13.07.2015 Views

The Standards for Evaluation of Names and Armory - SCA Heraldry

The Standards for Evaluation of Names and Armory - SCA Heraldry

The Standards for Evaluation of Names and Armory - SCA Heraldry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>St<strong>and</strong>ards</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Names</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Armory</strong>:<strong>The</strong> Rules <strong>for</strong> SubmissionsName phrases documented in this way are categorized as given names <strong>and</strong> bynames based on type(surnames are a type <strong>of</strong> byname). <strong>The</strong>y may be used in any way that a given name or byname <strong>of</strong> thattype may be used. Modern "middle names" are a special case. Some people in the modern world havemiddle names derived from given names. Others have middle names derived from surnames, throughshifts in naming practice, through marriage, or <strong>for</strong> other reasons. <strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, middle names areregisterable based on the type <strong>of</strong> name they are: given names or surnames. Middle names whichoriginated as surnames but are modernly used as given names may be used as given names.For example, someone whose legal middle name is Elizabeth may use it as a given name, becauseElizabeth is a given name by type. However, someone whose legal middle name is MacGregor may notuse it as a given name, because it is a surname by type. <strong>The</strong> name Madison, while it originated as asurname, is modernly used as a given name. <strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, someone whose legal middle name is Madisonmay also use it as a given name through the legal name allowance.This rule can allow a name phrase which is not attested in period, but the name as a whole must stillmeet the other requirements <strong>for</strong> names. This includes issues with overall construction, conflict,presumption, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fense.For example, Earl is a modern given name, but it is also a title <strong>of</strong> rank within the <strong>SCA</strong>. <strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, wewould not register it, even if documented as the submitter's legal given name.f. Branch Name Allowance: Name phrases may be created from the registered <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> <strong>SCA</strong> branches.Only the exact registered <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> the branch name may be used, <strong>and</strong> they are registered in the linguaAnglica <strong>for</strong>m, '<strong>of</strong> Branchname'. Translated <strong>for</strong>ms will not be registered under this allowance, even if itmatches the intended origin <strong>of</strong> the submission or <strong>of</strong> the branch.For example, this would allow the bynames <strong>of</strong> the East or <strong>of</strong> Fontaine dans Sable, as these are theexpected lingua Anglica <strong>for</strong>ms. However, this would not allow von Osten as a German translation <strong>of</strong>"<strong>of</strong> the East", even if the given name was German. It would also not allow de la Fontaine dans Sable asa fully French version <strong>of</strong> "<strong>of</strong> Fontaine dans Sable" under this rule as it is not the lingua Anglica <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong>the branch name, even though the branch name is French. If Fontaine dans Sable can also documentedas an attested or constructed French name, de Fontaine dans Sable could be used in <strong>for</strong>ming a fullyFrench name; however that would not be through the use <strong>of</strong> the branch name allowance.g. <strong>The</strong> Gr<strong>and</strong>father Clause: In a new personal name submission, an individual may use name phrasesalready registered to them, even if that name phrase would no longer be allowed under the current rules.Only the exact, actual name phrase from the registered <strong>for</strong>m may be used, not variants, patterns, etc.<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> the gr<strong>and</strong>father clause does not allow the submitter to evade new style problems (asdiscussed in PN.2 below). It only allows the submitter to keep style problems that already exist withthe registered name.A name phrase from a registered name <strong>of</strong> an individual may also be registered by a close legal relative(such as parent, spouse, child, sibling, etc.). To do this, the submitter must demonstrate the relationshipthrough legal documents or through attestation <strong>of</strong> relationship from the individual whose name isalready registered. Documentation under the gr<strong>and</strong>father clause does not exempt a name or namephrase from conflict, presumption, or <strong>of</strong>fense rules, unless that rules violation is itself gr<strong>and</strong>fathered.<strong>St<strong>and</strong>ards</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Names</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Armory</strong> – April 29, 2012 - Page 11 <strong>of</strong> 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!