Basic Assessment Report - SRK

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Basic Assessment Report(b)the type of activity to be undertaken;The ACSA preferred site is currently used as an ACSA staff car parking area, whilst the ACSAalternative site is used as a coach staging area and is landscaped. At present no alternativeactivities/ land use for the sites are proposed other than their current use and proposed PFSuse. To accommodate the existing site uses should these be replaced with the proposed PFSuse, ACSA is able to provide sufficient alternative staff parking (preferred site) and only aportion of the coach staging area will be used, should development of the alternative site occur.(c)the design or layout of the activity;Three layout options (A, B and C) have been proposed by Sasol (Appendix A). The entranceand exit positions and locations of the USTs are identical in each layout option. The layoutoptions vary only in the positioning of the forecourt, convenience shop and fast food outlets.Sasol have indicated in terms of ease of development of the site and economic feasibility, thatlayout Option A is the preferred option.(d)the technology to be used in the activity;Apart from the standard PFS technology proposed, given the sensitivities of the adjacent Mdloticatchment, a double walled “Permatank” and additional monitoring has been recommended. Inaddition Stage 1 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Vapour Recovery Systems, as approved by ACSAshould be installed onto fuel dispensing nozzles at the refuelling and forecourt areas.(e)the operational aspects of the activity; andNo alternative operational aspects of the activity are proposed, again standard industry PFSoperational procedures will be applied(f)the option of not implementing the activityShould ACSA not undertake the construction of the PFS, the sites will remain as is and willcontinue to be used as the ACSA staff car parking (preferred site) and as the coach stagingarea (alternative site). The KSIA will however remain without an operational PFS and airportusers will continue to experience inconvenience in not being able to attain fuel for their vehiclesat a close and convenient location. The nearest PFS is located 6km away, outside of the airporttraffic flow routes. The other JV sites proposed will have development delays due to re-zoningapplications being required (refer to discussion in Section 4 (a) above).Sections B 5 – 15 below should be completed for each alternative.Note: This has been undertaken for only the two ACSA site alternatives (preferred andalternative site) and not the proposed JV Sites.5. ACTIVITY POSITIONIndicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the sitefor each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees, minutes and seconds. Listalternative sites were applicable.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 18 of 46
Basic Assessment ReportLatitude (S):Longitude (E):Alternative:Alternative S1 2 (preferred or only 29° 37‘ 17.77“ 31° 06‘ 1.90“site alternative) E1 - ACSA SiteAlternative S2 (if any) E2 - ACSA 29° 37‘ 15.66“ 31° 05‘ 58.25“SiteAlternative S3 (if any) A1 - JV 29 o 37‘ 39.00 “ 31 o 7‘ 18.09 “SiteA2 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 42.16 “ 31 o 7‘ 7.38 “B1 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 41.63 “ 31 o 6‘ 39.44 “B2 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 43.82 “ 31 o 6‘ 30.41 “C1 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 24.80 “ 31 o 5‘ 57.31 “C2 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 20.15 “ 31 o 5‘ 51.92 “D1 - JV Site 29 o 37‘ 6.98 “ 31 o 5‘ 0.64 “D2 - JV Site 29 o 36‘ 59.12 “ 31 o 5‘ 9.26 “In the case of linear activities:Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E):Alternative S1 (preferred or onlyroute alternative)• Starting point of the activity• Middle point of the activity• End point of the activityAlternative S2 (if any)• Starting point of the activity• Middle point of the activity• End point of the activityAlternative S3 (if any)• Starting point of the activity• Middle point of the activity• End point of the activityFor route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with coordinatestaken every 500m along the route for each alternative alignment.6. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITYIndicate the physical size of the preferred activity/technology as well as alternativeactivities/technologies (footprints):Alternative:Size of the activity:Alternative A1 3 (preferred activity alternative) Approx. 5000 m 2Alternative A2 (if any)N/AAlternative A3 (if any)N/Aor, for linear activities:2 “Alternative S..” refer to site alternatives.3 “Alternative A..” refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives.Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs & RuralDevelopment, KwaZulu-NatalBasic Assessment Report 2010Version 2: August 2010Page 19 of 46
Page 1 and 2: Basic Assessment ReportKZN Agricult
Page 3 and 4: Basic Assessment ReportName of repr
Page 5 and 6: Basic Assessment ReportSECTION B: A
Page 7 and 8: Basic Assessment Report• The UST
Page 9 and 10: Basic Assessment ReportAll pipe-wor
Page 11 and 12: Basic Assessment Report3. ACTIVITY
Page 13 and 14: Basic Assessment ReportThe traffic
Page 15 and 16: Basic Assessment ReportFrom a traff
Page 17: Basic Assessment ReportPlanning Sta
Page 21 and 22: Basic Assessment Report areas with
Page 23 and 24: Basic Assessment ReportNational Amb
Page 25 and 26: Basic Assessment ReportWill the act
Page 27 and 28: Basic Assessment Report1. GRADIENT
Page 29 and 30: Basic Assessment ReportNatural veld
Page 31 and 32: Basic Assessment ReportBriefly expl
Page 33 and 34: Basic Assessment Report4. DETERMINA
Page 35 and 36: Basic Assessment Report- Describe w
Page 37 and 38: Basic Assessment Report- ACSA is a
Page 39 and 40: Basic Assessment ReportMr. Kevin Du
Page 41 and 42: Basic Assessment ReportIndicate mit
Page 43 and 44: Basic Assessment Reportb. Process,
Page 45 and 46: Basic Assessment ReportNo-go altern

Basic Assessment Report - SRK

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?