WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTImported Surface Water<strong>City</strong> imported water supplies will be contracted through CMWD under the restructuredrate program. CMWD recently restructured its rate system to generally be consistent withthe approach used by Metropolitan in allocating water among its member agencies. Ingeneral, CMWD has developed a 10-year purchase order for each <strong>of</strong> its member agencies,including the <strong>City</strong>. As part <strong>of</strong> its purchase order, the <strong>City</strong> is provided an allocation <strong>of</strong>90 percent <strong>of</strong> its maximum demand from fiscal years 1989/90 to 2001/02. This allocation istermed Tier 1 water and is priced at a lower rate than water purchases that exceed thisallocation termed Tier 2 water. The Tier 1 allocation increases as a function <strong>of</strong> the 10-yearrolling averages <strong>of</strong> total purchases exclusive <strong>of</strong> agricultural water purchases. Over thecourse <strong>of</strong> the purchase order, each signator agrees to purchase 60 percent <strong>of</strong> its maximumdemand from fiscal years 1989/90 to 2001/02. If the purchase order minimum is notreached, then the signator would pay CMWD the difference in volume times the averagewater rate over the life <strong>of</strong> the contract. Tier 2 water prices significantly exceed the Tier 1water price. However, if CMWD is able to manage its water resources to the point that itdoes not have to purchase Tier 2 water from Metropolitan, then it will reimburse each <strong>of</strong> itsmember agencies in a relative proportion among those agencies that exceeded their Tier 1allocation. Any <strong>City</strong> purchases that exceed the Tier 1 historical 10-year rolling average willbe purchased at the Tier 2 premium amount. In addition, imported supply may not beavailable in all years; for example, due to State Water Project supply limitations in droughtyears and other emergency situations.3.2.2 Port Hueneme Water AgencyAs described above, PHWA has two primary sources <strong>of</strong> water for its supply, desaltedgroundwater and imported surface water from CMWD. The PHWA primary source <strong>of</strong>supply is groundwater from UWCD via the O-H pipeline that is desalted at the BWRDF tobe compatible with the quality <strong>of</strong> the imported surface water from CMWD that is deliveredvia the Industrial Lateral. This source is used to supplement flows produced at the BWRDF.The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Port Hueneme, the Naval Construction Battalion Center Port Hueneme, and theNaval Air Weapons Station Point Mugu all have individual wells; but these are primarilystandby facilities. PHWA has been able to maximize its use <strong>of</strong> the local groundwater byoperating the BWRDF around the clock at a steady flow rate and storing excess water in thePt. Mugu reservoir.Over time, PHWA has been able to accumulate a sizeable unused groundwater allocation.The projected water demands and available supplies through 2020 are summarized below.As these data indicate, PHWA will continue to accumulate unused groundwater allocationfar into the future.W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 41
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTProjected Demands and Supplies for PHWAParameter 2000 2005 2010 2020PHWA Supplies, AFYUWCD Allocation a 4,342 4,011 3,880 3,880PHWA Allocation b 1,637 1,529 1,313 1,313BWRDF losses c (950) (950) (950) (950)CMWD Tier 1 Allocation d 2,641 2,641 2,641 2,641Total PHWA Supplies 7,670 7,231 6,884 6,884PHWA Demands, AFY e 6,071 6,277 6,483 6,894Supply Excess (Deficit), AFY f 1,599 954 401 (10)Notes:a Includes baseline transfers <strong>of</strong> 421 AFY.b Includes MWD transfers <strong>of</strong> 700 AFY.c Brine losses estimated at 19 percent <strong>of</strong> BWRDF usage (estimated at 4,900 AFY).d CMWD Tier 1 estimates based on the CMWD Purveyor Meeting handouts May 22, 2002.e Presented PHWA demands are interpolated between actual data for year 2000 and UWCD projections for year 2020.f Does not assume use <strong>of</strong> any accumulated groundwater conservation credits3.2.3 Permeate DemandSeveral users currently provided potable water service by the <strong>City</strong> independently provideadvanced water treatment to make it acceptable for their specific use (e.g., producehigh-quality water for their manufacturing/processing purposes). Such treatment caninclude RO treatment or ion exchange. Concentrates from this treatment are discharged tothe <strong>City</strong> sanitary sewer. Some examples <strong>of</strong> these facilities include Procter & Gamble(manufacturing), Agrilink (food processing), and Pacific Linen <strong>Services</strong> (laundry service).Fiscal Year 1999/2000 water demands for these industrial dischargers are summarizedbelow.Potential Desalted Water DemandsWater DemandConcentrate ProductionFacility hcf AFY gpd AFYAgrilink Foods 62,988 145 180,000 144Arcturus Manufacturing 12,354 28 25,000 20Kaiser Aluminum 4,674 11 10,000 8Mission Linen Supply 15,484 36 39,000 31Pacific Linen Service 42,333 97 80,000 64Procter and Gamble 1,014,976 2,330 1,200,000 1,340Sithe Energies a 80,214 – 160, 428 184 - 368 70,000 56Willamette Industries 267,229 613 235,000 187Subtotal 1,500,252 -1,580,466 3,444 – 3,628 1,839,000 1,850Note:a According to Sithe Energies personnel (Dave Hermanson, personal communication), Sithe Energies currently has anarrangement with Boskovich Farms for its raw water supply. Exact demand data were not available, but it wasestimated that between and 5 and 10 million gallons <strong>of</strong> water were used per month. Sithe Energies uses a two-stageRO system to produce its water. RO concentrate is used by Boskovich Farms in the first stage <strong>of</strong> their two-stageproduce washing process. The concentrate is then discharged to the <strong>City</strong> sanitary sewer system via Boskovich’s sewerconnection. Boskovich Farms was not identified as a discharger <strong>of</strong> industrial concentrate (<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oxnard</strong>, 2002).W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 42
- Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTS6.2.2 Base Case and Phase 1
- Page 6 and 7:
CONTENTSFiguresSection 1.0 - Introd
- Page 8 and 9:
AcronymsACPAFYASRAWTFBasin PlanbgsB
- Page 10:
1.0 IntroductionThis Technical Repo
- Page 13 and 14:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 15 and 16:
SANTA BARBARACOUNTYSanta BarbaraVEN
- Page 17 and 18:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT2.2
- Page 19 and 20:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTmul
- Page 21 and 22:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT2.4
- Page 23 and 24:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTof
- Page 25 and 26: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTFor
- Page 27 and 28: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 29 and 30: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 31 and 32: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTres
- Page 33 and 34: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTPum
- Page 35 and 36: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTdis
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 2-1Groundwater Basins and th
- Page 39 and 40: Figure 2-3Groundwater Basins andUWC
- Page 41 and 42: 604020Precipitation (inches)0-20189
- Page 43 and 44: Note: Generalized surficial geology
- Page 45 and 46: (a) Groundwater Elevation Monitorin
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 2-11DWR 1976Schematic CrossS
- Page 49 and 50: 02N22W12R01S02N22W22M04SVineyard Av
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2-15USGS Groundwater LevelHy
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 2-17USGS Groundwater LevelHy
- Page 55 and 56: (a) Groundwater Elevations, LAS, Sp
- Page 57 and 58: (a) Total Dissolved Solids, UAS, 20
- Page 59 and 60: (a) Chloride Concentrations, Oxnard
- Page 61 and 62: Figure 2-25Subsidence onthe Oxnard
- Page 63 and 64: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTAgr
- Page 65 and 66: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTto
- Page 67 and 68: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTOxn
- Page 69 and 70: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTGro
- Page 71 and 72: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORThis
- Page 73 and 74: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTsou
- Page 75: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTPro
- Page 79 and 80: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTove
- Page 81 and 82: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTout
- Page 83 and 84: TABLE 3-2City Blended Water Quality
- Page 85 and 86: TABLE 3-4Agricultural Water Supply
- Page 87 and 88: Figure 3-1NNo ScaleOxnard Plain Wat
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 3-3Santa Clara RiverFlow and
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 3-5Agriculture andPumping al
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 3-7Agriculture and Pumpingal
- Page 95 and 96: 50,00045,00040,00035,000Supply and
- Page 97 and 98: Acre-Feet6,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001
- Page 99 and 100: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT4.1
- Page 101 and 102: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTSea
- Page 103 and 104: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTfro
- Page 105 and 106: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTcar
- Page 107 and 108: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTirr
- Page 109: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORThyd
- Page 112 and 113: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 114 and 115: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTRec
- Page 116 and 117: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTdes
- Page 118 and 119: Hwy 101 - Ventura FwyCamarilloVentu
- Page 120 and 121: 101 FreewayVentura RoadCaminoDel So
- Page 122 and 123: WELL#21WELL#22WELL#20WELL #23BLENDI
- Page 124 and 125: 5.0 Historical Groundwater Flow Mod
- Page 126 and 127:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTcli
- Page 128 and 129:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 130 and 131:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT−
- Page 132 and 133:
SANTA BARBARACOUNTYSanta BarbaraVEN
- Page 134 and 135:
6.0 GREAT Program Groundwater FlowM
- Page 136 and 137:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTgro
- Page 138 and 139:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTto
- Page 140 and 141:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTGro
- Page 142 and 143:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT6.1
- Page 144 and 145:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTfor
- Page 146 and 147:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTin
- Page 148 and 149:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 150 and 151:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT−
- Page 152 and 153:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTtwo
- Page 154 and 155:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 156 and 157:
TABLE 6-1Scenarios for Model Simula
- Page 158 and 159:
100Cumulative Departure from Mean20
- Page 160 and 161:
15060Elevation (feet, msl)00Rainfal
- Page 162 and 163:
5833aPci f ic5O c55185e a n51513552
- Page 164 and 165:
-100406080700-40-20406050-103001402
- Page 166 and 167:
400-402030-50010-30-10-60-20-30-107
- Page 168 and 169:
-20400-40103020-500-10-30-20-401200
- Page 170 and 171:
0-10-204030-40-50-30-1001020-20-40-
- Page 172 and 173:
0-204030-40-6001020-30-10-20-30-50-
- Page 174 and 175:
North Oxnard Plain Area6 7 8 901N22
- Page 176 and 177:
10040608070504010901001201401701601
- Page 178 and 179:
14050809030506070104001030100120901
- Page 180 and 181:
10080507060401001201401701802001501
- Page 182 and 183:
01005070601601201108070906050210180
- Page 184 and 185:
70140509070601040501020901101401701
- Page 186 and 187:
Oxnard Forebay Area1 2 3 402N22W 12
- Page 188 and 189:
South Oxnard Plain Area11 12 13 140
- Page 190 and 191:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTtho
- Page 192 and 193:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT7.2
- Page 194 and 195:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTRed
- Page 196 and 197:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 198:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTKen