THE NATURE OF GOD AND CHRISTDoctrinal Study Paper<strong>The</strong>se are some <strong>of</strong> the scriptures most <strong>of</strong>ten used to deny the preexistence <strong>and</strong> divinity <strong>of</strong>Jesus <strong>Christ</strong>. Unitarians place themselves in a logical contradiction, on the one h<strong>and</strong> they denythe preexistence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christ</strong> in eternity, but on the other h<strong>and</strong> they try to make Jesus into <strong>God</strong> afterHis human conception <strong>and</strong> birth. Thus they try to have it both ways. If the resurrected Jesus<strong>Christ</strong> exists on the <strong>God</strong> plane, then there are two beings in the <strong>God</strong>head. Jesus states that Heexists as the I AM <strong>and</strong> that He is seated at the right h<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>: “Jesus said, ‘I am. And you willsee the Son <strong>of</strong> Man sitting at the right h<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Power, <strong>and</strong> coming with the clouds <strong>of</strong> heaven”(Mark 14:62). “Hereafter the Son <strong>of</strong> Man will sit on the right h<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the power <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>” (Luke22:69). “But he, being full <strong>of</strong> the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven <strong>and</strong> saw the glory <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, <strong>and</strong>Jesus st<strong>and</strong>ing at the right h<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>” (Acts 7:55).To properly divide the word <strong>of</strong> truth <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> the Scriptures, we must weigh all theevidence—line upon line <strong>and</strong> precept upon precept. And when this is done, we reach theirrefutable conclusion that Jesus is <strong>God</strong> <strong>and</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>God</strong>head. He preexisted His humanbirth with the glory He shared with the Father before the world began, which was restored afterHis resurrection. He is our Savior <strong>and</strong> soon coming King. We were purchased with His blood,the blood <strong>of</strong> the Messiah—<strong>God</strong> in the flesh!Page 66September 2005© 2005 <strong>United</strong> <strong>Church</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, an International Association
THE NATURE OF GOD AND CHRISTDoctrinal Study PaperAppendix GGenesis 19:24 <strong>and</strong> PluralityIn Genesis 19:24 YHWH number one rained brimstone <strong>and</strong> fire from a second YHWH out<strong>of</strong> heaven. <strong>The</strong> first YHWH is on earth; He is the one who had been speaking previously toAbraham. YHWH had appeared to him at the oaks <strong>of</strong> Mamre <strong>and</strong> had warned him about thecoming destruction <strong>of</strong> Sodom. That YHWH who was on earth, YHWH number one, was nowraining fire <strong>and</strong> brimstone from another YHWH who is in heaven. Thus the term YHWH is usedhere <strong>of</strong> two different beings.Although some scholars see this as a simple effort to show emphasis—repeating YHWHto emphasize that this is judgment from <strong>God</strong>—not all commentators see it this way. AdamClarke states:<strong>The</strong> Lord rained brimstone <strong>and</strong> fire from the Lord. As all judgment is committed to theSon <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, many <strong>of</strong> the primitive fathers <strong>and</strong> several modern divines have supposed thatthe words … (vaihovah) <strong>and</strong> … (meeth Yehovah) imply, Jehovah the Son rainingbrimstone <strong>and</strong> fire from Jehovah the Father; <strong>and</strong> that this place affords no mean pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>the proper Divinity <strong>of</strong> our blessed Redeemer. 69Adam Clarke goes on to state that he doesn’t consider this as definitive pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> thedivinity <strong>and</strong> preexistence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christ</strong>, but he states it as a curiosity that such a reference wouldappear in the context <strong>of</strong> a discussion between Abraham <strong>and</strong> YHWH.It may be so; but though the point is sufficiently established elsewhere, it does not appearto me to be plainly indicated here. And it is always better on a subject <strong>of</strong> this kind not tohave recourse to pro<strong>of</strong>s, which require pro<strong>of</strong>s to confirm them. It must however begranted that two persons mentioned as Jehovah in one verse, is both a strange <strong>and</strong> curiouscircumstance; <strong>and</strong> it will appear more remarkable when we consider that the personcalled Jehovah, who conversed with Abraham, (see chap. xviii.,) <strong>and</strong> sent those twoangels to bring Lot <strong>and</strong> his family out <strong>of</strong> this devoted place, <strong>and</strong> seems himself after heleft <strong>of</strong>f talking with Abraham to have ascended to heaven, Genesis 19:33, does not anymore appear on this occasion till we hear that JEHOVAH rained upon Sodom <strong>and</strong>Gomorrah brimstone <strong>and</strong> fire from JEHOVAH out <strong>of</strong> heaven. This certainly gives muchcountenance to the opinion referred to above, though still it may fall short <strong>of</strong> positivepro<strong>of</strong>. 70Matthew Henry adds a similar statement about this incident:Concerning this destruction observe, 1. <strong>God</strong> was the immediate author <strong>of</strong> it. It wasdestruction from the Almighty: <strong>The</strong> Lord rained—from the Lord (v. 24), that is, <strong>God</strong> fromhimself, by his own immediate power, <strong>and</strong> not in the common course <strong>of</strong> nature. Or, <strong>God</strong>69 Adam Clarke, Adam Clarke’s Commentary on the Bible, Crosswalk.com, 1995-2004.70 Ibid.Page 67September 2005© 2005 <strong>United</strong> <strong>Church</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, an International Association