Basic Assessment Report - SRK

Basic Assessment ReportKZN Agriculture, Environmental Affairs &Rural DevelopmentumNyango: ezoLimo ezeMvelo nokuThuthukiswakweMiphakathi yaseMakhayaISIFUNDAZWE SAKWAZULU-NATALIFile Reference Number:NEAS Reference Number:Date Received:(For official use only)DC/KZN/EIA/Basic Assessment Reportin terms of theEnvironmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010promulgated in terms of theNational Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998)Kindly note that:1. This basic assessment report meets the requirements of the EIA Regulations, 2010 and is meant tostreamline applications. This report is the format prescribed by the KZN Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs and Rural Development. Please make sure that this is the latest version.2. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is notindicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extenditself as each space is filled with text.3. Where required, place a cross in the box you select.4. An incomplete report will be returned to the applicant for revision.5. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect ofmaterial information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it will result inthe rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations.6. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted.7. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner (“EAP”).8. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by thecompetent authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained inthis report on request, during any stage of the application process.9. The KZN Department of Agriculture, Environmental Affairs and Rural Development may require that forspecified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report need to be completed.10. The EAP must submit this basic assessment report for comment to all relevant State departments thatadminister a law relating to a matter affecting the environment. This provision is in accordance with Section24 O (2) of the National Environmental Management Act 1998 (Act 107 of 1998) and such comments must besubmitted within 40 days of such a request.11. Please note that this report must be handed in or posted to the District Office of the KZN Departmentof Agriculture, Environmental Affairs and Rural Development to which the application has beenallocated (please refer to the details provided in the letter of acknowledgement for this application).Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 1 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportSECTION A: DETAILS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTPRACTITIONER AND SPECIALISTS1. NAME AND CONTACT DETAILS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER (EAP)Name and contact details of the EAP who prepared this report:Business nameof EAP:Physicaladdress:SRK Consulting (Pty) Ltd.Section A, 2 nd Floor, IBM House54 Norfolk TerraceWestville 3630Postal address: PO Box 1969WestvillePostal code: 3630 Cell: 082 461 6356Telephone: 031 279 1200 Fax: 031 279 1204E-mail:VWeyer@srk.co.za2. NAMES AND EXPERTISE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE EAPNames and details of the expertise of each representative of the EAP involved in the preparation of thisreport:Name of representativeof the EAPMr. V.S. Reddy(Partner, strategic andtechnical guidance andreview)Ms. K. King (Review)Mrs. V. Weyer(Project co-ordinator,specialist and teammanagement, reportwriting)EducationqualificationsM.Sc. (EnvironmentalGeochemistry)B.Soc. Sci. Hons.(Geography and Env.Management)IAIAsaM.Sc. (Environmentand Development)ProfessionalaffiliationsCertified as aProfessional NaturalScientist with theSouth African Councilof Natural ScientificProfessions(SACNASP) - Pr. Sci.Nat. (South Africa)400091/03Certified as aProfessional Memberof the GrasslandSociety of SouthernAfrica.Experience atenvironmentalassessments (yrs)20 years15 years18 yearsCertified as aProfessional NaturalScientist withSACNASP - Pr. Sci.Nat. (South Africa)400337/11.CertifiedDepartment of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 2 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportName of representativeof the EAPMs. A. Murray-Rogers(Public participation,report writing)EducationqualificationsB.Soc.Sc. Hons.(Geography andEnvironmentalManagement)ProfessionalaffiliationsEnvironmentalAssessmentPractitioner with theEnvironmentalAssessmentPractitionersAssociation of SouthAfrica (CEAPSA).IAIAsaExperience atenvironmentalassessments (yrs)1 year3. NAMES AND EXPERTISE OF SPECIALISTSNames and details of the expertise of each specialist that has contributed to this report:Name ofspecialistMr. B. LynnDavies Lynn &Partners (Pty)Ltd.Mr. D. KellockAurecon SouthAfrica (Pty) Ltd.EducationqualificationsPr.Sci.Nat.M.S.A.I.E.G.M.A.E.G.Pr. Eng (ECSA)Field ofexpertiseGeohydrologyTraffic andTransportationSection/ scontributed to inthis basicassessmentreportGeotechnical andGeohydrologicalAssessmentTraffic ImpactAssessment andInvestigation intoAlternative Sitesfor a Petrol FilingStationTitle ofspecialistreport/ s asattached inAppendix DReport to SRKConsulting on aGeotechnical andGeohydrologicalAssessment of aProposed ServiceStation Site at theKing ShakaAirport, KZN.(ReferenceN7638, June2011)Traffic ImpactAssessment for aProposed PetrolFilling Station atKing ShakaInternationalAirport (ReportNo:5476/104424/KSITIA/02, July2011); andDepartment of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 3 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportName ofspecialistMr. G. MullerGraham MullerAssociates CCMr. M. SimSRK Consulting(Pty) Ltd.EducationqualificationsB.A. Hons.(Economics andMathematics).M.Sc. (Statistics).ACMA.Member ofEconomic Societyof South Africa.Member ofCharteredInstitute ofManagementAccountantsB.Tech (Civil,Water).Registered Eng.Technician (SA)(9640077)ProfessionalTechnologist (SA)(200070008)Field ofexpertiseEconomistCivil and waterengineering.Section/ scontributed to inthis basicassessmentreportEconomic ImpactAssessmentStorm WaterManagementPlanTitle ofspecialistreport/ s asattached inAppendix DInvestigation intoAlternative Sitesfor a Petrol FillingStation in theKing ShakaInternationalAirport Precinct(Report No:5513/106249/03,July 2011)Economic ImpactStudy of aProposed ServiceStation at KingShakaInternationalAirport (ReportDraft 1, August2011)Storm WaterManagementPlan for theproposed PetrolFiling Station atKing ShakaInternationalAirportNote: Specialist Declarations of Independence are attached in Appendix D.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 4 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportSECTION B: ACTIVITY INFORMATION1. PROJECT TITLEDescribe the project title as provided on the application form for environmental authorisation:Basic Environmental Assessment for a Proposed Petrol Filling Station, including Associated Facilities orInfrastructure on the Platform of King Shaka International Airport on Portion 7 of the Farm La Mercy No.15124, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal.2. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONProvide a detailed description of the project:1. Introduction and BackgroundThe Airports Company South Africa Limited (ACSA) proposes constructing a Petrol Filling Station(PFS), including associated facilities or infrastructure, on the platform of the King Shaka InternationalAirport (KSIA) at La Mercy, KwaZulu-Natal, situated on Portion 7 of the Farm La Mercy No. 15124(Figure 1 and 2).It is to be noted that ACSA is relocating the Sasol PFS from the Durban International Airport (DIA) toKSIA. As such the new PFS development is being undertaken.Design layouts indicate that four underground storage tanks (USTs), to store diesel and petrol, will beinstalled consisting of one 46 000 litre and three 23 000 litre USTs. A convenience store and fast foodoutlets are also to be included within the PFS site.The land on which the PFS is proposed is owned and occupied by ACSA, and is currently utilised as aportion of the staff asphalt parking area. Sasol will lease the site from ACSA and will be responsible forthe operation and maintenance of the PFS including USTs once installed. Sasol will be responsible forthe design and installation of the USTs and will supply fuel thereafter.The PFS is to be located on the platform of the KSIA, on the northwest corner of the existing staffasphalt parking area, which is situated in the eastern quadrant of King Shaka Drive, which is the mainaccess road to the multi-storey parking garage at the airport.2. Design PrinciplesFinal design plans for the PFS are in the course of preparation. These plans are to be submitted toACSA and the eThekwini Municipality for consideration/approval.The design principles which follow are likely the minimum standards that will be required by ACSA andthe eThekwini Municipality. It is recommended that these be used to refine the final design plans. Anydeviation/omission from these minimum standards may be permissible provided they are discussed withand approved by ACSA and the eThekwini Municipality.The proposed UST installations shall thus include the following as a minimum:Tanks, Accessories, Pipework & Installation SpecificationTanks• The installation of 3 x 23 000 litre and 1 x 46 000 litre USTs;• The proposed USTs shall consist of “Permatanks”, as supplied by Forgeweld, or an approvedequally equivalent market product replacement, that conforms to these standards.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 5 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportTanks must be double walled/”Jacketed” i.e. possessing secondary containment to preventtank content release into surrounding soil and ground water. The UST must have an interstitialleak detection monitoring system between the two walls to monitor for product leakage. ShouldSasol wish to make use of a single walled tank, the design specification must be discussedwith and approved by ACSA and the relevant approving authorities, including but not limited tothe EM and the DAEARD;• The USTs must be reliable in the event of heavy rains and flooding. UST manholes shall beimpermeable and resistant to fuel, they shall consist of a heavy duty cast iron cover, whichshall prevent damage from surface traffic; and• Construction of a reinforced concrete slab over the USTs, its thickness and strength is to bedetermined by a qualified Engineer and as approved by the eThekwini Municipality;Accessories• The filler point and tank must be fitted with overfill protection. The critical level should be suchthat a space remains in the tank to accommodate the delivery hose volume (2%). Earthing andsnap tight quick coupling is to be provided for loading of materials into tanks to minimise therisk of fires and prevent spillage and loss of materials; and• The USTs are to be fitted with a tank containment sump, fitted ontop of the tank and adispenser containment sump must be provided, fitted underneath the dispenser ascontainment. A Filler spill containment must also be provided for remote filler containmentpurposes;Pipework• Installation of associated pipe work. This shall include the installation of internationallyapproved non-corrosive pipework systems. All underground piping is to be Petrotechniks UPPExtra piping (nylon lined, 10 bar rated). Nextube Kableflex sleeving (oil industry green with asmooth internal bore) to be used as secondary containment. This is to limit the possibility ofpipe failure due to corrosion; this being the most common cause of pipe failure before thissystem was introduced to South Africa. Should Sasol wish to make use of alternative designspecifications these must be discussed with and approved by ACSA and the relevantapproving authorities, including but not limited to the EM and the DAEARD ;• All pipeline connections are to be housed within impermeable containment chambers. A leakdetector on all submersible pumps that automatically checks the integrity of the pipework onthe pressure side of the pump must be provided. Pipelines must not retain product after useand no joints are to be made underground. An emergency shut-off valve must be suppliedbetween the supply pipeline and dispenser inlet. All pipes (vent, filler and delivery) are to slopeback to the USTs so that fuel does not remain in the pipes;• Vent pipes to be fitted with “Fulcrum” vertical vent roses, or an approved equally equivalentmarket product replacement, that conforms to these standards. Confirmation of filler point andvent position to be made by an approved Engineer for safety distances required;• Vent pipes above ground are to be galvanised mild steel and are to be at least 1000mm abovethe roof height and away from any doors, windows, chimney openings and other sources ofignition; and• The tank product lines must be pressure tested prior to commissioning;Installation• The excavation must be protected against the ingress of surface run off water, and is to bekept reasonably free of sub-surface water by pumping out if necessary;• The tank farm must be lined with a HDPE liner or a suitable clay layer to prevent infiltration ofproduct to the ground water should a spill\leak occur (an impermeable liner is specificallyimportant if bedrock is encountered during excavation activities);Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 6 of 46

Basic Assessment Report• The UST is to be inspected before installation for damage, including factures or damage tocoating work. Leak and pressure tests must be conducted on tanks and pipelines to ensureintegrity prior to operation and the inspection authority must issue pressure test certificates.Any repair work required is to be conducted according to SABS 1535 (Glass-reinforcedpolyester-coated steel tanks, including jacketed tanks, for the underground storage ofhydrocarbons and oxygenated solvents and intended for burial horizontally);• The UST must be buried 750mm below finished ground level in accordance with SANS 10089-3;• Backfill to the underground structures must comprise well compacted, possibly cementstabilised, inert granular material in order to ensure that no potentially active/ expansive soilscan impact on the stability of the underground tanks or their feeder or outlet pipes, discussionsin this regard should be held with the project geohydrologist, Davies Lynn & Partners (Pty) Ltd.(DLP) (Appendix D);• The void around the UST must be back filled with a non cohesive granular material to ensurethat any product loss through the UST or ancillary pipe work will flow towards the low point;• Grit/gravel should be packed around the piezometer to prevent ingress of fines and clogging ofpiezometer slots;• The installation must comply with SANS 10 400TT (Fire Protection) 53 Sections 1-6 (Theapplication of the National Building Regulations-Installation of Liquid Fuel Dispensing Pumpsand Tanks);• The local Fire Department must be informed two (2) working days before installationcommences and to be called for inspection at the following stages:• Installation of tank on clean sand bed before backfilling;• Witness pressure test (delivery lines 1000kPa, tank 35kPa); and• Inspection of slab over tank before concreting;• The installation of tanks must comply with SANS 10131: 2004 Section 5, (the storage andhandling of liquid fuel – large consumer installations), SANS 10089 (Part I, II & III), SANS1010;• The installation must comply with local authority bylaws and all procedures and equipmentused must be in accordance with the Occupational Health & Safety Act (No. 85 of 1993) andRegulations of South Africa 3:2004, SANS 10083: 2004 and any other required SANS/ SABScodes;• The installation of tanks to comply with all other relevant National Building Regulations andStandards Act No.103 of 1977; and• Upon completion of the UST installation, an engineer is to inspect and verify that the tanks andthe associated infrastructure have been installed as per the design criteria described in thefinal BA report and to all required SABS/ SANS standards and applicable legislation. A reportthereafter, based on the engineer’s findings, it to be submitted to the various authorities;Leak detection/monitoring• USTs are to be fitted with a monitoring tube to allow for the monitoring of leaks through thetank surface;• Leak detectors are to be installed to the submersible pumps within UST manholes to ensurethat there are no line leaks;• As recommended by the Geotechnical and Geohydrological Assessment report of theproposed PFS at KSIA, as undertaken by Davies Lynn and Partners (Pty) Ltd, as contained inAppendix D of the BA report, in order to timeously identify any leakages besides the requiredindustry standard measures, a relatively inexpensive soil vapour monitoring network must beinstalled by Sasol and carried out at each corner of all the UST structures, which can bemonitored on a frequent basis (monthly intervals) using a Photo Ionisation Detector (PID) e.g.Mini RAE 2000. As confirmatory monitoring, a long term e.g. a yearly groundwater monitoringborehole should also be installed at the site of the underground storage unit/ facility.Discussions as to the location of the monitoring points/ borehole should be undertaken withACSA and Davies Lynn and Partners (Pty) Ltd.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 7 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportThe installation of Soil Vapour Sampling Points will require the placement of a permeablecoarse clean sand layer beneath the storage tanks for a vertical depth of approximately 0.5mto 1m in order to locate the vents in the 16mm diameter monitoring pipe over portion of thisdepth. If cement stabilisation is carried out within the compacted backfill beneath and aroundthe tanks the permeable coarse clean sand could be placed on and around the perimeter of thebasal concrete slab or alternatively beneath it and extending out for a metre beyond the slab;and• A ground-water monitoring plan is to be prepared by Sasol, prior to construction. The planshould include the above monitoring conditions and should provide a strategy for themanagement of any groundwater contamination detected, it should detail the frequency ofmonitoring as well as details of stock reconciliation’s;Forecourt Dispensing Area• Installation of pump islands in the forecourt area. The pumps are to be fitted with a SpillContainment Chamber;• Construction of a concrete bunded reinforced graded slab over the forecourt area, with positivefalls towards a centrally located catch-pit/sump. The slabs thickness and strength is to bedetermined by a qualified Engineer and as approved by the eThekwini Municipality;• The centrally located catch-pit/sump shall drain into a pollution containment chamber i.e. anapproved oil/water separator system. Once the wash water has passed through the system,the separated oil must be collected regularly (every three months, or as determined by ACSA)by an approved waste contractor and removed to an approved hazardous waste disposalfacility. The remaining effluent water is to discharge to the existing sewer system whichdischarges to the Southern wastewater treatment works;• Stormwater should be regularly tested before exiting the PFS and before entering the bulkstormwater lines, to ensure that the quality of stormwater out-flow from the PFS complies toGeneral Limit Values of the National Water Act (No. 36 of 1998) (NWA) as well as the SpecialLimit Values as specified in the Bulk Services Agreement. In this regard the PFS will berequired to install an approved monitoring system at an approved location, to be discussed withand approved by ACSA and the eThekwini Municipality; and• The forecourt shall be covered;Refuelling station• Filler point installation at the refuelling station;• Provision of overspill protection devices in the tank filling pipework to prevent tank overfillduring filling operations;• Construction of a concrete bunded/ dished reinforced graded slab over the filler points at therefuelling station. The slabs thickness and strength is to be determined by a qualified Engineerand as approved by the eThekwini Municipality The refuelling station will have positive fallstowards centrally located catch-pits;• These catch-pits will drain to an underground storm water pollution containment chamber. Anisolation valve will be provided downstream of this chamber. During all refueling events, theoperator is to close the isolation valve to ensure that should a major spillage occur, all fuel isthen contained within the chamber for later cleaning up operations. In all other circumstancesbesides refueling events, the isolation valve is to remain open to convey storm water (due tothe area being uncovered) to a Calcamite sand, oil and grease trap. Once the containmentchamber has been “cleaned” the valve downstream of the chamber is opened and any residualspillage on the apron or in the chamber will be piped with the runoff to the Calcamite sand, oiland grease trap located downstream of the isolation valve. The residual hydrocarbons will beseparated out from the clean water based on the principal of specific gravity in the Calcamitesand, oil, and grease trap. The outlet pipe of the trap is to connect to the nearest sewermanhole of the existing sewer system which discharges to the Southern wastewater treatmentworks. There must be regular maintenance and inspections in accordance with the OperationalEnvironmental Management Program (EMPr).Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 8 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportAll pipe-work to and from the chamber and trap is to consist of hydro-carbon resistant HPDEmaterial;• In the event of an incident all fuel will be contained within the spill containment tank for laterhazop cleaning. During normal operations the oil residue must be regularly (every threemonths, or as determined by ACSA) collected from the containment tank and the oil/wasterseparator by an approved waste contractor and removed to an approved hazardous wastedisposal facility;• Stormwater should be regularly tested before exiting the PFS and before entering the bulkstormwater lines, to ensure that the quality of stormwater out-flow from the PFS complies toGeneral Limit Values of the National Water Act (No. 36 of 1998) (NWA) as well as the SpecialLimit Values as specified in the Bulk Services Agreement. In this regard the PFS will berequired to install an approved monitoring system at an approved location, to be discussed withand approved by ACSA and the eThekwini Municipality; and• The refuelling station shall be uncovered;Vapour Recovery Systems• Stage 1 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Vapour Recovery Systems, as approved by ACSAshould be installed onto fuel dispensing nozzles at the refuelling and forecourt areas. The PFSOperator must ensure that every effort is made to limit gaseous emissions on their site and thatall equipment used is manufactured to limit VOC vapour emissions;General• The final plans must demonstrate compliance with all required SANS/ SABS codes and mustbe approved by the eThekwini Municipality;• A section drawing of the UST installation, including associated structures must be included onthe final plans submitted and must be approved by the eThekwini Municipality;• The installation must comply with the National Water Act (No. 36 of 1998);• The installation is to comply with local by-laws;• The installation is to comply with the National Building Regulations and Standards Act No. 103of 1977; and• All procedures and equipment used must be in accordance with the Occupational Health &Safety Act (No. 85 of 1993) and Regulations of South Africa.Installation and Operation of the Proposed ActivityThe overall legal responsibility for the development remains with ACSA as the landowner and applicant.However responsibility also rests with Sasol for the design and specifications of the PFS, particularly theUnderground Storage Tanks (USTs) and associated structures and for the installation of the PFS andUSTs, and any legal latent defects and installation liabilities. Sasol are also responsible for theoperation of the site including fuel supply and delivery. The PFS Operator will be responsible for the dayto day operation of the PFS and compliance with required Environment, Health and Safety requirementsand all required legislation.Site Access and DeliveriesThe PFS site is situated to the north of the Dube Boulevard/ King Shaka Drive intersection and to theeast of Dube Boulevard. Two points of access/egress are proposed, one off Dube Boulevard and theother of an unnamed street (Street 1) situated adjacent to the north, which runs along an east to westaxis.As concluded via the Traffic Impact Assessment, undertaken by Aurecon (Appendix D) all access andegress via Street 1 is permissible and access will only be permitted via a left slip from King Shaka Drivesouthbound, into the PFS. No egress into King Shaka Drive will be permissible.Sasol have indicated that fuel will be attained from 15 Hokkido Street, Island View and that twodeliveries per week are estimated.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 9 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportWaste ManagementConstruction phaseSolid wasteAll construction waste shall be categorised by the construction contractor and disposed of at anappropriate municipal landfill facility.Operational phaseSolid wasteAll general waste material (e.g. non-hazardous waste) will be contained in lined general waste bins anddisposed of via the municipal waste system.Hazardous wasteHazardous waste (e.g. oil rags, oil cans, paint cans etc.) will be stored in separate lined waste bins anddisposed of at the closest designated hazardous landfill site. The hazardous waste bins will be clearlymarked as hazardous and as flammable.An accredited approved waste contractor will be appointed to collect and dispose of the hazardouswaste at a licensed hazardous waste disposal facility.Effluent wasteClean (e.g. surface runoff from the tarmac/paved areas) and dirty (e.g. contaminated water from theforecourts and filling points at the refuelling stations) water will be separated by means of a waterseparator system (as discussed in the Stormwater Management Plan – Appendix D).Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 10 of 46

Basic Assessment Report3. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTIONDescribe each listed activity in Listing Notice 1 (GNR 544, 18 June2010) or Listing Notice 3(GNR 546, 18June 2010) which is being applied for as per the project description:Government NoticeNo. GNR 54413 The construction of facilities or infrastructure for thestorage, or for the storage and handling of a dangerousgood, where such storage occurs in containers with acombined capacity of 80 but not exceeding 500 cubicmeters4. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES“alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting thegeneral purpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to—(a) the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity;(b) the type of activity to be undertaken;(c) the design or layout of the activity;(d) the technology to be used in the activity;(e) the operational aspects of the activity; and(f) the option of not implementing the activity.Describe alternatives that are considered in this report. Alternatives should include aconsideration of all possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activitycould be accomplished in the specific instance taking account of the interest of the applicant inthe activity. The no-go alternative must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as thebaseline against which the impacts of the other alternatives are assessed. The determinationof whether site or activity (including different processes etc.) or both is appropriate needs to beinformed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. After receipt of thisreport the competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternativesthat could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear thatrealistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 11 of 46

Basic Assessment Report(a)the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activityTwo sites were identified by ACSA for the construction of a PFS at the KSIA. ACSA’s preferred site (Figures 1 and 2, E1) is located on the north-eastquadrant of Dube Boulevard/King Shaka Drive/ Dube Avenue intersection, whilst ACSA’s alternative site (Figure 1 and 2, E2) is located in the north-westquadrant of Dube Boulevard/King Shaka Drive/ Dube Avenue intersection. The preferred site (E1) is considered by ACSA to be the most desirable in terms ofthe bio-physical and socio-economic constraints and opportunities of the area.Eight further alternative sites were identified by the JV Company 1 and their consultants, Virtual Buro, as appointed by Dube TradePort (DTP) on behalf of theJV Company.These JV sites together with the ACSA sites (10 sites) were investigated by Aurecon SA (Pty) Ltd. (Aurecon), on behalf of ACSA, with the purpose of theinvestigation being to consider and rank the sites according to traffic related criteria for a PFS within an airport precinct with a view to arriving at onerecommended site (Appendix D).The location of the sites considered is as follows (Figure 1 and 2):• Site A1 is situated to the north of Dube Boulevard quite close to the N2;• Site A2 is situated to the south of Dube Boulevard quite close to the N2;• Site B1 is situated to the south of Dube Boulevard roughly midway between the N2 and King Shaka Drive;• Site B2 is situated to the south of Dube Boulevard just west of site B1;• Site C1 is situated in the south-east quadrant of the Dube Boulevard/ King Shaka Drive/ Dube Avenue intersection;• Site C2 is situated in the south-west quadrant of the Dube Boulevard/ King Shaka Drive/ Dube Avenue intersection;• Site D1 is situated close to the R102, somewhat to the south of the existing intersection with Dube Boulevard;• Site D2 is situated close to the R102, immediately to the south of the existing intersection with Dube Boulevard;• Site E1 (ACSA’s preferred site) is situated in the north-east quadrant of the Dube Boulevard/ King Shaka Drive/ Dube Avenue intersection; and• Site E2 (ACSA’s alternative site) is situated in the north-west quadrant of the Dube Boulevard/ King Shaka Drive/ Dube Avenue intersection.1 The JV Company is a joint venture between ACSA and DTP.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 12 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportThe traffic related criteria used in the investigation included the following:CRITERIA1 Primarily aimed at outbound traffic but should be accessible to inbound traffic as well2 Exposed to the highest traffic volume passing by3 Good visibility from surrounding roads4 Ease of entry5 Ease of egress6 Minimum of right turns7 Accesses and egress should not be affected by external queue back-up8 Road safety9 Site topography10 Big enough for internal circulation11 Should be able to accommodate other uses (convenience shop/ fast food)12. Must be able to erect a prime sign on the site13 Convenient for car hire returns, for refueling by public (to avoid car hire refueling charge and toretain control of amount of fuel added)14 Acceptable to Traffic AuthoritiesThe sites were visited and each was assessed subjectively against the criteria listed above. A ranking of between 0 and 10 (10 being the highest score and 0 the lowest)was noted for every criterion for each site and the rankings were then summated to give a total ranking for each site. The sites were then further ranked, with 1 being bestand 10 worst. The rankings and summary were as follows:Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 13 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportRANKINGS FOR A SUCCESSFUL PETROL FILLING STATION WITHIN AN AIRPORT ENVIRONMENT (0 -10) FOR EACH CRITERIONCRITERIA A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 D1 D2 E1 E2SITE1Primarily aimed at outbound traffic but should beaccessible to inbound traffic as well 6 2 3 3 3 2 2 7 10 42 Exposed to the Highest traffic volume passing by 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 10 93 Good visibility from surrounding roads 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 64 Ease of entry 6 6 2 2 4 4 3 5 7 55 Ease of egress 6 6 3 3 5 6 3 5 7 56 Minimum of right turns 8 8 8 8 5 5 7 6 9 37Accesses and egress should not be affected byexternal queue back-up 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 6 6 88 Road safety 4 4 2 2 7 7 5 5 7 89 Site topography 3 3 3 2 8 8 5 5 8 710 Big enough for internal circulation 4 4 4 7 8 8 8 8 8 811Should be able to accommodate other uses (Quickshop) 4 4 4 5 8 8 8 8 8 812 Must be able to erect a prime sign on the site 8 8 8 0 8 8 9 9 8 813 Convenient for car hire returns by public 0 6 6 6 5 5 0 5 6 714 Acceptable to Traffic Authorities 0 0 6 6 8 8 0 2 8 8Add all ratings 66 68 66 61 85 85 65 80 109 94Placing (1 best, 10 worst) 7 6 7 10 3 3 9 5 1 2Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 14 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportFrom a traffic criteria perspective for determining the best location for a PFS in the area, the study concluded the following:• Sites E1, E2, C1, C2 and D2 appeared to be preferable to the others; and• Site E1 (ACSA’S preferred site), which is situated in the north-east quadrant of the Dube Boulevard/ King Shaka Drive/ Dube Avenue intersection, scored thehighest rating (109).As Aurecon’s investigation only included traffic related criteria for the best location for a PFS in the area, SRK have further evaluated the sites in terms ofenvironmental sensitivity (topography, hydrology and DMOSS/natural vegetation), land ownership, zoning and planning status (Figure 3). GIS databases assourced from the eThekwini Municiaplity were evaluated to determine environmental sensitivity. For continuity, a similar ranking process as used by Aureconin their assessment has been applied, i.e. ranking of 0-10 (10 being the highest score (optimal) and 0 the lowest (sub-optimal)), the summation of therankings and then the placing of the sites in their order of suitability (1 - best, 10 - worst).Environmental Ranking of SitesSitenumberDMOSS/naturalvegetationHydrologyTopographyZoningstatusPlanningstatusLandownershipTraffic relatedcriteria (Aurecon,2011b)Summationof ratingsA1 0 4 3 0 0 JV 4 11 10A2 0 4 3 0 0 JV 5 12 9B1 2 4 3 0 5 JV 4 18 7B2 3 4 2 0 5 JV 1 15 8C1 10 4 8 10 10 ACSA 8 50 3C2 9 4 8 10 10 ACSA 8 49 4D1 9 4 5 0 10 JV 2 30 6D2 9 4 5 0 10 JV 6 34 5E1 10 10 8 10 10 ACSA 10 58 1E2 9 10 7 10 10 ACSA 9 55 2Overallranking(1 best, 10worst)Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 15 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportDiscussion of rankings and findings:DMOSS/ Natural VegetationProximity to DMOSS/ natural vegetation was ranked, with sites in close proximity being given a score of 0 and sites further away being given 10. Sites A1 andA2 are located entirely within the DMOSS corridor, which runs parallel to the N2. Development within this corridor also has limitations in terms of visualsensitivity. With the South Africa National Road Agency (SANRAL) preferring to keep land directly adjacent to the N2 free from development and signage, soas to maintain the visual amenity of the National Road (N2). From discussions undertaken by Aurecon with SANRAL, they have indicated that they will notsupport development of a site in this area (Appendix D and E). Sites B1 and B2 are located partially within DMOSS, whilst the remaining sites are situatedoutside of DMOSS. Site E1 (ACSA’s preferred site) is the most disturbed of all the sites with an asphalt surface. Site C1 is also highly disturbed in its centralarea, with a limited undisturbed area on its periphery. Site E2 (ACSA’s alternative site) contains exotic grass and is landscaped, whilst the remaining sitescontain sugarcane/ abandoned sugarcane/ disturbed vegetation.HydrologyProximity to drainage lines/ streams was ranked, with sites in close proximity being given a score of 0 and sites further away being given 10. Sites E1(ACSA’s preferred site) and E2 (ACSA’s alternative site) are located on the levelled airport platform, on the outer edge of the Mdloti Catchment and furtherestfrom drainage lines/ streams that drain into the Mdloti River. The remaining sites are located further within the Mdloti Catchment and in close proximity todrainage lines/ streams. The Mdloti Catchment is considered highly sensitive as the catchment is small and the sensitive Mount Moreland Wetland is locatedwithin the catchment to the south. Sites further away from the drainage lines/ streams and on the edges of the catchment are thus considered more desirable.TopographyTopography was ranked with sites with steep topography being given a score of 0 and sites with gentle topography being given a score of 10; use was madeof a GIS database and Aurecon (2011b) rankings for site topography. ACSA’s preferred site, E1 and sites C1 and C2 were found to be the best suited as theywere found to be the most level.Zoning StatusZoning status was ranked, with sites having a suitable zoning status already in place and the site not requiring any rezoning work being ranked as 10, whilstsites that require rezoning being given a score of 0. Sites E1, E2, C1 and C2 are zoned, ‘Special Zone 10 (Airport)’, and the construction of a Petrol FillingStation (PFS) within this zoning is permissible. The remaining sites are zoned, ‘Undertermined’, therefore a zoning process would be required, which couldresult in lengthy delays for development of a PFS in the airport precinct.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 16 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportPlanning StatusPlanning status was ranked according to conformance with planning requirements for the area (Dube TradePort Development Framework Plan (DTPDFP),Extract from the Umhlanga Town Planning Scheme No. 1: Table D, Special Zone 10 (airport) and Undetermined and the Dube TradePort Airport Precinct 1(South Eastern Sub-precinct) Development Manual), with sites with greatest conformity being given a ranking of 10 and sites with limited conformity beinggiven a ranking of 0. The site planning informants contained in the DTPDFP were examined. The sites least affected by these constraints include: E1, E2, C1,C2, D1 and D2. The sites most affected include A1 and A2; these sites also fall within an area designated for rehabilitation in the Environmental ServicesFramework. Sites B1 and B2 fall on the edge of this area within a small pocket area in a support zone. However due to the proximity of these sites to therehabilitation area and close proximity to drainage lines/ streams they have scored a slightly lower ranking status.Land OwnershipThe land ownership of sites has been provided for information purposes.Traffic Related CriteriaThe ranking for this section was taken from Aurecon’s placing of the sites from best to worst, with best being given a ranking of 10 and worst a ranking of 0.Site E1 (ACSA’s preferred site) was found to be the best site for a PFS, followed by E2 (ACSA’s alternative site), then C1 and then C2. It shouldhowever be noted that sites C1 and C2 are very close in proximity to the Dube Boulevard / King Shaka Avenue interchange , at which major futuretraffic development changes are planned. Sites A1 and A2 were rated as the worst sites for a PFS.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 17 of 46

Basic Assessment Report(b)the type of activity to be undertaken;The ACSA preferred site is currently used as an ACSA staff car parking area, whilst the ACSAalternative site is used as a coach staging area and is landscaped. At present no alternativeactivities/ land use for the sites are proposed other than their current use and proposed PFSuse. To accommodate the existing site uses should these be replaced with the proposed PFSuse, ACSA is able to provide sufficient alternative staff parking (preferred site) and only aportion of the coach staging area will be used, should development of the alternative site occur.(c)the design or layout of the activity;Three layout options (A, B and C) have been proposed by Sasol (Appendix A). The entranceand exit positions and locations of the USTs are identical in each layout option. The layoutoptions vary only in the positioning of the forecourt, convenience shop and fast food outlets.Sasol have indicated in terms of ease of development of the site and economic feasibility, thatlayout Option A is the preferred option.(d)the technology to be used in the activity;Apart from the standard PFS technology proposed, given the sensitivities of the adjacent Mdloticatchment, a double walled “Permatank” and additional monitoring has been recommended. Inaddition Stage 1 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Vapour Recovery Systems, as approved by ACSAshould be installed onto fuel dispensing nozzles at the refuelling and forecourt areas.(e)the operational aspects of the activity; andNo alternative operational aspects of the activity are proposed, again standard industry PFSoperational procedures will be applied(f)the option of not implementing the activityShould ACSA not undertake the construction of the PFS, the sites will remain as is and willcontinue to be used as the ACSA staff car parking (preferred site) and as the coach stagingarea (alternative site). The KSIA will however remain without an operational PFS and airportusers will continue to experience inconvenience in not being able to attain fuel for their vehiclesat a close and convenient location. The nearest PFS is located 6km away, outside of the airporttraffic flow routes. The other JV sites proposed will have development delays due to re-zoningapplications being required (refer to discussion in Section 4 (a) above).Sections B 5 – 15 below should be completed for each alternative.Note: This has been undertaken for only the two ACSA site alternatives (preferred andalternative site) and not the proposed JV Sites.5. ACTIVITY POSITIONIndicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the sitefor each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees, minutes and seconds. Listalternative sites were applicable.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 18 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportLatitude (S):Longitude (E):Alternative:Alternative S1 2 (preferred or only 29° 37‘ 17.77“ 31° 06‘ 1.90“site alternative) E1 - ACSA SiteAlternative S2 (if any) E2 - ACSA 29° 37‘ 15.66“ 31° 05‘ 58.25“SiteAlternative S3 (if any) A1 - JV 29 o 37‘ 39.00 “ 31 o 7‘ 18.09 “SiteA2 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 42.16 “ 31 o 7‘ 7.38 “B1 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 41.63 “ 31 o 6‘ 39.44 “B2 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 43.82 “ 31 o 6‘ 30.41 “C1 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 24.80 “ 31 o 5‘ 57.31 “C2 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 20.15 “ 31 o 5‘ 51.92 “D1 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 6.98 “ 31 o 5‘ 0.64 “D2 - JV Site 29 o 36‘ 59.12 “ 31 o 5‘ 9.26 “In the case of linear activities:Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E):Alternative S1 (preferred or onlyroute alternative)• Starting point of the activity• Middle point of the activity• End point of the activityAlternative S2 (if any)• Starting point of the activity• Middle point of the activity• End point of the activityAlternative S3 (if any)• Starting point of the activity• Middle point of the activity• End point of the activityFor route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with coordinatestaken every 500m along the route for each alternative alignment.6. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITYIndicate the physical size of the preferred activity/technology as well as alternativeactivities/technologies (footprints):Alternative:Size of the activity:Alternative A1 3 (preferred activity alternative) Approx. 5000 m 2Alternative A2 (if any)N/AAlternative A3 (if any)N/Aor, for linear activities:2 “Alternative S..” refer to site alternatives.3 “Alternative A..” refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 19 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportAlternative:Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative)Alternative A2 (if any)Alternative A3 (if any)Length of theactivity:Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints willoccur):Alternative:Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative)Alternative A2 (if any)Alternative A3 (if any)7. SITE ACCESSSize of thesite/servitude:Does ready access to the site exist?If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be builtDescribe the type of access road planned:YESN/AInclude the position of the access road on the site plan and required map, as well as anindication of the road in relation to the site.8. SITE OR ROUTE PLANA detailed site or route plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity.It must be attached as Appendix A to this report.The site or route plans must indicate the following:a. the scale of the plan which must be at least a scale of 1:500;b. the property boundaries and numbers/ erf/ farm numbers of all adjoiningproperties of the site;c. the current land use as well as the land use zoning of each of the propertiesadjoining the site or sites;d. the exact position of each element of the application as well as any otherstructures on the site;e. the position of services, including electricity supply cables (indicate above orunderground), water supply pipelines, boreholes, street lights, sewagepipelines, storm water infrastructure and telecommunication infrastructure;f. walls and fencing including details of the height and construction material;g. servitudes indicating the purpose of the servitude;h. sensitive environmental elements within 100 metres of the site or sitesincluding (but not limited thereto): rivers, streams, drainage lines or wetlands; the 1:100 year flood line (where available or where it is required by DWA); ridges; cultural and historical features;Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 20 of 46

Basic Assessment Report areas with indigenous vegetation including protected plant species (even if it isdegraded or infested with alien species);i. for gentle slopes the 1 metre contour intervals must be indicated on the planand whenever the slope of the site exceeds 1:10, the 500mm contours mustbe indicated on the plan; andj. the positions from where photographs of the site were taken.(Refer to Appendix A and Figures 1, 2 and 3)9. SITE PHOTOGRAPHSColour photographs from the centre of the site must be taken in at least the eight majorcompass directions with a description of each photograph. Photographs must be attachedunder Appendix B to this report. It must be supplemented with additional photographs ofrelevant features on the site, if applicable.(Refer to Appendix B)10. FACILITY ILLUSTRATIONA detailed illustration of the facility must be provided at a scale of 1:200 and attached to thisreport as Appendix C. The illustrations must be to scale and must represent a realistic imageof the planned activity/ies. (Refer to Appendix C)11. ACTIVITY MOTIVATIONa. Socio-economic value of the activityWhat is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? R 12 000 000What is the expected yearly income that will be generated by or as a result ofthe activity?Not availableWill the activity contribute to service infrastructure?YESIs the activity a public amenity?YESHow many new employment opportunities will be created in the development 50phase of the activity?What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during thedevelopment phase?Not availableWhat percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? Not availableHow many permanent new employment opportunities will be created duringthe operational phase of the activity?Not availableWhat is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during thefirst 10 years?Not availableWhat percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? Not availableb. Need and desirability of the activityMotivate and explain the need and desirability of the activity (including demand for the activity):There is currently no Petrol Filling Station (PFS) at the King Shaka International airport (KSIA) with thenearest petrol filling station located approximately 6km away from the airport (Buffelsdraai BP, DahliaDrive). In total there are three PFS in the area, located along the R102, in Umdloti and in Verulum, butnone in close proximity to the airport. Airport users are thus currently inconvenienced, with no easilyaccessible PFS being available at the airport for the refuelling of vehicles.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 21 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportThe PFS development at the KSIA is also being undertaken in response to the relocation of the SasolPFS, which was located at the Durban International Airport (DIA), and which had to close with theclosure of the DIA.Of the ten sites proposed by ACSA (ACSA’s preferred (E1) and alternative site (E2)) and the JVcompany (A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2, D1 and D2), only four of these are zoned “Special Zone 10”, whichpermits a PFS use. These include sites E1, E2 and C1 and C2. All remaining sites require rezoning,which could result in a lengthy delay of the provision of a much needed essential airport service. SitesC1 and C2 are also less desirable than E1 and E2 as they are located closer to the future majorinterchange, which is planned at the intersection of Dube Boulevard and King Shaka Avenue (Section4 (a)).The PFS is an essential component of airport services and its presence is required as matter ofurgency for the optimal servicing of the airport, for airport user convenience.Indicate any benefits that the activity will have for society in general:Benefits will be accrued to airport users as a close, convenient supply of fuel and other PFSconvenience facilities will be provided.Jobs that were lost due to the closure of the Sasol PFS at the DIA will be re-created.Jobs will be created during the construction phase of the PFS and the local economy will benefit interms of supply of building materials and services.Indicate any benefits that the activity will have for the local communities where the activity willbe located:Wherever possible labour, materials and services will be sourced locally.12. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINESList all legislation, policies and/or guidelines of any sphere of government that are relevant tothe application as contemplated in the EIA regulations, if applicable:Title of legislation, policy or guideline: Administering authority: Date:South Africa’s Constitution, 1996 (Act 108 of 1996), National Government 1996including the Bill of Rights (Chapter 2, Section 24)National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (No. 107of 1998) (NEMA), including the NEMA Amendment Act,2008 (No. 62 of 2008)National Government, andNational Department ofEnvironmental Affairs1998NEMA EIA Regulations, 2010 (Government Notice Nos.543, 544, 545 and 546)National Environment Management: Air Quality Act,2004 (Act No. 39 of 2004) (NEM: AQA)National Department ofEnvironmental Affairs andProvincial Department ofAgriculture, EnvironmentalAffairs and RuralDevelopment.National Department ofEnvironmental Affairs andProvincial Department ofAgriculture, EnvironmentalAffairs and RuralDevelopment20102004Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 22 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportNational Ambient Air Quality Standards in Terms ofSection 9(1)(a) and (b) of the National EnvironmentalManagement: Air Quality Act, 2004 (Act No. 39 of 2004)(Government Notice No. 1210, 24 December 2009)National Environment Management: Air Quality Act,2004 (Act No. 39 of 2004), List of activities which resultin atmospheric emissions which have or may have asignificant detrimental effect on the environment,including health, social conditions, economic conditions,ecological conditions or cultural heritage (GovernmentNotice No. 248, 31 March 2010)Model Noise Regulations published under theEnvironment Conservation Act, 1989 (Act 73 of 1989)National Department ofEnvironmental Affairs andProvincial Department ofAgriculture, EnvironmentalAffairs and RuralDevelopmentNational Department ofEnvironmental Affairs andProvincial Department ofAgriculture, EnvironmentalAffairs and RuralDevelopment20092010National Government 1989Health Act, 1977 (Act 63 of 1977) National Government 1977Occupational Health & Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of1993) (OHSA) as amended in July 2001, including MajorHazard Installation Regulation, GNR 692, 30 July 2001.National Government 2001Hazardous Substances Act, 1973 (Act No. 15 of 1973) National Government 1973National Road Traffic Act, 1996 (Act No. 93 of 1996) Department of Transport 1996National Environmental Management: Waste Act, 2008(Act No. 59 of 2008) (NEM:WA)National Department ofEnvironmental Affairs andProvincial Department ofAgriculture, EnvironmentalAffairs and RuralDevelopment2008The National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act No 25 National Governmentof 1999) as amended, particularly Chapter II, Section 381999KwaZulu-Natal Heritage Act, 2008 (Act No. 4 of 2008) AMAFA 2008The National Water Act, 1998 (Act No. 36 of 1998) Department of Water Affairs 1998Water Services Act (Act No. 108 of 1997) Department of Water Affairs 1997South African Manual for Outdoor Advertising Control(SAMOAC)Standards Act (30 of 1992) National Government 1992National Building Regulations and Building Standards National GovernmentAct (No 103 of 1977)Municipal Structures Act (Act 117 of 1998) Local Municipality 1998Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of 2000) Local Municipality 2000eThekwini Municipality by-laws.eThekwini MunicipalityDepartment of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 23 of 46

Basic Assessment Report13. WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENTa. Solid waste managementWill the activity produce solid construction waste during the YESconstruction/initiation phase?If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month?3-6m³How will the construction solid waste be disposed of? (describe)General waste and hazardous waste will be collected and stored separately according to the specificrequirements of the waste type. General waste will be disposed at an approved general waste landfillsite, likely La Mercy. Hazardous waste will be collected by an approved waste disposal ServiceProvider, likely Enviroserv and will be disposed of to an approved hazardous waste disposal landfill site.Where will the construction solid waste be disposed of? (provide details oflandfill site)As aboveWill the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase?YESIf yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month?2-6m³How will the solid waste be disposed of? (provide details of landfill site)An integrated waste management approach that is based on waste minimisation will be used andshould incorporate reduction, recycling, re-use and disposal where appropriate. Any solid waste shall bedisposed of at a landfill licensed in terms of section 20 (b) of the National Management Waste Act, 2008(Act No. 59 of 2008).Hazardous substances will be disposed at an appropriate classified waste site (unless it is to berecycled by approved methods), as per the National Environmental Management Waste Act 59 of 2008.Waste from the oil interceptors must be disposed of to a suitable waste-handling contractor where SafeDisposal Certificates are to be issued.Where will the solid waste be disposed if it does not feed into a municipal waste stream(describe)?As aboveIf the solid waste (construction or operational phases) will not be disposed of in a registeredlandfill site or be taken up in a municipal waste stream, then the applicant should consult withthe competent authority to determine the further requirements of the application.Can any part of the solid waste be classified as hazardous in terms of the YESrelevant legislation?If yes, contact the KZN Department of Agriculture, Environmental Affairs and RuralDevelopment to obtain clarity regarding the process requirements for your application.Is the activity that is being applied for a solid waste handling or treatment NOfacility?If yes, contact the KZN Department of Agriculture, Environmental Affairs and RuralDevelopment to obtain clarity regarding the process requirements for your application.b. Liquid effluentWill the activity produce effluent, other than normal sewage, that will bedisposed of in a municipal sewage system?If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month?YESN/ASurface water runoff that may contain oil/ fuel will be directed into catch pits/ oilwater separators and clean water will then be directed to the KSIA sewersystem.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 24 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportWill the activity produce any effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of onsite?YESSurface water runoff that may contain oil/ fuel will be directed into catch pits/ oilwater separators and clean water will then be directed to the KSIA sewersystem.If yes, contact the KZN Department of Agriculture, Environmental Affairs and RuralDevelopment to obtain clarity regarding the process requirements for your application.Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at NOanother facility?If yes, provide the particulars of the facility:Facility name:Contactperson:Postaladdress:Postal code:Telephone:Cell:E-mail:Fax:Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of wastewater, if any:An integrated waste management approach that is based on waste minimisation will be usedand should incorporate reduction, recycling, re-use and disposal where appropriate. Any solidwaste shall be disposed of at a landfill licensed in terms of section 20 (b) of the NationalManagement Waste Act, 2008 (Act No. 59 of 2008).c. Emissions into the atmosphereWill the activity release emissions into the atmosphere?YESIf yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government?NOIf yes, contact the KZN Department of Agriculture, Environmental Affairsand Rural Development to obtain clarity regarding the processrequirements for your application.If no, describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration:Potential gas emissions may be released from the tank vents during refilling, vehicle refuelling, fuelspillage and motor vehicle exhausts. Odours may arise from the waste generated on-site if not disposedof appropraitely.d. Generation of noiseWill the activity generate noise?YESIf yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government?NOIf yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determinewhether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.If no, describe the noise in terms of type and level:Noise may be generated by vehicles entering and exiting the site, personnel and customers at the fillingstation and the associated facilities, car sound systems and hooters, and ventilation equipment.However due to the surrounding land use being the King Shaka International Airport, it is envisionedthat the noise levels will not be significant in relation to the existing activities on site.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 25 of 46

Basic Assessment Report14. WATER USEPlease indicate the source(s) of water that will be used for the activity by ticking the appropriatebox(es):MunicipalXwaterboardgroundwater river, stream,dam or lakeotherthe activity will notuse waterIf water is to be extracted from groundwater, river, stream, dam, lake or anyother natural feature, please indicate the volume that will be extracted permonth:Does the activity require a water use permit from the Department of Water NOAffairs?If YES, please submit the necessary application to the Department of Water Affairs and attachproof thereof to this report.15. ENERGY EFFICIENCYDescribe the design measures, if any, that have been taken to ensure that the activity is energyefficient:Standard PFS construction designs, including SANS/SABS specifications will apply.Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into thedesign of the activity, if any:Standard PFS construction designs will apply.SECTION C: SITE/ AREA/ PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONImportant notes:• For linear activities (pipelines, etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may benecessary to complete this section for each part of the site that has a significantly differentenvironment. In such cases please complete copies of Section C and indicate the area,which is covered by each copy No. on the Site Plan.Section C Copy No.(e.g. A):N/A• Subsections 1 - 6 below must be completed for each alternative.Note: Only ACSA’s chosen sites have been described, i.e. ACSA’s preferred site (E1/ S1)and ACSA’s Alternative site (E2/ S2).Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 26 of 46

Basic Assessment Report1. GRADIENT OF THE SITEIndicate the general gradient of the site.Alternative S1:Flat 1:50 – 1:20 – 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 –X 1:20 1:151:7,5Alternative S2 (if any):Flat 1:50 – 1:20 – 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 –X 1:20 1:151:7,5Alternative S3 (if any):Flat 1:50 – 1:20 – 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 –1:20 1:151:7,51:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than1:51:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than1:51:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than1:52. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPEIndicate the landform(s) that best describes the site (Please cross the appropriate box).Alternative S1 (preferred site):Ridgeline PlateauXSide slope ofhill/mountainClosedvalleyOpenvalleyPlain Undulatingplain/low hillsAlternative S2 (if any):Ridgeline Plateau Side slope of Closed Open Plain UndulatingX hill/mountain valley valleyplain/low hillsAlternative S3 (if any):Ridgeline Plateau Side slope of Closed Open Plain Undulatinghill/mountain valley valleyplain/low hills3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITEDuneDuneDuneSeafrontSeafrontSeafrontHas a specialist been consulted for the completion of this section?YESIf YES, please complete the following:Name of the specialist: Mr. B. Lynn (Davis Lynn & Partners (Pty) Ltd.)Qualification(s) of the specialist: Pr.Sci.Nat. M.S.A.I.E.G., M.A.E.G.Postal address:PO Box 568, KloofPostal code: 3640Telephone: 031 764 7335 Cell: 0836551194E-mail: dlpdbn@dlp.co.za Fax: 031 764 7385Are there any rare or endangered flora or fauna species (including red data species)present on any of the alternative sites?If YES, specify N/Aand explain:Are their any special or sensitive habitats or other natural features present on any of thealternative sites?If YES, specify N/Aand explain:Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist?If YES, N/Aspecify:If YES, is such a report(s) attached in Appendix D?YESNONONOSignature of specialist:Refer to attached signeddeclaration of independence,Appendix DDate:Refer to attached signed declaration ofindependence, Appendix DDepartment of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 27 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportIs the site(s) located on any of the following (cross the appropriate boxes)?Alternative S1: Alternative S2 (ifAlternative S3 (ifany):any):Shallow water table (less than 1.5mNO NO YES NOdeep)Dolomite, sinkhole or doline areas NO NO YES NOSeasonally wet soils (often close toNO NO YES NOwater bodies)Unstable rocky slopes or steepNO NO YES NOslopes with loose soilDispersive soils (soils that dissolveNO NO YES NOin water)Soils with high clay content (clayNO NO YES NOfraction more than 40%)Any other unstable soil orNO NO YES NOgeological featureAn area sensitive to erosion NO NO YES NOIf you are unsure about any of the above or if you are concerned that any of the above aspectsmay be an issue of concern in the application, an appropriate specialist should be appointed toassist in the completion of this section. (Information in respect of the above will often beavailable as part of the project information or at the planning sections of local authorities.Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scale Regional Geotechnical Maps prepared by the Council forGeo Science may also be consulted).4. GROUNDCOVERHas a specialist been consulted for the completion of this section?If YES, please complete the following:Name of the specialist:N/AQualification(s) of the specialist: N/APostal address:N/APostal code:N/ATelephone: N/A Cell: N/AE-mail: N/A Fax: N/AAre there any rare or endangered flora or fauna species (including red data species)present on any of the alternative sites?If YES, specify N/Aand explain:Are their any special or sensitive habitats or other natural features present on any of thealternative sites?If YES, specify N/Aand explain:Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist?If YES, N/Aspecify:If YES, is such a report(s) attached in Appendix D?NONONOSignature of specialist: N/A Date: N/AThe location of all identified rare or endangered species or other elements should be accuratelyindicated on the site plan(s).Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 28 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportNatural veld - goodcondition ESport fieldNatural veldwith scatteredaliens ECultivated landNatural veld withheavy alieninfestation EPaved surfaceS1 and S2Velddominated byalien species EBuilding orother structureGardensS1 and S2Bare soilIf any of the boxes marked with an “ E “is ticked, please consult an appropriate specialist toassist in the completion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn’thave the necessary expertise.5. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREACross the land uses and/or prominent features that currently occur within a 500m radius of thesite and give a description of how this influences the application or may be impacted upon bythe application:Land use character Description (Applicable to S1 and S2)Natural area YES Drainage line to southwest and naturalvegetation to southeast. Should a leak in theunderground storage tanks (USTs)/ pipingoccur/ or a spill result and shouldappropriate design, monitoring andadherence to the Geohydrological specialiststudy not have been undertaken, there ispotential for pollution to occur of theadjacent drainage line and ultimately theMdloti River situated towards the southwest.Low density residentialNOMedium density residentialNOHigh density residentialNOInformal residentialNORetail commercial & warehousing YES Not developed as yet, but possibly imminentin the future, dependent on Dube TradePort(DTP) developments. A PFS will provide anadded convenience to development withinthe DTP.Light industrial YES Not developed as yet, but possibly imminentin the future, dependent on Dube TradePort(DTP) developments. A PFS will provide anadded convenience to development withinthe DTP.Medium industrialNOHeavy industrialNOPower stationNOOffice/consulting room YES Not developed as yet, but possibly imminentin the future, dependent on Dube TradePort(DTP) developments. A PFS will provide anadded convenience to development withinthe DTP.Military or police base/station/compound NOSpoil heap or slimes damNOQuarry, sand or borrow pitNODepartment of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 29 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportDam or reservoirNOHospital/medical centreNOSchool/ crecheNOTertiary education facilityNOChurchNOOld age homeNOSewage treatment plantNOTrain station or shunting yardNORailway lineNOMajor road (4 lanes or more) YES Refer to Traffic Impact Assessmentprepared by Aurecon (Appendix D)Airport YES The PFS is required for the optimalfunctioning of the airport and for theconvenience of airport usersHarbourNOSport facilitiesNOGolf courseNOPolo fieldsNOFilling stationNOLandfill or waste treatment siteNOPlantationNOAgricultureNORiver, stream or wetland YES Drainage line to southwest, which drainsinto the Mdloti River and Mount MorelandWetlands. Should a leak in the undergroundstorage tanks (USTs)/ piping occur/ or a spillresult and should appropriate design,monitoring and adherence to theGeohydrological specialist study not havebeen undertaken, there is potential forpollution to occur of the adjacent drainageline and ultimately the Mdloti River situatedtowards the southwest.Nature conservation areaNOMountain, hill or ridgeNOMuseumNOHistorical buildingNOProtected AreaNOGraveyardNOArchaeological siteNOOther land uses (describe)NO6. CULTURAL/ HISTORICAL FEATURESAre there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, asNOdefined in section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (ActNo. 25 of 1999), including archaeological or palaeontological sites, on orwithin 20m of the site?If YES, contact a specialist recommended by AMAFA to conduct a heritage impactassessment. The heritage impact assessment must be attached as an appendix to thisreport.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 30 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportBriefly explain the recommendations N/Aof the specialist:Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way?NOIs it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National HeritageNOResources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?If YES, please submit the necessary application to AMAFA and attach proof thereof to thisreport.SECTION D: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION1. ADVERTISEMENTThe person conducting a public participation process must take into account any guidelinesapplicable to public participation as contemplated in section 24J of the Act and must give noticeto all potential interested and affected parties of the application which is subjected to publicparticipation by—(a)(b)(c)(d)fixing a notice board (of a size at least 60cm by 42cm; and must display the requiredinformation in lettering and in a format as may be determined by the competentauthority) at a place conspicuous to the public at the boundary or on the fence of—(i) the site where the activity to which the application relates is or is to beundertaken; and(ii) any alternative site mentioned in the application;giving written notice to—(i) the owner or person in control of that land if the applicant is not the owner orperson in control of the land;(ii) the occupiers of the site where the activity is or is to be undertaken or to anyalternative site where the activity is to be undertaken;(iii) owners and occupiers of land adjacent to the site where the activity is or is tobe undertaken or to any alternative site where the activity is to be undertaken;(iv) the municipal councillor of the ward in which the site or alternative site issituated and any organisation of ratepayers that represent the community inthe area;(v)(vi)the local and district municipality which has jurisdiction in the area;any organ of state having jurisdiction in respect of any aspect of the activity (asidentified in the application form for the environmental authorization of thisproject); and(vii) any other party as required by the competent authority;placing an advertisement in—(i) one local newspaper; or(ii) any official Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providingpublic notice of applications or other submissions made in terms of theseRegulations;placing an advertisement in at least one provincial newspaper or national newspaper, ifthe activity has or may have an impact that extends beyond the boundaries of themetropolitan or district municipality in which it is or will be undertaken: Provided thatthis paragraph need not be complied with if an advertisement has been placed in anofficial Gazette referred to in subregulation 54(c)(ii); andDepartment of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 31 of 46

Basic Assessment Report(e)using reasonable alternative methods, as agreed to by the competent authority, inthose instances where a person is desiring of but unable to participate in the processdue to—(i) illiteracy;(ii) disability; or(iii) any other disadvantage.[Refer to Appendix E: Comments and Response Report for all details relating to the PublicParticipation Process undertaken for the proposed development]2. CONTENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICESA notice board, advertisement or notices must:(a) indicate the details of the application which is subjected to public participation; and(b) state—(i) that an application for environmental authorization has been submitted to theKZN Department of Agriculture, Environmental Affairs and Rural Developmentin terms of the EIA Regulations, 2010;(ii)(iii) a brief project description that includes the nature and location of the activity towhich the application relates;(iv)(iv)where further information on the application can be obtained; andthe manner in which and the person to whom representations in respect of theapplication may be made.[Refer to Appendix E: Comments and Response Report for all details relating to the PublicParticipation Process undertaken for the proposed development]3. PLACEMENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICESWhere the proposed activity may have impacts that extend beyond the municipal area where itis located, a notice must be placed in at least one provincial newspaper or national newspaper,indicating that an application will be submitted to the competent authority in terms of theseregulations, the nature and location of the activity, where further information on the proposedactivity can be obtained and the manner in which representations in respect of the applicationcan be made, unless a notice has been placed in any Gazette that is published specifically forthe purpose of providing notice to the public of applications made in terms of the EIAregulations.Advertisements and notices must make provision for all alternatives.[Refer to Appendix E: Comments and Response Report for all details relating to the PublicParticipation Process undertaken for the proposed development]Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 32 of 46

Basic Assessment Report4. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE PROCESSThe EAP must ensure that the public participation process is according to that prescribed inregulation 54 of the EIA Regulations, 2010, but may deviate from the requirements ofsubregulation 54(2) in the manner agreed by the KZN Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs and Rural Development as appropriate for this application. Specialattention should be given to the involvement of local community structures such as WardCommittees, ratepayers associations and traditional authorities where appropriate.Please note that public concerns that emerge at a later stage that should have been addressedmay cause the competent authority to withdraw any authorisation it may have issued if itbecomes apparent that the public participation process was inadequate.[Refer to Appendix E: Comments and Response Report for all details relating to the PublicParticipation Process undertaken for the proposed development]5. COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORTThe practitioner must record all comments and respond to each comment of the public beforethis application is submitted. The comments and responses must be captured in a commentsand response report as prescribed in the EIA regulations (regulation 57 in the EIA Regulations,2010) and be attached as Appendix E to this report.[Refer to Appendix E: Comments and Response Report for all details relating to the PublicParticipation Process undertaken for the proposed development]6. PARTICIPATION BY DISTRICT, LOCAL AND TRADITIONAL AUTHORITIESDistrict, local and traditional authorities (where applicable) are all key interested and affectedparties in each application and no decision on any application will be made before the relevantlocal authority is provided with the opportunity to give input. The planning and theenvironmental sections of the local authority must be informed of this application and providedwith an opportunity to comment.Has any comment been received from the district municipality?YESIf “YES”, briefly describe the feedback below (also attach any correspondence to and from this authority withregard to this application):Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 33 of 46

Basic Assessment ReporteThekwini Municipality, Development Planning, Environment and Management Unit, DevelopmentPlanning Department, Land Use Management Branch (02 June 2011):eThekwini Municipality had the following comments, with reference to the Background Information Document asfollows:1. eThekwini Electricity DepartmentThe electricity department has no objection, however please note:- It is the responsibility of the applicant to check eThekwini Electricity’s mains record, held in the drawingOffice at eThekwini Electricity Head Quarters. In addition should any overhead line and/or servitude beaffected, the specific permission of the Head: Electricity must be sought regarding the proposeddevelopment.- The relocation of electrical services, if required, in order to accommodate the installation will be carriedout at the expense of the applicant.2. Environmental Planning and Climate protection Department- This Department has no objection.3. Land Use Management Branch- Please provide this Branch with an approved Survey Diagram for the preferred Site and alternative Sitelocations. Please note that the site is zoned Special Zone (Airport) and Petrol Filling Station land use interms of Umhlanga Town Planning Scheme is freely permitted use in SZ (Airport).4. Framework Planning BranchThis department raised the following comments:- The proposed use is a free entry use in terms of Table C: Special Zone 10 (Airport) and both thepreferred and alternative sites falls within the confines of the Special Zone 10 of the Umhlanga TownPlanning Scheme No 1 in the course of preparation.- The applicant is required to provide a summary of the draw-down of development rights to be used forthis development to enable this Branch to keep track of the overall development controls used up fromthe Rights Bank.- The proposal is required to align with the Record of Decision (RoD) dated 23 August 2007 and a revisedRoD dated 29 October 2008. All conditions of the Rod are to be complied with.5. eThekwini Transport AuthorityA Traffic Impact Assessment is to be submitted for comment.6. Environmental Health DepartmentThe Environmental Health Departments comments regarding the proposed petrol filling station at KSIA are asfollows:The environmental health department does not have any objection to the proposed development. However, it ishereby recorded that the following areas of concern be addressed in detail by the developer for the scrutiny bythis department:- Building plans are to be submitted and approved by the eThekwini Municipality prior to commencing anywork on site.- All food handling shops will be required to formally submit (and await approval) internal layout plans tothe municipality. Timeous business license applications are to be lodged for each food shop.- All work during the pre-construction, construction and operational phases must comply with the OSHAct.- It is assumed that fuel to the proposed site will be transported by road. In this regard, it will benecessary to carry out a “Transport Risk Assessment”.- Details regarding Design Principles of tanks and associated infrastructure in terms of the relevant SANSCodes (10400, 10131, 10089 etc) must be specified.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 34 of 46

Basic Assessment Report- Describe what measures are in place to prevent fuel spillage and leakage from occurring from theinstallation. Details pertaining to: spill containment, leak detection, soil vapour testing, electronic levelmonitoring versus manual “dips”, oil/water separators, scheduled integrity testing,- Emergency response plan etc. must be provided.- In the interest of minimizing air pollution impacts, a vapour recovery system should be incorporated inthe design.- Details regarding solid waste disposal: hazardous and non- hazardous waste disposal must beprovided.- Provide an overall EMP for the operations relating to construction and operational phases.Does the proposed installation have any MHI liability?7. Geotechnical Engineering Branch- No major geotechnical flaws that we are aware of. As stated in the BID, a hydrogeological assessmentof at least a 1km radius around the site must be done as required by DWA.8. Fire Safety- This Department has no objection to the proposed development provided that plans are submitted forapproval.9. Durban Solid Waste- The Basic Assessment needs to address the generation, storage, transportation and disposal of bothhazardous and general waste during construction and most importantly during operation.eThekwini Municipality, Fire and Disaster Management and Health (14 March 2011):Mr. Neil Larratt thanked Mr. Clint McKenzie for keeping him informed regarding the project and its MHIrequirements and asked that he and Mr. Vasie Pillay be included in correspondence along with Mr. McKenzie.eThekwini Municipality, Transport Authority(14 June 2011):Mr. Kellock of Aurecon requested comment from the ETA on the proposed development and an indication onwhether it affects any transport infrastructure under the ETA’s jurisdiction. Mr. Naidoo responded that the DubeTradePort had appointed TECHSO to prepare a new TIA for the DTP precinct. The report is expected to befinalised and approved around October 2011. The existing TIA prepared by GOBA in 2008 is dated and there areconcerns with the underlying assumptions on which their proposals were based and should therefore not be usedas base for any future developments within the DTP/ KSIA precinct. Aurecon were advised by Mr. Naidoo that itwould be premature to carry out a TIA for a proposed PFS in the DTP/ KSIA precinct based on the existing GOBATIA. The TIA for the PFS proposal should be prepared based on the new TIA for the DTP precinct.(23 August 2011)Mr. Kellock of Aurecon requested comment from the ETA on the proposed development and any related TIAissues. Mr. Naidoo responded that the ETA, due to heavy workloads will only be commenting on applicationsformally submitted as part of the EIA or development application.Has any comment been received from the local municipality?If “YES”, briefly describe the feedback below (also attach any correspondence to and from this authority withregard to this application):As aboveHas any comment been received from a traditional authority?If “YES”, briefly describe the feedback below (also attach any correspondence to and from this authority withregard to this application):N/ADepartment of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 35 of 46

Basic Assessment Report7. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERSAny stakeholder that has a direct interest in the site or property, such as servitude holdersand service providers, should be informed of the application and be provided with theopportunity to comment.Has any comment been received from stakeholders?YESIf “YES”, briefly describe the feedback below (also attach copies of any correspondence to and from thestakeholders to this application):Government Departments/ Service Holders/ Service Providers:Department of Transport (01 June 2011):Mr. Kellock of Aurecon requested comment from the DoT on the proposed development and an indication onwhether it affects any transport infrastructure under the DoT’s jurisdiction. Mr. Ryan responded that the DoT hasno interest in the application as no Provincial Roads are affected.South African National Roads Agency (SANRAL) (01 June 2011):Mr. Kellock of Aurecon requested comment from SANRAL on the proposed development and an indication onwhether it affects any transport infrastructure under SANRAL’s jurisdiction.Mr. Wilson responded as follows:As much of the primary traffic will be generated from the N2 SANRAL should register as an IAP. The facilityproposed will not create additional traffic on the N2 other than fuel delivery, which to SANRAL remains anunfulfilled condition of the original RoD for the KSIA site.Transportation of fuel by road will always be a risk and the need to service the new airport’s need by roaddeliveries was always supposed to be temporary. This proposal merely increases the existing risk. Inconsequence, SANRAL cannot support the envisaged facility without a clearer understanding of how ACSAintends to deal permanently with the previously identified risk.SANRAL will not allow any signposting on the N2 advertising or informing of the facility believing that the potentialattraction is limited to those already accessing the airport for travel beyond the Durban environs. If there is anyintention to attract passing traffic on the N2, SANRAL will similarly resist the application.SANRAL requested to be registered as an IAP.Department of Agriculture, Environmental Affairs and Rural Development (DAEARD) (29 September 2011):SRK requested clarity that the application should indeed go through the Provincial DAEARD office and notNational DEA. Ms. Mabanga of the DAEARD responded that the application will indeed be handled by theProvincial DAEARD.Other Stakeholders:Ms. Kate Ralfe, Dube TradePort (10 June 2011):Dube Tradeport (DTP) provided the following comments on the Background Information Document (BID) andnoted objection to the application based on the following grounds:1. Lack of clarity around the procurement of the service provider- Specific reference has been made to Sasol as the service provider in the BID document. However, DTPare unclear as to what procurement processes were followed regarding this, and whether all serviceproviders were given an opportunity to submit a proposal to lease the proposed site. While thedocument states that this is a relocation, one has to ask why this was not catered for in the planningprocess and accommodated in the master plan.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 36 of 46

Basic Assessment Report- ACSA is a public entity and is bound by regulations in the PFMA, and fair and equitable procurementforms part of this. DTP would like ACSA to explain why none of the retailers operating in the passengerterminal of the old Durban International Airport were relocated, yet ACSA feel the need to relocate thisservice provider. ACSA went out on procurement to attract retail tenants to operate in the newpassenger terminal at KSIA, yet regarding the service station ACSA appear to have followed a closedprocess. DTP would like to know what rights have been accorded to Sasol in this regard.2. Inconsistent with the Dube Tradeport Master Plan- By way of background, there are three separate land owners on the Dube Tradeport site, namely ACSA,Dube Tradeport Corporation (DTPC), and a Joint Venture Company comprising of the two parties. Thevarious landholdings are shown on Attachment marked 1. The service station as indicated on Figure1a and 1b of the BID document indicate that the proposed site for the service station is positioned onthe current staff parking on the aviation precinct, owned by ACSA.- ACSA and DTC are organs of state. They are co-developers of the Dube Tradeport site and haveagreed to co-operate with one another and structure their relationship to ensure the success of theTradeport.- In the spirit f this interrelationship DTPC and ACSA have co-operated with one another on matters ofmutual interest (such as the environmental and planning processes), and have also concluded a Co-Operation Agreement and a Shareholders Agreement to regulate the relationship.- In the Co-Operation Agreement DTPC and ACSA agreed to plan and co-ordinate the rezoning of thewhole of the Tradeport site for future development, and agreed to make all decisions concerning thedevelopment, construction, management and operation of the Tradeport in line with the master planningdocuments.- DTPC and ACSA have committed themselves to the Master Plan for Phase 1 of the Dube Tradeportdevelopment, and have agreed to review the Master Plan in five year cycles. The Master Plancontemplated a fuel station, and stated that it would be situated in such a way as to serve the variousTradeport Zones (i.e. not only the airport).The Master Plan has not been changed in this regard. ACSA were fully involved in the master planningprocess. The relocation of the service station at the old Durban International Airport was never raised.Nowhere in the current approved master plan has a site been designated for a service station. If ACSAwere so concerned with a relocation DTP would like ACSA to explain why ACSA did not cater for this inthe master plan, which was approved jointly by both ACSA and DTPC.3. Economic Concerns- From an economic point of view, a fuel station is obviously a desirable land use and has the potential togenerate significant income for the land owner in question. However, should ACSA pursue thisdevelopment it is unlikely that more than one fuel station would be approved on the Dube Tradeport sitein the foreseeable future, due to the viability of a second petrol filling station.- As mentioned above, both ACSA and DTP are shareholders in a joint venture Company, known as LaMercy JV Property Investments (the JV). The shareholders agreement for this company clearly states:(a) That DTPC and ACSA would avoid a conflict between their own interests and the interests of the JVCo;(b) That their own interests are subservient to those of the JV Co;(c) That if DTPC or ACSA were approached to conduct in their individual capacities the same or similarbusiness to that conducted by the JV Co then they would notify the JV Co of the proposed opportunity,and the JV Co would be entitled to negotiate and take up the business opportunity.- In accordance with this, the following due process, the idea of a service station on JV land wasdiscussed by the board of directors, and a decision was made to request proposals and procure aninvestor. ACSA, as shareholders in the JV Company, were involved with this process. The requests forproposals document, as well as the adjudication of bids, was done jointly by ACSA and DTP- asshareholders of the JV. ACSA are now seeking to undermine this by relocating the service provider fromthe old Durban International Airport site.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 37 of 46

Basic Assessment Report4. Inconsistent with the planning framework for the site- Both the preferred site, as well as the alternative site as indicated in the diagrams fall within the aviationprecinct. As a way of background, the DTP site is partially zoned “Special Zone 10: Airport”, with thereminder of the site zoned as “undetermined”. A diagram showing the outline of a special zone 10 ismarked “Attachment 2”.- Special Zone 10: Airport is flexible in terms of the types of uses that can occur within it, however theregulations clearly state that a development framework plan is to be prepared, to guide development onsite. This framework plan outlines a package of plans that need to be developed and complied with. Thesite is essentially divided into precincts, which provide detail around the distribution of land uses.- The precinct plan for the airport precinct does not, remotely, show a service station, and an extract fromthis is shown in attachment 3. As such, we believe that from a statutory point of view an amendment tothe existing aviation precinct plan will need to be approved by council prior to any application beingaccepted. The proposals, in their current form, are in stark contradiction with the planning framework ofthe site.- The two sites in question are currently used as staff parking, and to park coaches. These sites weredesignated for certain uses through the planning process. If the proposed site was to be developed as aservice station, this would result in a loss of parking for the overall development and will possiblycompromise the effective operation of the airport.5. Traffic ConcernsThe land close to the proposed site, and proposed alternative site, has been earmarked for a futuremultilevel interchange. This interchange will become necessary as the Tradeport starts to developfurther. A point of concern is the proximity of the service station to this interchange, and the potentialeffect that this could have on the infrastructure and design.Ms. Angie Wilken, Mount Moreland Ratepayers and Environmental Association (10 June 2011):Mount Moreland Ratepayers and Environmental Association, had the following comments on the BackgroundInformation Document:- The association would like to see details in the basic assessment of site drainage and storm watermanagement.- In the event of a spill what is the procedure?- Is drainage from this site into Froggy Pond wetland?BP, c/o Mr W. Le Febour and Mr. J. Marshall (16 May 2011 and 10 June 2011):Mr. Le Febour asked that BP be registered as an IAP and asked for clarity on the process/ procedure to follow.The following comments on the Background Information Document were raised:- BP was successful in a proposal to develop a Petrol Filling Station (PFS) at King Shaka InternationalAirport and Dube TradePort. The proposal was forwarded in August 2010 in response to La Mercy JVProperty Investments (Pty) Ltd request for submissions.- SRK’s Background Information Document indicates that the above mentioned PFS is to be located inclose proximity to BP’s site.- As both sites have been planned by ACSA, it is possible that there is sufficient demand to support bothproposed sites. However, this issue needs to be addressed as part of the Environmental Process.Mr. Marshall on SRK’s request provided further information on BP’s PFS proposal.Shell, Mr. McRae (11 May 2011):Mr. McRae requested telephonically to be registered as an IAP and that he be provided with a copy of the BID.Mr. Geoff Pullan – Ward 58 Councilor (10 June 2011):Mr. Pullan provided the following comment::As a Councilor in this area, Ward 58, I have no objection to a petrol filling station in the King Shaka airportprecinct - PROVIDED - there are no future counter objections from King Shaka against applications for any petrolfilling stations in the vicinity of the N2.Mr. Richard Evans, Richard Evans & Associates (13 September 2011):Mr. Evans inquired as to the status of the environmental application on the 13 September 2011, SRK respondedvia email and Mr. Evans responded back thanking SRK for the email, the contents of which were noted andfurther advice was awaited in due course.Mr. G. Veerasamy, Tongaat Hulett Developments (12 May 2011):Requested clarity of the fuel quantities and the PFS.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 38 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportMr. Kevin Duke, Kevin Duke Attorneys (03 August 2011):Mr. Duke, who represents a number of property developers telephonically requested to be registered as an IAPand requested a copy of the BID be emailed to him.Mr. Duke had the following queries:1. In terms of the food-outlet component, does Sasol have a preference towards certain companies, if sowhom?2. In terms of the Petrol Station Managers, as well as the fast food outlets, does Sasol have a preferencetowards BEE Companies? If so: to what degree of compliance would be expected, and would Sasolfavor companies with woman directors/owners?3. Within the layout plans contained in the BID, what is envisioned in each section, and what are thedimensions for each division?Mr. Mohammed Dada – Tongaat Petrol Station (17 July 2011):Mr. Dada requested telephonically to be registered as an IAP and that he be provided with a copy of the BID.Mr. Vasu Naidoo – Property Developer (02 August 2011):Mr. Naidoo requested telephonically to be registered as an IAP and that he be provided with a copy of the BID.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 39 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportSECTION E: IMPACT ASSESSMENTThe assessment of impacts must adhere to the requirements in the EIA Regulations, 2010, andshould take applicable official guidelines into account. The issues raised by interested andaffected parties should also be addressed in the assessment of impacts.1. ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIESList the main issues raised by interested and affected parties.The following main environmental issues have been identified by IAPs:• Socio-economic impacts (a specialist study has been undertaken to assess impacts, Appendix D, Draft BAReport);• Impact of fuel spillage or leakage (a specialist study has been undertaken to assess impacts, Appendix D,Draft BA Report);• Stormwater management (a specialist study has been undertaken to assess impacts, Appendix D, DraftBA Report);• Traffic impacts (a specialist study has been undertaken to assess impacts, Appendix D, Draft BA Report);• Health & Safety;• Fire and explosion impacts; and• Solid and liquid waste generation and management.Response from the practitioner to the issues raised by the interested and affected parties (A fullresponse must be given in the Comments and Response Report that must be attached asAppendix E to this report):Refer to Comments and Responses Report (Appendix E).2. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN,CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASES ASWELL AS PROPOSED MANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSEDMITIGATION MEASURES[Refer to Appendix G, Impact Assessment Report]2.1. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASEa. Site alternativesList the potential impacts associated with site alternatives that are likely to occur during the planning and designphase:Alternative S1 (preferred alternative)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Alternative S2 (if any)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:No-go alternative (compulsory)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 40 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportIndicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above:Alternative S1Alternative S2b. Process, technology, layout or other alternativesList the impacts associated with any process, technology, layout or other alternatives that are likely to occur duringthe planning and design phase (please list impacts associated with each alternative separately):Alternative A1 (preferred alternative)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Alternative A2 (if any)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:No-go alternative (compulsory)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above:Alternative A1: Alternative A2:2.2. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION PHASEa. Site alternativesList the potential impacts associated with site alternatives that are likely to occur during the construction phase:Alternative S1 (preferred site)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Alternative S2 (if any)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:No-go alternative (compulsory)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 41 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportIndicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above:Alternative S1Alternative S2b. Process, technology, layout or other alternativesList the impacts associated with process, technology, layout or other alternatives that are likely to occur during theconstruction phase (please list impacts associated with each alternative separately):Alternative A1 (preferred alternative)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Alternative A2Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:No-go alternative (compulsory)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above:Alternative A1: Alternative A2:2.3. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE OPERATIONAL PHASEa. Site alternativesList the potential impacts associated with site alternatives that are likely to occur during the operational phase:Alternative S1 (preferred alternative)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Alternative S2 (if any)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:No-go alternative (compulsory)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above:Alternative S1Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalAlternative S2Basic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 42 of 46

Basic Assessment Reportb. Process, technology, layout or other alternativesList the impacts associated with process, technology, layout or other alternatives that are likely to occur during theoperational phase (please list impacts associated with each alternative separately):Alternative A1 (preferred alternative)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Alternative A2Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:No-go alternative (compulsory)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above:Alternative A1Alternative A22.4. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE DECOMISSIONING OR CLOSUREPHASEa. Site alternativesList the potential impacts associated with site alternatives that are likely to occur during the decommissioning orclosure phase:Alternative S1 (preferred alternative)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Alternative S2Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:No-go alternative (compulsory)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above:Alternative S1Alternative S2b. Process, technology, layout or other alternativesDepartment of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 43 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportList the impacts associated with process, technology, layout or other alternatives that are likely to occur during thedecommissioning or closure phase (please list impacts associated with each alternative separately):Alternative A1 (preferred alternative)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Alternative A2Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:No-go alternative (compulsory)Direct impacts:Indirect impacts:Cumulative impacts:Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above:Alternative A1Alternative A22.5. PROPOSED MONITORING AND AUDITINGFor each phase of the project and for each alternative, please indicate how identified impacts and mitigation will bemonitored and/or audited.Alternative S1 (preferred site)Alternative S2Alternative A1 (preferredalternative)Alternative A23. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTTaking the assessment of potential impacts into account, please provide an environmentalimpact statement that summarises the impact that the proposed activity and its alternativesmay have on the environment after the management and mitigation of impacts have beentaken into account, with specific reference to types of impact, duration of impacts, likelihood ofpotential impacts actually occurring and the significance of impacts.[Refer to Appendix G, Impact Assessment Report]Alternative S1 (preferred site)Alternative S2Alternative A1 (preferred alternative)Alternative A2Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 44 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportNo-go alternative (compulsory)SECTION F.RECOMMENDATION OF EAPIs the information contained in this report and the documentation attachedhereto in the view of the EAP sufficient to make a decision in respect of thisreport?If “NO”, please contact the KZN Department of Agriculture, EnvironmentalAffairs and Rural Development regarding the further requirements for yourreport.YESIf “YES”, please attach the draft EMPr as Appendix F to this report and list any recommendedconditions, including mitigation measures that should be considered for inclusion in anyauthorisation that may be granted by the competent authority in respect of the application:[Refer to Appendix G, Impact Assessment Report]Draft EMPr has been attached in Appendix F of this reportDepartment of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 45 of 46

Basic Assessment ReportSECTION G: APPENDIXESThe following appendixes must be attached as appropriate:Appendix A: Site plan(s)Appendix B: PhotographsAppendix C: Facility illustration(s)Appendix D: Specialist reportsAppendix E: Comments and responses reportAppendix F: Draft Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)Appendix G: Other informationDepartment of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 46 of 46