Reading Socio-Spatial Interplay - Arkitektur- og designhÃ¸gskolen i ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

R E A D I N G S O C I O - S P A T I A L I N T E R P L A Y P A R T 2types in relation to how they are intended to work as socio-spatial tool kits isneeded:I. As identifiable sets of architectural characteristics related to how thebasic architectural lay out is accommodated for different ranges ofactivities and encounter situations (in terms of spatial organization,functional and social integration, and ways of mediating more or lesspublic and private spaces),II. As recognizable sets of architectural elements, iconographicalcharacteristics and issues of monumentality that can be associated withhistorical patterns in socio-spatial practices, power-relations etc., andIII. As typical architectural characteristics that reflect time-specific ideasabout qualities and characteristics of urban life.Point I implies identification of pure architectural characteristics such asspatial configuration and spatial organization of an architectural system. Ashistory shows, the same architectural principles – as for instance lamellaeblocks and Garden cities or suburbs – have been applied at different places atdifferent times: Seen as pure organizational principles their functional sociospatialcharacteristics can be expected to perform more or less in the sameway, independent of time and place. The architectural systems are thoughalso historical constructions that can be related to certain historical periods.Point II+III implies identification of architectural characteristics that arespecifically related to time of origin and development (for instance typical19 th century apartment buildings in traditional urban blocks with renaissancedetailing, typical early 20 th century Garden suburbs with English-inspiredbrick buildings, etc.).By morphological analysis of architectural systems, we have now seen howeach distinguishable set of architectural elements are internally related interms of spatial logics. Identification of architectural systems impliescategorization of socio-spatial tool kits, but the architectural systems are notthough absolute socio-spatial categories: social components may change overtime, and socio-spatial practices can be modified, sometimes even completelyreplaced, transforming the function, role, and image of an area.As much as being related to recognizable architectural characteristics(architectural systems), the architectural situation of a study area is related tothe dynamic relations between different systems (within the urbanlandscape), and also to relations between the architectural system of theactual area and the urban landscape as a whole:By focusing on how the architectural systems successively has developedover time we have seen how each new architectural system is developed onthe background from experiences with the performance of previously existing188
R E A D I N G S O C I O - S P A T I A L I N T E R P L A Y P A R T 2architectural systems: For instance, the architectural system of the traditionalurban blocks, exemplified by Grünerløkka, has certain architecturalcharacteristics. When laid out, this architectural system representedsomething new and different in contrast to the existing urban structure inOslo at that time. Today (much later) the architectural characteristics of thisparticular architectural system represents sets of differences from thearchitectural systems that have been developed in the meantime (as responsesand reactions to what was conceived as problems related to precisely thisparticular architectural system).Differences in the study areas’ location in the historically developed urbanstructure, and differences in how areas are designed to serve a specificfunction and role in the urban structure, are related to the areas’developmental history. The three areas have developed in different historicalperiods in which provisions were made for different forms of transport anddifferent degrees of mobility. The surroundings are thus at the outsetdesigned to serve specific roles and functions in relation to the rest of theurban structure – at different phases of the developmental history of thewhole urban landscape. By focusing on how the architectural systems arerelated to major structural elements of the urban landscape, we have nowidentified relational aspects of the architectural situation that would haveescaped an analysis that only dealt with categorization of architecturalsystems by their architectural characteristics as such.189
Page 1 and 2:
CON • TEXTHilde HaslumReading Soc
Page 3:
CON • TEXTTil Mikkel, Nora og Hau
Page 6 and 7:
R E A D I N G S O C I O - S P A T I
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148: R E A D I N G S O C I O - S P A T I
Page 197: R E A D I N G S O C I O - S P A T I
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375:
show all

Reading Socio-Spatial Interplay - Arkitektur- og designhÃ¸gskolen i ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?