12.07.2015 Views

Reindustrialization in USA - Euler Hermes

Reindustrialization in USA - Euler Hermes

Reindustrialization in USA - Euler Hermes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Economic Outlook n° 1187 | Special Report | The <strong>Re<strong>in</strong>dustrialization</strong> of the United States<strong>Euler</strong> <strong>Hermes</strong>therefore offers some stability to U.S. exports. Mexicois the next largest importer of U.S. goods, consum<strong>in</strong>gabout 14% of all U.S. exports. Unlike much of the worlds<strong>in</strong>ce the recession ended <strong>in</strong> 2009 Mexico has enjoyedsteady and strong growth, with robust annual GDPgrowth of 4.6% versus a long-term average of 2.7%,clearly bod<strong>in</strong>g well for future U.S. exports. Centraland South America absorb 11% of U.S. exports, andprospects for cont<strong>in</strong>ued strength <strong>in</strong> these emerg<strong>in</strong>geconomies are good. Ch<strong>in</strong>a absorbs 7% of U.S. exports,and the long-term growth of the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese economy isexpected to rema<strong>in</strong> very strong, despite a recent softpatch. Asia (ex-Ch<strong>in</strong>a and ex-Japan) consumes 13%of exports and like Lat<strong>in</strong> America, growth <strong>in</strong> theseemerg<strong>in</strong>g economies is likely to be robust. Togetherthese major, strong markets buy 64% of U.S. exports.Europe is of course a weak spot and may be for sometime, but exports to the European Monetary Unioncomprise only 13% of total U.S. exports. Furthermore,the Fed’s quantitative eas<strong>in</strong>g policies have devaluedthe dollar, mak<strong>in</strong>g export prices cheaper and boost<strong>in</strong>gtheir competitiveness. Between the end of 2009 andAugust 2012, exports from the U.S. have risen 45%,a 15% annualized rate compared to the long-termaverage of 7.8%. ©Another positive sign for the<strong>in</strong>dustrial fabric: <strong>in</strong>solvencieson the decreaseAs shown <strong>in</strong> Figures 4 and 5, bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>solvencieshave overall been on a slightly downward trend overthe past decade. Insolvencies rose as the economydeteriorated through 2007, and <strong>in</strong>creased further<strong>in</strong> 2008. Insolvencies often are a lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicator,as they were when they fell sharply <strong>in</strong> 2009 as therecession came to an end. By that time, most of thevulnerable bus<strong>in</strong>esses had already failed, and thosethat survived had done so by:• reduc<strong>in</strong>g debt on their balance sheets,• becom<strong>in</strong>g more risk-averse by not extend<strong>in</strong>g asmuch risky credit to other bus<strong>in</strong>esses, and• by reduc<strong>in</strong>g headcount.These factors allowed bus<strong>in</strong>esses to survive eventhough they put a weight on the economy which hasyet to be fully removed.4. Bankruptcies<strong>in</strong> millions300002500020000150001000050000198119831985198719891991Sources: Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Office of the U.S. Court, <strong>Euler</strong> <strong>Hermes</strong>1993199519971999200120032005Bankruptcies2007200920112013Look<strong>in</strong>g at 2013, expectations are that the downwardtrend <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>solvencies will cont<strong>in</strong>ue. We expectthe decrease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>solvencies to be 10% <strong>in</strong> 2012 and6% <strong>in</strong> 2013. This will happen for two reasons: first,GDP growth <strong>in</strong> 2013 is forecast to be around 2%. Thisshould suffice to help decrease the number of <strong>in</strong>solvencies<strong>in</strong> the economy. Secondly, bus<strong>in</strong>esses are stilloperat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the risk-averse manner which helpedthem survive the recession. They are carry<strong>in</strong>g lowerdebt levels on their balance sheets, provid<strong>in</strong>g themmore of a cushion should there be another downturn.And they are still runn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a very lean modeby keep<strong>in</strong>g operational costs and payrolls as tight aspossible.5. Insolvencies to Decrease <strong>in</strong> the Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Sectorannual change, <strong>in</strong> %2.01.81.61.41.21.00.80.60.4Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g tends to be more sensitive to thebus<strong>in</strong>ess cycle as Figure 5 clearly shows, and as suchtends to be riskier as well. Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>solvenciesrose more sharply than the total economy <strong>in</strong> therecession and fell more sharply <strong>in</strong> the recovery, andwere higher than the total throughout virtually all ofthis time period. However, it is important to note thatafter the recent recession, manufactur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>solvenciesclosed the gap with the total economy becauseof the sector’s outperformance.0.20.02003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Total Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g ServicesSource: <strong>Euler</strong> <strong>Hermes</strong>The services sector is less sensitive to the bus<strong>in</strong>esscycle, as demonstrated by how much less <strong>in</strong>solvenciesfluctuated. S<strong>in</strong>ce it is less risky it also has an <strong>in</strong>solvencyrate lower than the total economy. ©9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!