Table of Contents - SRK Consulting
Table of Contents - SRK Consulting
Table of Contents - SRK Consulting
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Remaining Natural Vegetation: Medium-Low sensitivityDisturbed Areas: Low sensitivity.All wetlands are considered to be sensitive in South Africa (National Water Act, 1998(Act 36 <strong>of</strong> 1998) particularly in arid areas such as the Limpopo Province. All wetlandsand associated plant communities discussed in this report have thus been classifiedwith having at least a High Sensitivity. This includes the 50 meter buffer associatedwith the catchment <strong>of</strong> each wetland, with the exception <strong>of</strong> National FreshwaterEcosystem Priority Areas (the 1km buffer on the edge <strong>of</strong> the riparian fringe for theLimpopo River and one <strong>of</strong> the pans on the southern boundary <strong>of</strong> the FarmGannavlakte 299 LQ).Wetlands are the most sensitive sites within the arid landscape, although a limiteddiversity <strong>of</strong> long-lived plant species within the wetlands limits their ecologicalsensitivity. Some wetlands within LWM Study area have a higher sensitivity thanothers, with the Limpopo River and associated floodplain being <strong>of</strong> particularimportance, considered to have a Very High Sensitivity.The largest aquatic ecosystem within the proposed Mine is Groenfontein Pan (6 ha),on the Farm Matopi, which is unlikely to hold water for longer than a few weeks.Aquatic biodiversity within the proposed Mine is Low. The closest significant aquaticecosystem to the proposed mine area is the Limpopo River, located 7 km north <strong>of</strong> theproposed mine lease boundary at its nearest point.Using all information provided by the biodiversity specialist team, a final Areas <strong>of</strong>Sensitivity map was compiled. The Limpopo River and its associated floodplain wasidentified as Critically Sensitive and is considered “No-Go” and worthy <strong>of</strong> protection.The impacts classified as having a VERY HIGH or HIGH significance have beensummarized below:Aspect Impact SignificancePre-MitigationRemoval <strong>of</strong> natural Loss <strong>of</strong> vegetation types with a Very Highvegetation and High sensitivitytopsoilLoss <strong>of</strong> vegetation types with a High HighsensitivityThe destruction <strong>of</strong> available natural Highhabitat for faunal species, includingfossorial species, and the resultant loss<strong>of</strong> species that will not disperseLoss or disturbance<strong>of</strong> wetland habitatCreation <strong>of</strong> artificialhabitats (e.g.pitlakes)SignificancePost-MitigationHighHighHighLoss or disturbance <strong>of</strong> an irreplaceableresourceVery High Very HighLoss or injury to fauna High Moderate-Highvi