had been a crucial<strong>in</strong>centive for U.S. manufacturers to relocate <strong>in</strong>dustrialfacilities to Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Although there is no doubtthat the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese competitive edge is likely to rema<strong>in</strong>significant for a while, the recent years have markeda tipp<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustrial relationship betweenthe two countries where<strong>in</strong> the wage gap will shr<strong>in</strong>kenough to become less important.Figure 14 below po<strong>in</strong>ts to a sharp <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>esewages, fueled by buoyant economic growth despitethe determ<strong>in</strong>ation to keep <strong>in</strong>flation low, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>a sharp clos<strong>in</strong>g of the wage gap. Comb<strong>in</strong>ed with thedepreciation of the U.S. dollar versus the Ch<strong>in</strong>eseyuan, the supremacy of Ch<strong>in</strong>a as the best locationto manufacture is likely to be weakened <strong>in</strong> any case.The current and foreseeable global environment maypave the way toward the on-shor<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>dustrialcapacities <strong>in</strong> the U.S. We assume the on-shor<strong>in</strong>g ofmanufactur<strong>in</strong>g capacities will ma<strong>in</strong>ly affect produc‐tion currently based <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a but aimed at the U.S.market. This trend does not imply that the U.S. companieswill automatically scale back their operations<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.The sectors expected to be the most proactive <strong>in</strong>on-shor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the short and medium term can becharacterized by two conditions:• high exposure to labor costs <strong>in</strong> their coststructure; and• the ability to absorb higher labor costs by hav<strong>in</strong>ga lower labor cost component of value-added.Table D and Figure 15 below summarize the first andsecond tier of sectors which would <strong>in</strong>itially participateand contribute to on-shor<strong>in</strong>g. The activity potentiallyaffected by on-shor<strong>in</strong>g these <strong>in</strong>dustries from Ch<strong>in</strong>a tothe U.S. would be equal to the current exports to theU.S. from Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> these two <strong>in</strong>dustries. This amountis estimated to be $282 billion annually. ©D. The Candidates for On-shor<strong>in</strong>gTier 1: Four sectors represent<strong>in</strong>g 56% of the U.S.imports from Ch<strong>in</strong>aComputer and electronic product manufactur<strong>in</strong>gU.S. import from Ch<strong>in</strong>a (<strong>in</strong> 2011)Mach<strong>in</strong>eryFurnitureMiscellaneous product manufactur<strong>in</strong>gTier 2: The ChallengersFabricated metal product manufactur<strong>in</strong>gElectrical equipment and appliancePlastic and rubber productsNon-metallic m<strong>in</strong>eral productsSource: Bureau of Economic Analysis, <strong>Euler</strong> <strong>Hermes</strong>$146bn$21bn$15bn$36bn$17bn$29bn$12bn$6bn14. Effective Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Wage Gap302520$7USCh<strong>in</strong>a15. Part of labor costs <strong>in</strong> total operat<strong>in</strong>g costs and part of the value consumed by thelabor costs for each manufactur<strong>in</strong>g sector <strong>in</strong> 2011, <strong>in</strong> %0.70.60.50.40.31510$170.20.100 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 150200620072008200920102011assumptions:wages and yuan grow at historical rate 2006-19US worker 3.4X as productiveSource: Federal Reserve, Bureau of Labor Statistics, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Labor andSocial Security of Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Boston Consult<strong>in</strong>g Group and <strong>Euler</strong> <strong>Hermes</strong>2012201320142015Wood product Non-metallic product Primary metalFabricated metal productMach<strong>in</strong>eryComputer andElectrical equipment Motor vehicleelectronicOther transportationequipmentFurnitureMiscellaneousmanufactur<strong>in</strong>gFood and beverageTextileApparel Paper Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gPetroleum andcoal productChemical Plastics and rubber L<strong>in</strong>chp<strong>in</strong> (median)Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, <strong>Euler</strong> <strong>Hermes</strong>17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!