Indonesian Agricultural Research Abstracts <strong>Vol</strong>. 26, <strong>No</strong>. 1, <strong>2009</strong>092 RESNAWATI, H.Response of broiler on the diet containing Lumbricus rubellus earthworms meal. Respon ayampedaging terhadap ransum yang mengandung tepung cacing tanah (Lumbricus rubellus)/ Resnawati,H. (Balai Penelitian Ternak, Bogor (Indonesia)). [Proceedings of the national seminar on animalhusbandry and veterinary technology], Bogor (Indonesia) 12-13 Sep 2005/ Mathius, I W.; Bahri, S.;Tarmudji; Prasetyo, L.H.; Triwulanningsih, E.; Tiesnamurti, B.; Sendow, I.; Suhardono (eds.) PusatPenelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan, Bogor (Indonesia). Bogor: Puslitbangnak, 2005: p. 715-720, 4tables; 22 ref. 636:338.439/SEM/pBROILER CHICKENS; FEED CONSUMPTION; OLIGOCHAETA; FLOURS; LUMBRICUSRUBELLUS; ANIMAL PERFORMANCE; WEIGHT GAIN.The experiment was carried out to evaluate the effect of earthworms meal in the diet on broilerperformance. There were 80 days old chicks of the Arbor Acre (AA) strains: allocated to 4 treatments and5 replications. The treatments were the diets with 0, 5, 10 and 15% of earthworm meal levels given tochick aged of 0-5 weeks. Body weight gain per chick per week for each treatment were 280.2; 282.5;266.0, and 280.3 g; feed consumption were 506.95 g, 512.32 g, 515.46 g and 501.67 g; feed conversionswere 2.05, 1.96, 2.02 and 2.05, respectively. Results showed that body weight gain, feed consumption,feed conversion, carcass weight, parts of carcass weight and internal organs were not significantly(P>0.05) influenced by dietary treatments. It was indicated that the diet with 5-15% earthworms mealgiven up to 5 weeks age was recommended to be an optimum broiler performance.093 RIANTO, E.Performance of young swamp buffalo bulls fed brewery byproduct as fabricated concentratesubstitution. Penampilan produksi kerbau lumpur jantan muda yang diberi pakan ampas bir sebagaipengganti konsentrat jadi/Rianto, E.; Heryanto, Y.; Arifin, M. (Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang(Indonesia). Fakultas Peternakan). [Proceedings of the national seminar on animal husbandry andveterinary technology. Book 1], Bogor (Indonesia) 12-13 Sep 2005/Mathius, I W.; Bahri, S.; Tarmudji;Prasetyo, L.H.; Triwulanningsih, E.; Tiesnamurti, B.; Sendow, I.; Suhardono (eds.) Pusat Penelitian danPengembangan Peternakan, Bogor (Indonesia). Bogor: Puslitbangnak, 2005: p. 299-305, 1 ill., 5 tables; 9ref. 636:338.439/SEM/pWATER BUFFALOES; FEEDS; BREWERY BYPRODUCTS; RICE STRAW; ANIMALPERFORMANCE; WEIGHT GAIN.An experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of concentrate substitution by brewery byproducton the performance of young swamp buffalo bulls. This experiment used 8 young buffalo bulls (aged 1.5years and weighed 160.32 ± 17.82 kg), fed rice straw as a basal diet. The buffaloes were allocated into acompletely randomized design (CRD) with 2 treatments, i.e. T0: 100% concentrate (without brewerybyproduct); and T1: 50% concentrate and 50% brewery byproduct. Data was collected in 10 weeks. Theresults showed that dry matter intake of the treatments were not significantly different (P>0.05), whilecrude protein intake of T1 was significantly (P0.05). Average daily live weight gain of T1 (0.66kg) was significantly (P
<strong>Vol</strong>. 26, <strong>No</strong>. 1, <strong>2009</strong>Indonesian Agricultural Research AbstractsMedan (Indonesia). Fakultas Pertanian). [Proceedings of the national seminar on animal husbandry andveterinary technology. Book 1], Bogor (Indonesia) 12-13 Sep 2005/Mathius, I W.; Bahri, S.; Tarmudji;Prasetyo, L.H.; Triwulanningsih, E.; Tiesnamurti, B.; Sendow, I.; Suhardono (eds.) Pusat Penelitian danPengembangan Peternakan, Bogor (Indonesia). Bogor: Puslitbangnak, 2005: p. 416-421, 2 tables; 6 ref.636:338.439/SEM/pSHEEP; RATIONS; AGRICULTURAL WASTES; SUPPLEMENTS; FEATHER MEAL; PROTEINQUALITY.The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementation of hydrolyzed poultry feather andS, Cl (as the essential macro mineral) and I, Co, Se (as essential rare mineral) in plantation byproductbased ration on utilization, biological value of protein, and efficiency of ration. The experiment wasdesigned in a randomized complete block design with 2 x 4 factorial arrangement. The first factor wassheep breed consisted of 2 levels, b1 (sumatra thin tail lamb) and b2 (Sunge Putih crossbred). The secondfactor was supplementation consisted of 4 levels, S1 = basal ration (control) containing 14% crude protein(CP) and 70% total digestible nutrient (TDN). S2 = S1 + hydrolyzed poultry feather 3%. S3 = S2 + 0.12%Cl + 0.17% S and S4 = S3 + 0.40 ppm I + 0.15 ppm Co + 0.15 ppm Se. Twenty four heads lamb, 12 headsb1 and 12 heads b2 were used in the experiment. Lambs were divided into 3 group based on the initialbody weight. Initial body weight of lamb was 23.90 ± 2.60 kg. The results showed that hydrolyzed poultryfeather and S, Cl as well as I, Co, Se supplementation did not increase the utilization and biological valueof protein, but increased ration efficiency. The value of ration efficiency at b2 was higher (P
- Page 5: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 8 and 9: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 10 and 11: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 13 and 14: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 15 and 16: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 17 and 18: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 19 and 20: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 21 and 22: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 23 and 24: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 25 and 26: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 27 and 28: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 29 and 30: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 31 and 32: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 33 and 34: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 35 and 36: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 37 and 38: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 39 and 40: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 41 and 42: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 43 and 44: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 45 and 46: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 47 and 48: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 49: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 53 and 54: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 55 and 56: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 57 and 58: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 59 and 60: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 61 and 62: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 63 and 64: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 65 and 66: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 67 and 68: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 69 and 70: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 71 and 72: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 73 and 74: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 75 and 76: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 77 and 78: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 79 and 80: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 81 and 82: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Dickinson, M.J.
- Page 83 and 84: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 85 and 86: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 87 and 88: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 89 and 90: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 91 and 92: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 93 and 94: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 95 and 96: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 97 and 98: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 99: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab