12.07.2015 Views

report from the Juvenile Probation Commission - Texas Juvenile ...

report from the Juvenile Probation Commission - Texas Juvenile ...

report from the Juvenile Probation Commission - Texas Juvenile ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Strategy A.1.2. Progressive Sanction Levels 1-3Total Amount Appropriated for Fiscal Year 2010: $14,120,361 and Fiscal Year 2011: $14,120,361Established FY 1996Progressive Sanctions <strong>Juvenile</strong> <strong>Probation</strong> Officers (Grant F) Description and Funding MethodologyDescription. The Progressive Sanctions <strong>Juvenile</strong> <strong>Probation</strong> Officer (PSJPO) Grant provides funding to juvenileprobation departments for <strong>the</strong> salaries of officers whose primary responsibility is to provide supervision to juvenileson Levels 1, 2, or 3 of <strong>the</strong> Progressive Sanctions Model. The Legislature appropriated funds for 409 juvenile probationofficers beginning in fiscal year 1996 and an additional 184 officers were funded beginning in fiscal year 1998. Theobjective of <strong>the</strong> Progressive Sanctions JPO grant is to decrease juvenile probation officer caseloads by increasing <strong>the</strong>number of juvenile probation officers.In previous fiscal years, $5,100,000 was appropriated under this strategy to provide funds for juvenile probationservices and/or juvenile justice programs for juvenile assigned to <strong>the</strong> Progressive Sanctions Model Levels 1, 2, or 3.These funds are now included in Strategy A.1.1. Basic <strong>Probation</strong> Services based on changes made to <strong>the</strong> TJPC budgetduring <strong>the</strong> 81 st <strong>Texas</strong> Legislative session.Funding Allocation Methodology. The allocation formula for <strong>the</strong> Progressive Sanctions JPO (PSJPO) Grant is based on<strong>the</strong> same weighted population formula used to determine basic state aid funding. The PSJPO grant is used for <strong>the</strong>purpose of salary and associated benefits for only those juvenile probation officers whose primary responsibility is <strong>the</strong>supervision of juveniles on Levels 1, 2, or 3 of <strong>the</strong> Progressive Sanctions Model. The salary amount for a PSJPOallocated in <strong>the</strong> 1996-1997 biennium is $22,179 annually. The salary amount for a PSJPO allocated in <strong>the</strong> 1998-1999biennium is $27,567 annually.GOAL B: COMMUNITY CORRECTIONSStrategy B.1.1.Community Corrections ServicesTotal Amount Appropriated for Fiscal Year 2010: $93,587.112 and Fiscal Year 2011: $90,587,112Established FY 1994Community Corrections Grant (Grant Y) Description and Funding MethodologyDescription. The Community Corrections Grant provides funding to local juvenile boards for <strong>the</strong> purpose ofdeveloping community-based probation programs and services for juveniles at-risk of commitment to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Texas</strong> Youth<strong>Commission</strong> (TYC).Funding Allocation Methodology. Community Corrections funding is allocated using a three-tiered formula based onjuvenile-age population and felony referrals. Seventy-five percent of community corrections funding is allocatedbased on <strong>the</strong> juvenile-age population (Tiers One and Two) while 25% of funding is allocated based on felony referrals(Tier Three). An additional “tier” was added in fiscal year 2008 when additional funding was appropriated for <strong>the</strong>Community Corrections Grant. This new “tier” distributes <strong>the</strong> additional funding based on <strong>the</strong> county’s tax base as<strong>report</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Texas</strong> Comptroller of Public Accounts.68 TEXAS JUVENILE PROBATION COMMISSION, DECEMBER 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!