03.12.2012 Views

ANNUAL REPORT 2007 | 2008 - Gimv

ANNUAL REPORT 2007 | 2008 - Gimv

ANNUAL REPORT 2007 | 2008 - Gimv

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VALUATION<br />

AT GIMV<br />

Methods used and link with the development<br />

of fi nancial markets<br />

<strong>Gimv</strong> values its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis. This is done on the basis of the International Private<br />

Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines (IPEV). These valuation rules have been subscribed by around<br />

35 international organizations and are used worldwide in the private equity sector. These recommendations<br />

allow the general and theoretical IFRS accounting rules to be adapted to the specifi c worlds of private equity<br />

and venture capital.<br />

These accounting rules start from the principle that the portfolio<br />

value should represent the fair value. This is the value at which<br />

the investment could be sold, at the particular point in time, in<br />

a voluntary sale. Forced sale or liquidation prices cannot be<br />

used as a basis for valuation. This means that the portfolio valuation<br />

can vary from one quarter to the next in line with market<br />

circumstances.<br />

Determining the fair value of a listed company in the portfolio<br />

is in principle a simple matter. This value is the listed price of<br />

the enterprise at the reporting date, multiplied by the number of<br />

shares owned by <strong>Gimv</strong>. This stock market value has to be used<br />

for valuation purposes, even if <strong>Gimv</strong> would be unwilling to sell at<br />

that price. In the past fi nancial year, 17 percent of the portfolio<br />

consisted of listed companies. In this way fl uctuations in the<br />

stock market and in the price on reporting date immediately<br />

impact the valuation of the <strong>Gimv</strong> portfolio.<br />

The majority of the portfolio consists of unlisted shareholdings.<br />

As these enterprises lack listed prices, an alternative valuation<br />

method is called for. It is here that the IPEV guidelines are of<br />

great importance. For investments less than one year old, the<br />

original investment cost is retained as the most relevant valuation,<br />

except if clear indications exist of revaluation during this<br />

fi rst year. At the end of March <strong>2007</strong>, 7 percent of the <strong>Gimv</strong><br />

portfolio was valued at original investment cost.<br />

18 | <strong>Gimv</strong> Annual Report <strong>2007</strong>-<strong>2008</strong> | Operating and fi nancial report<br />

In the case of buy-outs and growth capital investments, <strong>Gimv</strong><br />

generally looks for a group of comparable listed companies as<br />

a reference. An average of the valuation multiples of this group<br />

is then used to estimate the value of the unlisted shareholding.<br />

In many cases this valuation is further corrected with a discount<br />

to refl ect the more limited liquidity of unlisted shareholdings.<br />

In this way a market-related valuation is obtained, and a link<br />

created between value development on capital markets and<br />

the valuation of the unlisted shareholdings. This explains why<br />

unlisted shareholdings, even if they are doing well, can be the<br />

subject of negative valuation corrections on falling markets. At<br />

the end of March <strong>2008</strong>, <strong>Gimv</strong> valued 31 percent of its portfolio<br />

in this way. Given that this valuation is totally independent of the<br />

original investment costs and fl uctuates with capital markets, it<br />

is possible that, on sale, a capital loss is obtained against the<br />

most recent carrying value, and at the same time an attractive<br />

capital gain in comparison with the original investment costs.<br />

Many companies that are fi nanced with venture capital are still<br />

at the starting phase and develop unique products. For this<br />

reason it is impossible in most cases to put together a reference<br />

group of listed companies. The most objective way of valuing<br />

such technology starters is therefore to use the value of the<br />

latest fi nancing round for the shareholding in question. At <strong>Gimv</strong>,<br />

17 percent of the portfolio is valued in this way.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!