Some consumer climate change initiatives aim at just one of these levers of change,others take a combined approach. To date, the strongest emphasis has been on the ‘doyour bit’ and the ‘changes that add up’ strategies. These strategies have been targeted bymass communication campaigns, pledge schemes, guidebooks and carbonfootprint calculators.However, just as these approaches are gaining mainstream backing in the media andcommercial space, some advocates of consumer environmental awareness are beginningto question their effectiveness. They fear that the increasingly widespread uptake of amarket mediated ‘do your bit’ approach distracts from the need for more signifi cantchanges and gives consumers false reassurance that simple actions are enough.WWF UK’s recent report “Weathercocks and Signposts” analyses the growing concernabout whether small, easy changes really do add up. The report warns that unlesspeople are strongly motivated and informed, energy savings in the home may simplymean that money saved is spent on another equally energy-hungry activity. They fear thatcurrent emphasis on ‘simple and painless steps’ may be a distraction from the deeperapproaches that are needed to create more systemic change.Bright and breezy guides to saving the planet one small step at a time are widespread.But John Javna, the author of 50 Simple Things You Can Do to Save the Earth, one of theoriginal best sellers in this genre, now believes that the approach is fatally fl awed;“It is not solving problems, and in some ways it’s even creating problems because peoplethink that they’re addressing an issue in a deep way when they’re just skimming thesurface”. This year he has rewritten his book, throwing out the focus on small changesand highlighting big changes, both practical and political, that he believes will enableindividuals to make a signifi cant difference.“The economy of the future will be low-carbon. While there are still gains to be made fromThat is clear. But it is not clear what will energy effi ciency in existing products andhappen between now and that future”. processes, innovative businesses are already—Björn Stigson, World Business Council thinking beyond incremental changes tofor Sustainable Developmentdeveloping fundamental new ways to deliverproducts and services in a low-carboneconomy. However, since few of these products and services are mainstream marketready, communicating to consumers about them risks charges of ‘greenwash’. So thepredominant messages that consumers receive about climate change action continue tofocus on small-scale incremental changes that fi t within current lifestyle models.The danger is that the disjunction between the scale and gravity of the problem and thesmall steps advocated to consumers leaves consumers feeling disempowered.“I think our sense of urgency as a whole has diminished somewhat, in so much as five yearsago there was a bit of a debate about whether global warming was in fact a reality, but nowwe’ve come to the conclusion that it is, people are saying “well, it’s nothing to panic about.”We’re becoming comfortable with the idea that this is how it is. This is running counter tobeing proactive about combating it.”“You would think that companies would have more sense and be putting more R&D into makingsomething that could make more money in the future. But I think they’re too busy now to thinkabout what might make money in the future. They have short term attitudes. But I think thatwe all, as government, companies and individuals, think like that. Global warming requireslong term thinking and I don’t think any society’s been particularly good at doing that.”What Assures Consumers on Climate Change – Australian Update 13
Consumer mobilisation towards a global deal?The same range of strategies for change employed in consumer campaigns, can be seenin the development of international responses to the climate challenge, as countries andbusiness sectors consider their strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats,and the contributions they might make, as producers and consumers of energy, to theglobal solution.Just like individual consumers, nations come from starting points of very different levelsof current impacts, acceptance or responsibility and capacity for adaptation. As withconsumers, most countries recognise the seriousness of the problem, but concernsabout equity and incentives for free-riding work against collaborative outcomes.The Bali Roadmap adopted in 2007“Each country benefits from a national point of viewby the conference of the partiesif it does less of the mitigation itself, and othersto the UN’s Climate Secretariatdo more. If all countries act on this basis, without(UNFCCC) charts the course for aforethought and w, there will be no resolution of thenegotiating process to be completeddilemma.” —Ross Garnaut, 2008 Climate Changein Copenhagen in 2009. This processReviewseeks to reconcile the individualactions and concerns of over 180 countries into a viable and accountable globalmovement for change. The majority of countries are still taking the ‘do your bit’ route,showing willing by talking about or actually embracing easy changes, but standing backfrom making greater strategic commitments. Some are compiling more detailed nationalemissions inventories and carbon accounts, the national version of personal carboncalculators, to identify the most important areas where they can cut emissions.A limited number of countries are actively seeking competitive advantage in specifi careas, like Brazil’s desire to lead the market in bio-fuels, or Japan and Denmark’s effortsin renewable energy. Only a handful of smaller nations like New Zealand, Norway, Costa-Rica and Iceland have pledged to become carbon neutral across their whole economy.Many climate advocates now believe that the most important role that individualscan play, is not simply in directly reducing consumer environmental impacts, but inbuilding a groundswell of pressure on governments and business to support ambitiousgreenhouse gas emission reduction goals and radical public policy innovations. Al Goresees consumer action as a way to prevent people making the leap from disbelief tounderstanding and then straight to despair. “Optimism will not be created by belief alone,we need to change behaviours as well… I’m a big advocate of changing light bulbs,buying hybrids, installing solar panels. But it’s more important to become involved ascitizens. In order to solve the climate crisis, we need to solve the democracy crisis.”14 What Assures Consumers on Climate Change – Australian Update