<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>2015</strong>intended to better integrate state planning functionsacross agency lines <strong>and</strong> to increase the value <strong>of</strong> theState <strong>Plan</strong> as an advisory tool for municipalities <strong>and</strong>regional planning organizations like SWRPA. Inaddition, Public Act 05-205, which adopted the State<strong>Plan</strong>, also added the requirement that Connecticut’s15 regional planning organizations update their plansevery 10 years.The Blue Ribbon Commission Report on PropertyTaxes <strong>and</strong> Smart Growth was released in 2003. TheBlue Ribbon Commission recommended that the stateincrease its funding to local governments to reducetheir reliance on property taxes to fund public services,notably education. It also recommended strengtheningregional planning <strong>and</strong> more effective growthmanagement tools.The State Transportation Strategy, approved bythe Connecticut Transportation Strategy Board in2002, was also considered during the preparation <strong>of</strong>this <strong>Plan</strong>.The Greater Bridgeport <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning AgencyThe Greater Bridgeport <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Agency(GBRPA) was in the process <strong>of</strong> preparing its <strong>Regional</strong><strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>2006</strong> in December2005; GBRPA’s last regional plan was adopted by thatagency in 1990. Central to the <strong>2006</strong> plan is thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> a regional growth management strategyto ensure that when l<strong>and</strong>-use decisions are made they“have the effect <strong>of</strong> retaining the characteristics whichmake the [Greater Bridgeport] Region a good place tolive in terms <strong>of</strong> economic opportunity, social conditions<strong>and</strong> environmental quality.” The preamble to the draft<strong>2006</strong> plan also defines urban, suburban <strong>and</strong> rural“service areas,” as well as “special areas forconsideration,” such as those with important cultural,historic <strong>and</strong> environmental features.Connecticut MetroPatternsIn 2003, the Office <strong>of</strong> Urban Affairs <strong>of</strong> theArchdiocese <strong>of</strong> Hartford released ConnecticutMetroPatterns. This report – which focuses on howConnecticut’s strong reliance on property taxes t<strong>of</strong>und municipal services results in competition betweenmunicipalities to grow their gr<strong>and</strong> lists – compares thestate’s 169 municipalities based on many differentsocioeconomic factors.Westchester CountyThe County’s l<strong>and</strong>-use plan, Patterns forWestchester, was adopted in 1995. While covering anarea much larger than the South Western Region,Patterns nonetheless shares this Region’s emphasison centrality to preserve Westchester’s character.Centrality, the <strong>Plan</strong>’s Guiding PrincipleThe principle <strong>of</strong> “centrality” – which guided the1995 <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Development</strong>(“the 1995 <strong>Plan</strong>”) – involves focusing development inthose parts <strong>of</strong> the Region with the infrastructure inplace to best accommodate growth. By doing this, theRegion’s urban areas are strengthened, making themexciting, vibrant places to live <strong>and</strong> work. Centrality alsopreserves the Region’s dwindling supply <strong>of</strong> openspace by encouraging developers (<strong>of</strong>tentimes throughincentives) to forego building on “green spaces” <strong>and</strong>concentrate instead on the Region’s town centers. Asstated so succinctly in the 1995 <strong>Plan</strong>, “centrality is theplanning alternative to sprawl.”Another benefit <strong>of</strong> centralizing new development inthe urbanized portions <strong>of</strong> the Region is that it providesthe critical mass needed to make public transportationmore viable for a greater number <strong>of</strong> people, includingThe Housatonic Valley Council <strong>of</strong> Elected OfficialsThe Housatonic Valley Council <strong>of</strong> Elected Officials(HVCEO) adopted its regional Growth Guide Map in 1997 <strong>and</strong>was updating it in the summer <strong>of</strong> 2005. According to thenarrative that accompanies the Growth Guide Map, its“fundamental purpose . . . is to reduce the negative effects <strong>of</strong>unchecked scattering <strong>of</strong> economic <strong>and</strong> housing developmentacross the l<strong>and</strong>scape” <strong>and</strong> to “conserve existing urban <strong>and</strong>intown [sic] areas <strong>and</strong> promote staged growth around them.”To this end, the Growth Guide Map established six categories<strong>of</strong> development in the Region, with the “regional center”(Danbury) prioritized for the most intensive development <strong>and</strong>“semi-rural remote areas” <strong>and</strong> “small community centers”targeted primarily for conservation.Old Greenwich5
South Western <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Agencyresidents <strong>of</strong> those areas <strong>and</strong> the people who workthere. Given the fact that the Region must rely on anovertaxed <strong>and</strong>, in some cases, deterioratingtransportation system, this is arguably the greatestpotential benefit <strong>of</strong> centrality.It is important to recognize that implementingcentrality is reliant on the Region’s municipalities,which establish or modify l<strong>and</strong>-use regulations withintheir boundaries. These can include zoning citycenters for the highest-density uses, encouraging<strong>of</strong>fice <strong>and</strong> residential uses around transit stations <strong>and</strong>discouraging the extension <strong>of</strong> sewer lines into lowdensityareas to reduce their development potential.Basic Goals <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong>In adopting the <strong>Plan</strong>, SWRPA seeks to achieve thefollowing goals for the Region, which appear below(the order in which they have been placed is r<strong>and</strong>om<strong>and</strong> should not be inferred as being in priority order):❑ Encourage municipal l<strong>and</strong>-use planning thatrecognizes the need to direct development tothose areas with the infrastructure, includingtransportation, to best accommodate it.❑ Preserve the Region’s dwindling supply <strong>of</strong>permanent open space <strong>and</strong>, whenever possible,add to it through either outright acquisition <strong>of</strong>open space or through conservation easements.❑ Improve <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong> the Region’s publictransportation system, including the New HavenLine Railroad, bus transit services <strong>and</strong> facilitiesthat support transit use.❑ Provide for the Region’s growing energy needswhile protecting human health, natural resources<strong>and</strong> property values.❑ Encourage the development <strong>of</strong> a broad range <strong>of</strong>housing alternatives, <strong>and</strong> whenever possible,direct new housing to locations that are servedby transit.❑ Encourage the preservation <strong>and</strong> adaptive reuse<strong>of</strong> historic structures.❑ Foster continued cooperation among theRegion’s first responders to develop coordinatedplans to address emergencies that cannot becontained within a single municipality’sboundaries.❑ <strong>Plan</strong> for an aging <strong>and</strong> increasingly diversepopulation.❑ Protect the quality <strong>of</strong> life in all <strong>of</strong> the Region’sneighborhoods by ensuring that low-incomeareas or other communities <strong>of</strong> concern are nottargeted for the location <strong>of</strong> undesirable l<strong>and</strong>uses.❑ Maintain the Region’s strong business climate bybuilding on those assets that stimulated theRegion’s business growth in the first place:viable transportation facilities, attractivecommunities, good schools <strong>and</strong> a well-educated<strong>and</strong> trained workforce.New Canaan Town Hall6