13.07.2015 Views

FINAL REPORT - psflibrary.org

FINAL REPORT - psflibrary.org

FINAL REPORT - psflibrary.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3. Evaluation on the Trainer’s teaching performanceEvaluation on the trainers’ performance was based on several criteria including:a. Mastering on the training substanciesb. Systematics of teachingc. Teaching Performanced. Relevance of material with training objectivee. Training facilityf. Forum discussiong. Motivating participantsh. Quality of training materialThe result of evaluation on each trainer by all participants is shown in Table 7 All trainers wereassessed with good and very good criteria.Table 7 Evaluation result on teaching performanceNo Evaluation Criteria1. Mastering on the trainingsubstancies2. Systematics of teaching3. Teaching Performance4. Relevance of material withtraining objective5. Training facility6 Forum discussion7 Motivating participantsSahat (wind)Score Criteria Score82.779.580.678.678.080.077.5VerygoodGoodVerygoodGoodGoodVerygoodGoodAndrias(biomass)83.083.786.080.084.384.685.9Taufik (solar) Taufik (mhydro)Criteria Score CriteriaVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygood84.483.083.883.180.083.682.98 Quality of training materialVery81.186.083.6goodNote: 0 - 60 = poor; 61 -70 = fair; 71 - 80 = good; 81 - 100 = very goodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodScore Criteria79.283.080.082.982.982.482.884.1GoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodRislima (Introto RE)Score Criteria81.479.479.981.480.080.879.082.2VerygoodGoodGoodVerygoodVerygoodVerygoodGoodVerygood21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!