13.07.2015 Views

validation and case studies

validation and case studies

validation and case studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FITNET FFS – MK7– Section 13Primary Loading: Each test consisted of a monotonic, slow increase in the applied bending force which wasuniformly distributed by a roller arrangement; Figure 13.21 The fracture loads were as follows:Specimen LLAWSpecimen LLHTSpecimen HLAW (high L r regime, as-welded)Specimen HLHT (high L r regime, PWHT)- 1.27 MN- 2.19 MN- 5.10 MN- 4.83 MNSecondary Loading: Through-wall self-balancing residual stress field produced by welding; tensile region atedges of plate, compressive region in centre of plate; Figure 13.21. The through-thickness distribution ofresidual stresses was evaluated by a block removal <strong>and</strong> splitting technique incorporating strain gaugemeasurements. The measured through-thickness residual stress distributions for the direction transverse tothe weld are shown in Figure 13.22 for the specimens LLAW <strong>and</strong> LLHT. The distribution is self-balancing withtension on the outside <strong>and</strong> compression in the mid-thickness region. The residual stress for the PWHT plate isreduced from the as-welded plate by at least an order of magnitude. The measured through-thicknessresidual stress distributions for specimens HLAW <strong>and</strong> HLHT were comparable with those for LLAW <strong>and</strong>LLHT, respectively. A comparison of the measured distributions for the two as-welded specimens is shownin Figure 13.23. The comparison gives confidence that the two pairs of large scale fracture test specimenswere in very similar residual stress states when tested.Temperature: The fracture tests were carried out in a 6.3 MN rig with the plate temperature stabilised at -120°Cfor specimens LLAW <strong>and</strong> LLHT <strong>and</strong> -30°C for HLAW <strong>and</strong> HLHT. The temperature of the test plates wasmonitored by six thermocouples.Materials Tensile Data: Young's modulus was taken as 210 GPa <strong>and</strong> Poisson’s ratio as 0.3. Yield <strong>and</strong>ultimate stress data are tabulated below.MaterialRelevantTestTemperature[ºC]IndividualYield StressValues [MPa]AverageYieldStress[MPa]IndividualUltimateStress Values[MPa]AverageUltimateStress[MPa]As weldedparentAs weldedweldPWHTparentPWHT weldLLAW -120 621, 615 618 798, 783 791HLAW -30 - 520 - 677LLAW -120 567, 534 551 767, 757 762HLAW -30 450, 412 431 638, 586 612LLHT -120 613, 579 596 776, 768 772HLHT -30 - 520 - 677LLHT -120 546, 576 561 686, 702 694HLPW -30 437, 413 425 575, 546 561Fracture Toughness Data: Fracture toughness properties for the weld material in both the as-welded <strong>and</strong>stress relieved conditions were obtained from single edge notch bend (SENB) specimens of 67 mm thickness(B), 67 mm width (W) <strong>and</strong> an a 0 /W ratio of 0.5 where a 0 is initial crack length. All the specimens failed bycleavage fracture. The measured K mat values were:13-26 © FITNET 2006 – All rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!