12.07.2015 Views

Acting in the public interest – a framework for analysis - ICAEW

Acting in the public interest – a framework for analysis - ICAEW

Acting in the public interest – a framework for analysis - ICAEW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This highlights that <strong>the</strong>re may be political or o<strong>the</strong>r practical reasons why what might be <strong>the</strong>optimum <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest outcome cannot be delivered.Where such considerations do affect <strong>the</strong> outcome, long-term reputation is likely to suffer less byacknowledg<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>re are practical considerations which have changed <strong>the</strong> outcome, ra<strong>the</strong>rthan contrive an argument that <strong>the</strong> sub-optimal (from a <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest perspective) outcome isactually <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest.4.6 Use of <strong>the</strong> <strong>framework</strong> <strong>for</strong> non-<strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest mattersEven if <strong>the</strong> issue is not a <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest matter, <strong>the</strong> <strong>framework</strong> may still be useful to an advocateof an action that <strong>in</strong>volves a wider range of people than can be communicated with directly.However, <strong>the</strong> justification used should fit <strong>the</strong> purpose. O<strong>the</strong>r alternatives might <strong>in</strong>clude, <strong>for</strong>example:• acknowledgement that <strong>the</strong> matter is <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> benefit only of a few, but obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g agreementfrom those disadvantaged by <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g compensation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> arrangements; or• arrang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> matter as someth<strong>in</strong>g that people can opt <strong>in</strong> to or opt out of.4.7 Chapter summaryThe use of <strong>the</strong> concept of <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest as justification will present a challenge. Itshould be used only where it needs to be used and where it can be supported by address<strong>in</strong>gsatisfactorily <strong>the</strong> matters raised <strong>in</strong> this <strong>framework</strong>The <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest is an abstract notion; to argue and be able to hold out that an action (or<strong>in</strong>action) is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest can require consideration of a number of complex factorsand it imposes a burden of proof on <strong>the</strong> advocate of <strong>the</strong> action. Flaws <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> argument or <strong>the</strong>outcome can rebound upon <strong>the</strong> reputation of <strong>the</strong> advocate, which will harm acceptance offuture matters asserted to be <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest. Alternative means of justification may bepreferable, where much of <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong> is scoped out, or can opt out.Matters to consider when decid<strong>in</strong>g whe<strong>the</strong>r to use a <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest justification <strong>in</strong>clude:• <strong>the</strong> purpose of seek<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>voke <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest;• whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> matter is really <strong>in</strong>tended to be <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> benefit of society, as represented by <strong>the</strong>relevant <strong>public</strong> – this will <strong>in</strong>volve a wide section of <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong>, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y like it or not;• whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> locus or remit of <strong>the</strong> advocate of <strong>the</strong> action permits or requires a <strong>public</strong><strong>in</strong>terest perspective; and• whe<strong>the</strong>r political or o<strong>the</strong>r practical considerations are likely to result <strong>in</strong> a sub-optimaloutcome <strong>for</strong>m a <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest perspective.Even if <strong>the</strong> issue is not a <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest matter, <strong>the</strong> <strong>framework</strong> may still be useful to thoseadvocat<strong>in</strong>g an action that impacts upon a fairly wide group of people, but <strong>the</strong> justification usedshould fit <strong>the</strong> purpose.It is important to consider whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> likely debate would be about what is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong><strong>in</strong>terest: it may <strong>in</strong>stead be about different expectations of what is likely to happen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future.Applicability of <strong>the</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!