Acting in the public interest â a framework for analysis - ICAEW

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The answers to these questions will all inform the decision on the relative degrees withwhich persuasion is balanced with outright requirements. Reaction needs to be anticipated inassessing the various combinations of ‘carrot, stick or sermon’ that may be needed.1.5 FeedbackThis report is issued as much to stimulate debate to evolve the framework further as topropose solutions: ICAEW welcomes comments on the analysis in this report and the proposedframework. In particular, readers are invited to give their opinions on the set of assertionssummarised at the end of the report. Comments will be taken into account in deciding onICAEW’s future work in this area.08 Summary: a public interest framework
2. INTRODUCTIONPeople use the phrase ‘in the public interest’ to justify a wide rangeof policy proposals and actions. However, it is often unclear what theymean by this and what others are supposed to make of the claim.What issues are involved in using and applying the concept of thepublic interest?How has the concept evolved?How is the concept relevant to professions?Credentials forinvoking thepublic interestImplementationApplicability ofthe publicinterestAggregation anddecisionActing inthe publicinterestThe relevantpublicConstraints towantsThe relevantpublic’s wantsPage footer09
Page 1 and 2: ACTING IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST:A FRA
Page 3: ACTING IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST:A FRA
Page 9: Our framework is based around the k
Page 14 and 15: 2. INTRODUCTION2.1 Concepts of the
Page 16 and 17: Accordingly, this report addresses
Page 18 and 19: Panel 2.4: ICAEW and its public int
Page 20 and 21: The Mediterranean republics needed
Page 22 and 23: We set out a framework for discussi
Page 24 and 25: 3. CREDENTIALS FOR INVOKINGTHE PUBL
Page 26 and 27: By and large producers operate in s
Page 29 and 30: the UK government set up a ‘Commi
Page 31 and 32: 4. APPLICABILITY OF THE PUBLIC INTE
Page 33 and 34: to be a public interest matter: fir
Page 35: This highlights that there may be p
Page 38 and 39: 5. THE RELEVANT PUBLIC5.1 ScopeIn o
Page 40 and 41: 5.3 Geographical exclusionsGeograph
Page 42 and 43: 6. THE RELEVANT PUBLIC’S WANTS6.1
Page 44 and 45: • work, that is having some, havi
Page 46 and 47: Panel 6.3: Weisbrod’s public inte
Page 48 and 49: Having sought out representative op
Page 50 and 51: 7. CONSTRAINTS TO WANTS7.1 Self-int
Page 52 and 53: In terms of whether the relevant pu
Page 54 and 55: Panel 7.5: Management of national d
Page 56 and 57: Panel 7.6: ICAEW and clarity of val
Page 58 and 59: 8. AGGREGATION AND DECISION8.1 Base
Page 60 and 61: Other ethical decision-making model
Page 62 and 63:
In this instance, while national se
Page 65 and 66:
9. IMPLEMENTATIONA proposed action
Page 67 and 68:
• giving up where targets seem un
Page 69 and 70:
9.2.1 Government authorityAt the st
Page 71 and 72:
9.3 Infrastructure and support tool
Page 73 and 74:
12. The framework proposes a signif
Page 75 and 76:
ibliographyAdler, Jonathan H, Perve
Page 77 and 78:
Goldstein, Eric A, ‘Defining the
Page 79 and 80:
Persky, Joseph, ‘Retrospectives:
Page 81:
The ICAEW is a founder member of th
show all

Acting in the public interest â a framework for analysis - ICAEW

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?

Acting in the public interest â a framework for analysis - ICAEW