12.07.2015 Views

Acting in the public interest – a framework for analysis - ICAEW

Acting in the public interest – a framework for analysis - ICAEW

Acting in the public interest – a framework for analysis - ICAEW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9. IMPLEMENTATION9.1 Carrot, stick or sermon9.1.1 MotivationIf a proposed action is considered to be <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest, it follows that it is <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong>benefit that <strong>the</strong> action actually happens. Someth<strong>in</strong>g will be more likely to happen if people aremotivated to undertake or at least support it.The first need <strong>in</strong> this respect is <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed action to be understood and agreed. It willhelp to reduce <strong>the</strong> risk of error if <strong>the</strong> proposition is clear and precise, able to withstand criticalreflection, consistent, and hav<strong>in</strong>g consensus. 201The next requirement is <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>re to be a motivation to comply. Behavioural economicsrecognises that people do not necessarily behave rationally and are motivated by a variety offactors, considered below.The issue is exacerbated when <strong>the</strong> impact will be felt <strong>in</strong>ternationally: even where people aremotivated to do <strong>the</strong> ‘right’ th<strong>in</strong>g’, different cultures tend to have different perspectives on what<strong>the</strong> ‘right’ th<strong>in</strong>g to do is.9.1.2 Human natureFirst, self-<strong>in</strong>terest. Hobbes noted that, unlike ants and bees, people do not behave sociably as anatural state of affairs. 202 This has been attributed to a number of factors:• a tendency to: compete <strong>for</strong> honour and dignity; desire pre-em<strong>in</strong>ence; <strong>in</strong>terfere to re<strong>for</strong>mo<strong>the</strong>rs (but not <strong>the</strong>mselves); use words to misrepresent; and imag<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>juries when at rest. 203• re<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g this is our ‘fallible reason, re<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>ced by passions, and our diverse abilities, whichare <strong>the</strong> source of property rights and which result <strong>in</strong> conflict’. 204• motivation by selfishness and greed <strong>for</strong> esteem, by self and o<strong>the</strong>rs. 205Given that <strong>the</strong>y exist, self-<strong>in</strong>terest and ego have long been used as motivational tools to makepeople do what <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong> general (usually through government) wants <strong>the</strong>m to do. 206Whe<strong>the</strong>r people act <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of o<strong>the</strong>rs through genu<strong>in</strong>e concern or esteem could beconsidered to be irrelevant here, although from an aggregate qualitative perspective, egoism isa zero-sum game but self-respect creates humanity and virtue. 207In addition, human nature makes us prone to:• follow<strong>in</strong>g herd <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ct or ‘group th<strong>in</strong>k’; 208• a conservative tendency to stop while <strong>the</strong> go<strong>in</strong>g is good, or conversely keep plough<strong>in</strong>g onif do<strong>in</strong>g badly; 209• be<strong>in</strong>g risk averse: we are more concerned to avoid small losses than make small ga<strong>in</strong>s,accept<strong>in</strong>g a low probability of a high loss, but not vice versa. Similarly we will accept a highprobability of a low ga<strong>in</strong> but not vice versa. This can cause <strong>in</strong>surance or safety nets to result<strong>in</strong> moral hazard, as we adjust behaviour to our risk tolerance levels; 210• be<strong>in</strong>g, conversely, over confident <strong>in</strong> our own judgement; 211201Sidgwick, quoted <strong>in</strong> Schultz, ‘Henry Sidgwick’.202Quoted <strong>in</strong> Faulhaber, ‘The Rise and Fall of “Self Interest”’.203Hobbes, quoted <strong>in</strong> Faulhaber, ibid.204Madison, quoted <strong>in</strong> Faulhaber, ibid.205Mandeville referred to by Hundert, The Fable of <strong>the</strong> Bees and O<strong>the</strong>r Writ<strong>in</strong>gs.206Machiavelli, quoted <strong>in</strong> Faulhaber, ‘The Rise and Fall of ‘Self Interest’’.207Rousseau, quoted <strong>in</strong> Faulhaber, ibid.208Marnet, ‘History Repeats Itself: The Failure of Rational Choice Models <strong>in</strong> Corporate Governance’.209BBC News, ‘Hormones May Fuel Market Crises’.210Kay, The Truth About Markets.211Kay, ibid.62Implementation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!