13.07.2015 Views

The Standards for Evaluation of Names and Armory - SCA Heraldry

The Standards for Evaluation of Names and Armory - SCA Heraldry

The Standards for Evaluation of Names and Armory - SCA Heraldry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>St<strong>and</strong>ards</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Names</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Armory</strong>:<strong>The</strong> Rules <strong>for</strong> Submissions2. <strong>Names</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Peerage Orders: Order <strong>and</strong> award names may not include the names <strong>of</strong> the peerage ordersor overt references to famous knightly orders such as the Garter. Other types <strong>of</strong> non-personal names mayonly use such elements in contexts where no reference to the order is likely to be perceived by members <strong>of</strong>the order <strong>and</strong> the general populace.For example, while the name Order <strong>of</strong> the Garter <strong>and</strong> Laurel is clear <strong>of</strong> conflict with the Order <strong>of</strong> theLaurel, it is presumptuous <strong>and</strong> we would not register it. Likewise, we would not register Order <strong>of</strong> the Rose<strong>of</strong> the West, even though the addition <strong>of</strong> the element <strong>of</strong> the West clears the conflict with the Order <strong>of</strong> theRose. For example, House <strong>of</strong> the Blue Garter could be seen as a reference to the blue garter badge <strong>of</strong> theOrder <strong>of</strong> the Garter <strong>and</strong> would not be registered, but House <strong>of</strong> the White Garter would be allowed.3. Elements that are Presumptuous in Personal <strong>Names</strong>: <strong>Names</strong> may not contain a name element or group<strong>of</strong> elements we would consider presumptuous in a personal name (see PN.4). Examples include a bynameuniquely used by a single dynasty, the combination <strong>of</strong> a surname <strong>and</strong> the title or seat <strong>of</strong> the family, or namesgranted as an honor.C. <strong>Names</strong> that Claim Powers: Non-personal names may not contain an unmistakable claim <strong>of</strong> superhumanabilities, magical powers, or divine origin.In general, a name phrase used by historical people is not considered to be a claim to superhuman abilities ordivine origin. In general, a non-personal name using an element that would be considered such a claim in apersonal name will not be registered.For example, Odins House would be registerable, because Odin was used as a human given name in MiddleEnglish. Similarly, a name like Gods House would be registerable, as it is the attested name <strong>of</strong> an Englishcollege. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Lokasson House or Lokison House, <strong>for</strong>med from the name Loki, would not beallowed. Because the only known use <strong>of</strong> Loki is as the name <strong>of</strong> an Old Norse god, such a name would be aclaim to a divine origin or relationship.D. Claim <strong>of</strong> Identity, Ownership, or Affiliation with an Important Non-<strong>SCA</strong> Entity or Person: Non-personalnames may not be too close to the name <strong>of</strong> a protected entity. Non-personal names also may not make anunmistakable claim <strong>of</strong> ownership by or affiliation with any name we protect.A non-personal name submission is said to presume on a protected name if the substantive element <strong>of</strong> thesubmission is not substantially different in sound <strong>and</strong> appearance from the substantive element <strong>of</strong> theprotected name, or if it makes an unmistakable claim <strong>of</strong> ownership by or affiliation with the protected name.<strong>The</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>for</strong> substantial difference <strong>and</strong> unmistakable claims are set in NPN.3 above as "identity conflict"<strong>and</strong> "affiliation conflict" respectively, except that such items are not registerable, even with permission.For non-<strong>SCA</strong> entities <strong>and</strong> people considered important enough to protect, we protect all <strong>for</strong>ms in which theirname was known, including in other languages. We do not go out <strong>of</strong> our way to find obscure or hypothetical<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> names that might be too similar to a submission. We protect only the names by which entities wereactually known <strong>and</strong> can easily be found by a modern person.For example, we protect London, Londres, <strong>and</strong> Londinium, as all are <strong>for</strong>ms by which London has beenknown.1. Non-<strong>SCA</strong> Entities Protected from Presumption: A non-personal name submissions is only considered topresume on protected non-personal names. <strong>Names</strong> <strong>of</strong> important non-<strong>SCA</strong> entities are protected frompresumption. Entities that we protect include places (countries, regions, <strong>and</strong> cities), chivalric orders <strong>and</strong>heraldic titles, <strong>and</strong> the names <strong>of</strong> organizations (colleges, businesses, <strong>and</strong> other such entities).Places <strong>and</strong> organizations that are not important enough to have an entry in a st<strong>and</strong>ard print encyclopedia,<strong>St<strong>and</strong>ards</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Names</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Armory</strong> – April 29, 2012 - Page 32 <strong>of</strong> 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!