Indonesian Agricultural Research Abstracts <strong>Vol</strong>. 26, <strong>No</strong>. 1, <strong>2009</strong>Triwulanningsih, E.; Tiesnamurti, B.; Sendow, I.; Suhardono (eds.) Pusat Penelitian dan PengembanganPeternakan, Bogor (Indonesia). Bogor: Puslitbangnak, 2005: p. 505-511, 4 tables; 13 ref.636:338.439/SEM/pSHEEP; EWES; PARTURITION; BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY EQUIPMENT; ANIMALHOUSING.A study was conducted to find out lambing behavior of merino and sumatra ewes. The parametersobserved were prelambing behavior, at lambing behavior (lambing position, duration of lambing andlambing time) and after lambing behavior (success time to stand and to suckle). Data were analyzed usingt test and regression analysis was conducted between duration of lambing and ewe's body weight as wellas time to suckle and ambient temperature. The study showed that prelambing behavior of both sheepwere consisted of laying down, walking around the barn, flechmen, vocalization, urination and floorscratching. Lambing position was mostly laying down (75.56%) for the merino and standing up (50%) forthe sumatra. The average lambing duration for both sheep was not significantly different, 23.61 ± 17.95and 31.5 ± 13.34 minutes. Whereas lambing time for merino was occurred in the evening (65.84%) andfor sumatra sheep was at day time (75%). Duration to stand up for merino and sumatra lambs wassignificantly different (P
<strong>Vol</strong>. 26, <strong>No</strong>. 1, <strong>2009</strong>Indonesian Agricultural Research Abstracts32.02 and 27.64 micro g/ml before and during moulting, while in Mojosari ducks they were 32.83 and29.32 micro g/ml, respectively. Egg weight, albumin weight, yolk weight, and haugh unit of the twobreeds increased after moulting, while yolk colour decreased. The average yolk colour of Alabio ducksbefore and after moulting were 6.90 and 5.11, while in Mojosari ducks were 7.90 and 4.60, respectively.106 PURBOWATI, E.Physiological responses of male local sheep at wide range liveweight after transported from uplandto lowland area. Respon fisiologis domba lokal jantan pada rentang bobot hidup yang lebar akibatpengangkutan dari dataran tinggi ke dataran rendah/Purbowati, E.; Purnomoadi, A. (UniversitasDiponegoro, Semarang (Indonesia). Fakultas Peternakan). [Proceedings of the national seminar on animalhusbandry and veterinary technology. Book 1], Bogor (Indonesia) 12-13 Sep 2005/Mathius, I W.; Bahri,S.; Tarmudji; Prasetyo, L.H.; Triwulanningsih, E.; Tiesnamurti, B.; Sendow, I.; Suhardono (eds.) PusatPenelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan, Bogor (Indonesia). Bogor: Puslitbangnak, 2005: p. 539-544, 1ill., 2 tables; 9 ref. 636:338.439/SEM/pSHEEP; MALES; ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY; BODY WEIGHT; TRANSPORT OF ANIMALS;HIGHLANDS; LOWLAND.Eighteen male local sheep weighed at range 7.5-35.6 kg were used in this study. These sheep wereprovided based on six groups liveweight which each group containing three sheep, namely 5-10 (averaged7.7 kg), 11-15 (11.4 kg), 16-20 (16.4 kg), 21-25 (23.1 kg), 26-30 (27.1 kg), and 31-35 (34.0 kg). Beforetransportation, sheep were fasted for 12 hours. Sheep were transported from upland with ambienttemperature 24°C at 9 o'clock to lowland area with ambient temperature 35°C at 11 o'clock. Time neededfor transportation was 2 hours. Transportation can was provided shade to avoid the sheep from direct sunradiation. The results after transported were agreed with other previous reported, such as liveweight lossranged at 0.2-0.8 kg (equal with 1.5-3.2% liveweight), rectal temperature increasing ranged at 0.3-1.0°C,heart rate increasing ranged at 13.7-45 pulse/minute, respiration rate increasing ranged at 21.0-53.3breaths/minute, blood glucose increased at range of 19.2-33.9 mg/dL, but there was a different result onhematocrite which was found decreased at range of 0.3-6%, and blood urea N changed at range -3.5-15.1mg/dL. The loss of liveweight after transportation tend to be higher at bigger liveweight followed equationY = 0.02LW + 0.068 (R = 0.721). With that equation, the loss of liveweight could be calculated to be 0.27kg of each 10 kg LW during 2 hours transportation from upland (cool) to lowland (hot) area.107 SETIOKO, A.R.Identification of body size and qualitative characteristics of matured tegal, cirebon and turi ducks.Identifikasi sifat-sifat kualitatif dan ukuran tubuh pada itik tegal, itik cirebon dan itik turi/Setioko,A.R.; Sopiyana, S. (Balai Penelitian Ternak, Bogor (Indonesia)); Sunandar, T.. [Proceedings of thenational seminar on animal husbandry and veterinary technology], Bogor (Indonesia) 12-13 Sep2005/Mathius, I W.; Bahri, S.; Tarmudji; Prasetyo, L.H.; Triwulanningsih, E.; Tiesnamurti, B.; Sendow,I.; Suhardono (eds.) Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan, Bogor (Indonesia). Bogor:Puslitbangnak, 2005: p. 786-794, 7 tables; 11 ref. 636:338.439/SEM/pDUCKS; SPECIES; BODY CONDITION; FEATHERS; COLOUR; WEIGHT; DIMENSIONS;ANIMAL PERFORMANCE.Research was conducted at three different districts, Brebes of Central Java, Cirebon of West Java andBantul of Yogyakarta. The objective of this research was to look at the general view of qualitative andquantitative characteristics female matured tegal, cirebon, and turi ducks. This research was conductedthrough a survey method. Fifty ducks for each strain were measured for further characterized bothqualitatively and quantitatively. The results indicated that the majority of tegal ducks were speckled(fawn) brown with black bill and feet, although coloring might vary from light fawn, almost white throughbrown and grey to almost black. The body was small and thin with average adult body weight varied from52
- Page 5: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 8 and 9: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 10 and 11: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 13 and 14: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 15 and 16: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 17 and 18: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 19 and 20: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 21 and 22: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 23 and 24: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 25 and 26: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 27 and 28: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 29 and 30: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 31 and 32: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 33 and 34: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 35 and 36: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 37 and 38: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 39 and 40: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 41 and 42: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 43 and 44: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 45 and 46: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 47 and 48: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 49 and 50: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 51 and 52: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 53 and 54: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 55: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 59 and 60: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 61 and 62: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 63 and 64: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 65 and 66: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 67 and 68: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 69 and 70: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 71 and 72: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 73 and 74: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 75 and 76: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 77 and 78: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 79 and 80: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 81 and 82: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Dickinson, M.J.
- Page 83 and 84: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 85 and 86: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 87 and 88: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 89 and 90: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 91 and 92: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 93 and 94: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 95 and 96: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 97 and 98: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 99: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab