Acting in the public interest â a framework for analysis - ICAEW

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSICAEW is grateful to the following commentators for sharing their knowledge and experienceof the topics with us, providing helpful reactions in a personal capacity to the developmentof the ideas in this report or commenting on drafts of it, or participating in ICAEW organiseddiscussion panels on the public interest at the American Accounting Association EthicsSymposiums in 2010 and 2012.Kenneth ChatelainJim GaaJay HansonJeff HoopsMartyn JonesLisa LindsleyGareth MorganPaul PalmerManuel RamirezStavros ThomadakisJohn ThorntonGraham WardRoss WattsNone of the commentators should be assumed to agree with the views expressed in this report,and they are not responsible for any errors or omissions.The report’s principal authors are Tony Bromell and Robert Hodgkinson.70 Acknowledgements
ibliographyAdler, Jonathan H, Perverse Incentives and the Endangered Species Act, Resources for theFuture, Weekly policy commentary 4/8/2008.Alderfer, Clayton P, ‘An Empirical Test of a New Theory of Human Needs’, OrganisationalBehaviour and Human Performance, vol 4, 1969.American Bar Association Constitution 2011, Article 1.2.Anscombe, G. E M., ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, Philosophy, 33, No 124, January 1958.Askary, Saeed and Olynyk, Mark, ‘Public Interest, Ethics, and the Balanced Scorecard:Implications for the Accounting Profession, Articles of Merit’, Australian Accounting Review,Vol 16, Issue 38, March 2006.Aslan, Reza, No God but God, London: Random House, 2006.Auditing Practices Board, ISA (UK and Ireland) 250, Section A – Consideration of laws andregulations in an audit of financial statements, The Auditing Practices Board, 2009.Barnes, Jonathan, The Complete Works of Aristotle, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,1983.Baumeister, Roy F, Campbell, Jennifer D, Krueger, Joachim I, and Vohs, Kathleen D,‘Does High Self-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, orHealthier Lifestyles?’ Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol 4, May 2003.Bazerman, Max, Loewenstein, George, and Moore, Don A, ‘Why Good AccountantsDo Bad Audits’, Harvard Business Review, November 2002.BBC News, Hormones May Fuel Market Crises, 14 April 2008.Beattie, Alan, False Economy, London: Penguin, 2010.Benditt, Theodore M, ‘The Public Interest’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol 2, Spring 1973.Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, 1781, Mineola,NY: Dover Publications, 2009.Besley, Timothy, Welfare Economics and Public Choice, London School of Economics andPolitical Science, April 2002.Boden, Leslie I, ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis: “Caveat Emptor”’, American Journal of Public Health,vol 69, No 12, 1979.Brandenburger, Adam M, and Nalebuff, Barry J, ‘The Right Game: Use Game Theory toShape Strategy’, Harvard Business Review, July-August 1995.Brooks, Clem and Manza, Jeff, Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion inDemocracies (Studies in Communication, Media, and the Public Opinion), Chicago IL: Universityof Chicago Press, 2007.Buchanan, James M, ‘Public Choice: Politics Without Romance’, Policy magazine, vol 19, 2003.Burke, Edmund, ‘Speech to the Electors of Bristol 1774’, in The Works of the Right HonourableEdmund Burke, Henry G Bohn, 1854-56.Business Day, ‘Hope Rerun “Not in Public Interest”, says JSC’, 12 May 2010.Calvert-Henderson, ‘Quality of Life Indicators’, www.calvert-henderson.com (collected12/11/2009).Capra, Fritjof and Henderson, Hazel, Qualitative Growth, London: ICAEW and Tomorrow’sCompany, 2009.Carter, Jenny, ‘For the Public Good’, Accountancy magazine, Nov 2005.Bibliography71
Page 1 and 2:
ACTING IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST:A FRA
Page 3:
ACTING IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST:A FRA
Page 9:
Our framework is based around the k
Page 12 and 13:
The answers to these questions will
Page 14 and 15:
2. INTRODUCTION2.1 Concepts of the
Page 16 and 17:
Accordingly, this report addresses
Page 18 and 19:
Panel 2.4: ICAEW and its public int
Page 20 and 21:
The Mediterranean republics needed
Page 22 and 23:
We set out a framework for discussi
Page 24 and 25: 3. CREDENTIALS FOR INVOKINGTHE PUBL
Page 26 and 27: By and large producers operate in s
Page 29 and 30: the UK government set up a ‘Commi
Page 31 and 32: 4. APPLICABILITY OF THE PUBLIC INTE
Page 33 and 34: to be a public interest matter: fir
Page 35: This highlights that there may be p
Page 38 and 39: 5. THE RELEVANT PUBLIC5.1 ScopeIn o
Page 40 and 41: 5.3 Geographical exclusionsGeograph
Page 42 and 43: 6. THE RELEVANT PUBLIC’S WANTS6.1
Page 44 and 45: • work, that is having some, havi
Page 46 and 47: Panel 6.3: Weisbrod’s public inte
Page 48 and 49: Having sought out representative op
Page 50 and 51: 7. CONSTRAINTS TO WANTS7.1 Self-int
Page 52 and 53: In terms of whether the relevant pu
Page 54 and 55: Panel 7.5: Management of national d
Page 56 and 57: Panel 7.6: ICAEW and clarity of val
Page 58 and 59: 8. AGGREGATION AND DECISION8.1 Base
Page 60 and 61: Other ethical decision-making model
Page 62 and 63: In this instance, while national se
Page 65 and 66: 9. IMPLEMENTATIONA proposed action
Page 67 and 68: • giving up where targets seem un
Page 69 and 70: 9.2.1 Government authorityAt the st
Page 71 and 72: 9.3 Infrastructure and support tool
Page 73: 12. The framework proposes a signif
Page 77 and 78: Goldstein, Eric A, ‘Defining the
Page 79 and 80: Persky, Joseph, ‘Retrospectives:
Page 81: The ICAEW is a founder member of th
show all

Acting in the public interest â a framework for analysis - ICAEW

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

Acting in the public interest â a framework for analysis - ICAEW