FACULTY REPORTSare paid more because they are able to produce more, andthis higher productivity is itself a reflection <strong>of</strong> education,more and better technology and capital, and a pattern <strong>of</strong> incentivesthat make the U.S. economy one <strong>of</strong> the richest inthe world. This insight is <strong>of</strong>ten lost in the public debate oninternational trade. “Cheap labor” to an economist is laborthat produces less, and these differencesin productivity must be takeninto account when evaluating thetrade potential <strong>of</strong> an economy.Why Countries TradeDuring the 1980s, theoretical explanations<strong>of</strong> international trade focusedon explaining the rapid growthin trade between countries at similarstages <strong>of</strong> economic development. Forexample, industrial countries exportand import automobiles from otherindustrial countries. The theoreticalexplanation <strong>of</strong> this intra-industrytrade is based on economies <strong>of</strong> scalethat allow firms in each nation tospecialize in a particular type <strong>of</strong> automobile,thereby <strong>of</strong>fering consumersa variety <strong>of</strong> choices. China’s rapidemergences as a major world traderevokes an older international tradetheory first developed by Swedisheconomists Eli Heckscher and BertilOhlin in the 1930s. The Heckscher-Ohlin model argues that trade occursbecause <strong>of</strong> different factor endowmentsthat give countries with lots <strong>of</strong>labor relative to capital a comparativeadvantage in producing goodswhich require more labor. In otherwords, trade in goods masks the underlyingtrade <strong>of</strong> factor services.The Heckscher-Ohlin model assumesthe same industries in differentcountries have the same laborproductivity, but countries specializein those industries which use theirown abundant factors the most intensively. An even oldertheory dates back to David Ricardo who wrote in the early1800s and whose ideas are still found in economic textbookstoday. Ricardian trade theory argues that comparativeadvantage reflects differences in labor productivity inthe same industry between countries, so countries will specializein activities where they have the highest labor productivity,and exchange these products with countries moreefficient at producing other goods.China’s rapid emergences as amajor world trader evokes anolder international trade theoryfirst developed by Swedisheconomists Eli Heckscher andBertil Ohlin in the 1930s.The Heckscher-Ohlin modelargues that trade occurs because<strong>of</strong> different factor endowmentsthat give countries with lots<strong>of</strong> labor relative to capital acomparative advantage inproducing goods which requiremore labor. In other words, tradein goods masks the underlyingtrade <strong>of</strong> factor services.All three <strong>of</strong> these theories can help explain differentfeatures <strong>of</strong> world trade today. Even for a developing nationlike China, 58 percent <strong>of</strong> international trade occurs withinthe same industries. This substantial figure reflects in partthe limitations <strong>of</strong> input output data, which only identifies48 separate industries. A finer categorization would nodoubt reduce the degree <strong>of</strong> intraindustrytrade. If we limit our focus totrade between different industries,and start out with the simplifyingHeckscher-Ohlin assumption thatthere are no substantial differences inlabor productivity among countries,we quickly reach some remarkableand implausible conclusions aboutthe trade potential <strong>of</strong> the Chineseeconomy.The Factor Content <strong>of</strong>Chinese TradeThe factor content <strong>of</strong> trade isbased on input output analysis whichconverts the value <strong>of</strong> any product intopayments to labor and capital thatwent into its production both directlyand indirectly. Hence we can measurethe factor payments necessary to producethe exports <strong>of</strong> a given country,and simply subtract the factor paymentsnecessary to produce thecountry’s imports to arrive at themeasured factor content <strong>of</strong> trade.Consider the production <strong>of</strong> textiles,China’s largest export industry. Theproduction <strong>of</strong> one million dollars <strong>of</strong>textile exports represents $660,000 inpayment to workers and $340,000 inpayment to capital. These paymentscan in turn be equated to the stock <strong>of</strong>capital and the number <strong>of</strong> workers bydividing by the rate <strong>of</strong> payment toeach factor, as illustrated in Figure 1(constructed with U.S. payments forcapital and labor).A similar computation can be made for chemicalproducts, China’s largest import. Chemical production ismore capital intensive so a larger share, equal to $0.43 perdollar, <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> chemical products represents paymentsto capital. Not surprisingly, China’s imports are onaverage more capital intensive than China’s exports, inaccordance with the Heckscher-Ohlin theory <strong>of</strong> trade.The Heckscher-Ohlin theory predicts that a country’sfactor content <strong>of</strong> trade is determined by the country’s own22 ❚ ANNUAL REPORT 20<strong>07</strong>-<strong>08</strong>
FACULTY REPORTSFigure 1: Measuring Factor Content$1 million <strong>of</strong>textile production equalspayments for ...... the services <strong>of</strong> $2.5 millionworth <strong>of</strong> capital(land, buildings, machinery)... the services <strong>of</strong> 14 workersfor one year.supply <strong>of</strong> labor and capital relative to the world supply. Alabor abundant country like China will only export the services<strong>of</strong> its “excess labor”. The excess is determined by subtractingfrom the country’s total labor supply the services<strong>of</strong> labor that the country will itself consume. For example,China accounts for 9 percent <strong>of</strong> world consumption, soChina is predicted to export the services <strong>of</strong> its own laborsupply <strong>of</strong> 720 million less what it uses in producing for thehome market, equal to 0.09 times the world labor supply <strong>of</strong>about 1.4 billion consumption (as measured by my sample<strong>of</strong> 33 countries). Hence China is predicted to export theservices <strong>of</strong> almost 600 million workers!Many empirical studies <strong>of</strong> the Heckscher-Ohlin modelhave shown that these predictions vastly over-predict thefactor content <strong>of</strong> world trade, and China is no exception. Infact, if we assume labor is as productive in China as in theU.S., my research indicates as <strong>of</strong> the year 2000 China onlyexported the services <strong>of</strong> 1.9 million workers. Of course thequestionable assumption is that China’s labor is equivalentto U.S. labor. Table 1 demonstrates that if wages are any indication,labor in the U.S. is much more productive thanlabor in China. A more subtle feature <strong>of</strong> this data is thatthese differences in productivity vary across sectors.A key element <strong>of</strong> my research is how to best accountfor differences in factor productivities when predicting thefactor content <strong>of</strong> trade. Using input output data, I first determinehow much U.S. labor and capital using U.S. productiontechniques would be necessary to produce China’sGDP. By comparing this to the actual amount <strong>of</strong> China’slabor and capital, I can determine the productivity <strong>of</strong>China’s labor and capital relative to the U.S. These productivityadjustments equate one person-year <strong>of</strong> labor in theUnited States to about 17 person-years <strong>of</strong> labor in China.Once these differences are taken into account, China ispredicted to export the services <strong>of</strong> only 3.3 million “U.S.equivalent” workers, much closer to China’s measured laborcontent.The productivity-adjusted Heckscher-Ohlin predictions<strong>of</strong> the factor content <strong>of</strong> trade are highly accurate for mostcountries. In a group <strong>of</strong> 33 countries, the predictions correctlydetermine whether a country will export labor orcapital in 59 <strong>of</strong> 66 possible cases. The predictions also rankcountries from largest factor exporter to largest factor importerwith a high degree <strong>of</strong> accuracy when compared to themeasured factor content rankings. The range <strong>of</strong> productivitydifferences among countries reflects different skills <strong>of</strong> theworkforce and different areas <strong>of</strong> industrial expertise thatconfer comparative advantage over and above the number<strong>of</strong> workers or the dollar value <strong>of</strong> capital, as Ricardian tradetheory first suggested. China has gained world ascendancyexporting labor-intensive goods with a very low level <strong>of</strong>labor productivity. As China’s labor force improves in skills,China’s role in world trade will continue to evolve, but nodoubt remain momentous. ■ORFALEA COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ❚ 23