12.07.2015 Views

Course Notes - Department of Mathematics and Statistics

Course Notes - Department of Mathematics and Statistics

Course Notes - Department of Mathematics and Statistics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ln(OR) ± 1.96 × s.e.(ln(OR))−0.654 ± 1.96 × 0.1449−0.654 ± 0.284-0.938 < ln(OR) < -0.370• This is the confidence interval for ln(OR) though, we need tobacktransform to get back to the original scale.• Use the e x button on your calculator0.39 < OR < 0.69• Since 1 (the multiplicative identity) is excluded in the intervalthere is evidence to suggest we can reject the null hypothesis, <strong>and</strong>accept the alternative that using a cellphone reduces the odds <strong>of</strong>Brain Tumours.Interpreting confidence intervals for the odds ratio• The following confidence intervals are from a study into the erosion<strong>of</strong> tooth enamel as a result <strong>of</strong> exposure to chlorinated water.• They are the ratio <strong>of</strong> odds for those exposed (swim ≥ 6 hours perweek) to those not exposed (< 6 hours per week). Suppose anodds ratio greater than 1.5 is considered clinically important.OR = 1.90 with CI (1.23,2.92)• p < 0.05 <strong>and</strong> conclusive• 1 is not contained in the CI, so there is evidence <strong>of</strong> association.• the CI is above 1 indicating harm• cannot rule out a non-clinically important association.OR = 1.69 with CI (0.83,3.45)• p > 0.05 <strong>and</strong> inconclusive• point estimate indicates possible clinically important associationbut “protection” <strong>of</strong> tooth enamel can’t be ruled out.151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!