<strong>Private</strong> <strong>Loans</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Higher</strong> <strong>Education</strong>Summary <strong>and</strong> implicationsF<strong>in</strong>ancial aid offices are fac<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of challenges when they packagef<strong>in</strong>ancial aid for students. Although most f<strong>in</strong>ancial aid adm<strong>in</strong>istrators would like topackage aid consist<strong>in</strong>g entirely of grants <strong>and</strong> federal student loans, the reality is thatthese sources of aid are limited <strong>and</strong> cannot fully meet many students’ f<strong>in</strong>ancial need.Discuss<strong>in</strong>g the option of private loans <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong> students’ f<strong>in</strong>ancial aidpackages has become much more common <strong>in</strong> recent years. Nevertheless, some f<strong>in</strong>ancialaid offices rema<strong>in</strong> hesitant to recommend private loans because of a concernabout students’ excessive borrow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g debt levels.<strong>College</strong>s <strong>and</strong> universities’ responses to the use of private loans on their respectivecampuses have been varied; however, the decision to use a preferred lender list isbecom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly popular. Many schools cite a need for st<strong>and</strong>ardization <strong>and</strong>efficiency <strong>in</strong> order to ease the f<strong>in</strong>ancial aid process<strong>in</strong>g burden. Another reason is<strong>in</strong>stitutions’ <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g comfort with trustworthy lenders <strong>and</strong> reliable loan products.As the private loan process becomes more streaml<strong>in</strong>ed at postsecondary <strong>in</strong>stitutions,f<strong>in</strong>ancial aid adm<strong>in</strong>istrators are question<strong>in</strong>g whether or not counsel<strong>in</strong>g, much like thatfor federal student loans, should be required for students obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g private loans.Although there is little consensus on what the counsel<strong>in</strong>g should <strong>in</strong>clude, most aidadm<strong>in</strong>istrators agree that the <strong>in</strong>stitutions, students, guarantors, <strong>and</strong> lenders should allbe <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the process.32
Chapter 4Who Uses <strong>Private</strong> <strong>Loans</strong>?In order to underst<strong>and</strong> the extent <strong>and</strong> growth of the private loan market, it isessential to exam<strong>in</strong>e the types of students who are obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g these loans, <strong>and</strong> thetypes of colleges <strong>and</strong> universities at which they are likely to be enrolled. In particular,policymakers often are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> whether these loans are be<strong>in</strong>g used by “traditional”students or “non-traditional” students, by undergraduates or graduate/professionalstudents. This chapter explores these issues separately for undergraduate,professional, <strong>and</strong> other graduate students. 26 For each group, the follow<strong>in</strong>g sectionsdescribe the demographic <strong>and</strong> enrollment characteristics of private loan borrowers,the sub-sets of students who are most likely to borrow private loans, <strong>and</strong> the studentswho are likely to borrow larger amounts of private loans. The analyses reflect the<strong>in</strong>dividual characteristics associated with private loan borrow<strong>in</strong>g. 27Most of the data <strong>in</strong> this chapter are drawn from the 1999-2000 NationalPostsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS), a nationally representative survey ofundergraduate, professional, <strong>and</strong> graduate students. Although the percentages <strong>and</strong>averages may have changed s<strong>in</strong>ce then, the data provide detailed <strong>in</strong>formation aboutthe students who use private loans.Overall, professional students are more likely to obta<strong>in</strong> private loans than graduate<strong>and</strong> undergraduate students. In 1999-2000, slightly less than 4 percent of undergraduatesobta<strong>in</strong>ed these loans, with an average amount of $5,100. Meanwhile, 16 percentof professional students <strong>and</strong> 3 percent of graduate students borrowed private loans,with average amounts of $10,076 <strong>and</strong> $9,140, respectively. 28 Estimates vary on the26Professional students are those pursu<strong>in</strong>g degrees <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g fields: dentistry, medic<strong>in</strong>e, optometry, osteopathic medic<strong>in</strong>e,pharmacy, podiatric medic<strong>in</strong>e, veter<strong>in</strong>ary medic<strong>in</strong>e, chiropractic, law, <strong>and</strong> theological professions. Other graduate students are thosepursu<strong>in</strong>g all other programs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g master’s degrees, doctoral degrees, post-baccalaureate certificates, <strong>and</strong> other degrees. For thesake of simplicity,“other graduate students” are referred to as “graduate students” <strong>in</strong> the report.27The analyses do not attempt to identify the causes of private loan borrow<strong>in</strong>g, but rather attempt to pa<strong>in</strong>t a picture of the types ofstudents who use private loans. This is an important dist<strong>in</strong>ction because many of the characteristics associated with private loanborrow<strong>in</strong>g are related to each other. In order to separate the various relationships, a multivariate analysis would be necessary.28Data from other sources provide similar figures. For example, accord<strong>in</strong>g to 1999-2000 SUFAPPP data (<strong>College</strong> Board <strong>and</strong> NASFAA2002), 7 percent of undergraduates received private loans dur<strong>in</strong>g the study period. Responses from the web-based survey developedfor this report put the percentage of all students (undergraduate <strong>and</strong> graduate/professional) at about 8 percent overall, with anaverage amount of private loans of $7,741 for undergraduates <strong>and</strong> $8,582 for graduate/professional students.33