13.07.2015 Views

jiafm, 2010-32(2) april-june. - forensic medicine

jiafm, 2010-32(2) april-june. - forensic medicine

jiafm, 2010-32(2) april-june. - forensic medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

% ageJ Indian Acad Forensic Med, <strong>32</strong>(2) ISSN 0971-09739. MC Millan DE, Wengen GR. Effects of curriculumand format changes in a medical pharmacology course.Acad Medicine 1987; 62: 836-41.10. Kaufman, D.M., Mann, K.V. Comparing students'attitude in problem-based and conventional curricula.Academic Medicine. 1996; 71: 1096-1099.11. Zohra Moa L deli MS. A Survey on the student‟sexam anxiety in the Fatemeh (P.B. V.H.) college onNursing and Midwifery. Journal of Medical EducationDevelopment Centre 2005 1 (2): 65-72.12. Nozar nakhaee MD. Investigation of medical studentsopinions on teaching and its frequency. Studies inDevelopment of Medical education. Journal of MedicalEducation Development Centre 2005; 1(2) 57-64.13. Duffield, K.E., Spencer, J.A. A survey of medicalstudents' views about the purposes and fairness ofassessment. Medical Education. 2002; 36: 879-886.37.63%21.5%11.76%Fig.1. 2 nd Professional Course21.5%30.11%PathologyFig. 2. Integration in clinical subjectPharmacologyMicrobiologyForensic Medicine8.46% Total70.04%PartialNot at allTable1.Opinion regarding teaching Methodology andreformsParameter % ofstudents(n)Most interesting1. Lecture2. Practical3. Seminars4. Tutorial5. Group discussionDuration of the course Sufficient1 Yes2 NoObjective structured practicalexamination1 Yes2 No18.27 % (85)36.98 % (172)5.31 %(20)8.46 % (30)29.98 % (158)59.13 % (275)40.87 % (190)82.79 % (385)17.21 % (80)Table 2Opinion regarding learning StrategiesParameter% of students (n)Study subjects from1. Lecture only6.53 % (35)2. Textbook only 21.50 % (100)3. Textbook + Lecture 60.21 % (280)4. Own notes11.76 % (50)Pattern of study1. Regularly2. Occasionally3. Only during exams4. Do not studyGrasping power of thesubject1. Good2. Fair3. Poor<strong>32</strong>.25 % (150)26.88 % (125)<strong>32</strong>.25 % (150)8.62 % (40 )27.95 % (130)55.91% (260)16.12 % (75)Fig.4. Method of Assesment35Fig. 3. Lectures to be done302525.80%40.86%LCD projectorsBlack board20151052.16%Over headprojectorNo medium tobe used0MultiplechoiceShortanswerLonganswerQuestionwithreasoningskillClinicalcase study31.18%127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!