Indonesian Agricultural Research Abstracts <strong>Vol</strong>. 26, <strong>No</strong>. 1, <strong>2009</strong>analysis. Result of analysis indicated that 6 of 20 samples of peanut contained quite high AFB1, exceedingthe maximum limit determined by FDA which is 20 ng/g. Five of these peanut samples contained AFB1more than three times of maximum limit (>60 ng/g), 1 peanut sample contained AFB1 25.5 ng/g andanother 14 samples contained AFB1 in the range of 0.9-15.3 ng/g. Corn and feed samples contained quitelow AFB1 which the value of AFB1 below the standard determined by SNI (
<strong>Vol</strong>. 26, <strong>No</strong>. 1, <strong>2009</strong>Indonesian Agricultural Research AbstractsQ04 FOOD COMPOSITION145 ABUBAKAR.Quality of caramel milk of broken milk during storage. Mutu susu karamel asal susu pecah selamapenyimpanan/Abubakar (Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pascapanen Pertanian, Bogor(Indonesia)); Ilyas, M. [Proceedings of the national seminar on animal husbandry and veterinarytechnology. Book 1], Bogor (Indonesia) 12-13 Sep 2005/Mathius, I W.; Bahri, S.; Tarmudji; Prasetyo,L.H.; Triwulanningsih, E.; Tiesnamurti, B.; Sendow, I.; Suhardono (eds.) Pusat Penelitian danPengembangan Peternakan, Bogor (Indonesia). Bogor: Puslitbangnak, 2005: p. 350-357, 4 ill., 4 tables; 17ref. 636:338.439/SEM/pCOW MILK; CARAMEL; MILK PRODUCTS; QUALITY; STORAGE; ORGANOLEPTICANALYSIS.Broken milk has not been utilized for food, even most people just throw away. Therefore this study wasdone in attempt to find effort in utilizing broken milk. In this study milk caramel was made and thenstudied its quality during storage. This study was done based on factorial completely randomized designwith three factors and three time repetitions. The factors were: A (two milk conditions: fresh and broken),B (wrapping and no wrapping used), C (five storage times: 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks). The quality of milkcaramel was observed based on organoleptic test (color, aroma, softness and taste), nutrition content(water fat, protein and ash). The result showed that both fresh milk caramel and broken milk caramel wereacceptable organoleptically and could last for 8 weeks wrapped and unwrapped. Fresh milk caramelcontained: 9.43% water, 2.1% ash, 19.20% protein and 25.64% fat. While broken milk caramel contained:8.18% water, 2.23% ash, 19.15% protein and 25.55% fat.146 MA'MUN.Characteristics of several essential oils of Zingiberaceae family plant in trade. Karakteristik beberapaminyak atsiri famili Zingiberaceae dalam perdagangan/Ma'mun (Balai Penelitian Tanaman Obat danAromatik, Bogor (Indonesia)). Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat ISSN 0251-0824 (2006) v.17(2) p. 91-98, 3 tables; 7 ref.ZINGIBERACEAE; ELETTARIA CARDAMOMUM; ZINGIBER OFFICINALE; CURCUMAXANTHORRHIZA; ESSENTIAL OILS; CHEMICOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES; TRADE.The essential oils of Zingiberaceae such as cardamom oil, ginger oil and curcuma oil are used in medicine,perfume, food and beverage industries and aromatherapy. Cardamom oil is distilled from E. cardamomum,produced in India and Sri Langka. Ginger oil (G. officinale) comes from China and India. Curcuma oil (C.xanthorrhiza) is still used in domestic and limited scale. The identification of cardamom oil, ginger oil andcurcuma oil characteristics originated from West Java, Central Java, Lampung and some exporters wasconducted in the Postharvest Technology Laboratory, Research Institute for Spice and Medicinal Crops.The essential oils distilled by using water and steam distillation method. Oils obtained were analyzed toget the oil characteristics which described in specific gravity, refractive index, optical rotation, solubilityin ethanol, acid number and ester number. The characteristics of those essential oils were compared to theinternational standard. The result showed that the oil characteristics of A. cardamomum and E.cardamomum were highly different. But the oil characteristics of E. cardamomum from West Java andIndonesian exporter were similar to the international standard specification. But characteristics of gingeroil from Central Java, Lampung and Indonesian exporter were not equal with international standardespecially in optical rotation specification.72
- Page 5:
Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 8 and 9:
Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 10 and 11:
Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 13 and 14:
Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 15 and 16:
Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 17 and 18:
Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 19 and 20:
Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 21 and 22:
Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 23 and 24:
Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 25 and 26: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 27 and 28: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 29 and 30: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 31 and 32: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 33 and 34: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 35 and 36: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 37 and 38: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 39 and 40: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 41 and 42: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 43 and 44: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 45 and 46: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 47 and 48: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 49 and 50: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 51 and 52: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 53 and 54: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 55 and 56: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 57 and 58: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 59 and 60: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 61 and 62: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 63 and 64: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 65 and 66: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 67 and 68: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 69 and 70: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 71 and 72: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 73 and 74: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 75: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 79 and 80: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 81 and 82: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Dickinson, M.J.
- Page 83 and 84: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 85 and 86: Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009Indonesian Agri
- Page 87 and 88: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 89 and 90: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 91 and 92: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 93 and 94: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 95 and 96: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 97 and 98: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab
- Page 99: Indonesian Agricultural Research Ab