13.07.2015 Views

The Standards for Evaluation of Names and Armory - SCA Heraldry

The Standards for Evaluation of Names and Armory - SCA Heraldry

The Standards for Evaluation of Names and Armory - SCA Heraldry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>St<strong>and</strong>ards</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Names</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Armory</strong>:<strong>The</strong> Rules <strong>for</strong> SubmissionsFor example, Sable, a cross flory argent mullety gules <strong>and</strong> a chief Or has two DCs from Sable, a cross floryargent <strong>and</strong> a chief Or mullety gules, because the tertiary charge group on the secondary charge has beenremoved <strong>and</strong> a tertiary charge group on the primary charge group added. <strong>The</strong>se tertiary charge groups arenot comparable. However, both <strong>of</strong> those designs have only one DC from Sable, a cross flory argent <strong>and</strong> achief Or, as in each case only one tertiary charge group has been added.3. Change <strong>of</strong> Tincture Within a Charge Group: Distinctly changing the tinctures, direction <strong>of</strong> partitionlines, style <strong>of</strong> partition lines, or number <strong>of</strong> pieces into which a charge group is divided is a distinct change(DC). At most one distinct change may be derived from changes to tincture <strong>of</strong> a single charge group.However, no distinct change <strong>for</strong> tincture may be given under any section <strong>of</strong> this rule when comparing atinctureless badge to another design, as described in A.5.G.1.e above.a. Tinctures: If the tincture <strong>of</strong> at least half the charge group is changed, the charge group will be considereddifferent. <strong>The</strong>re is a distinct change (DC) <strong>for</strong> swapping or rotating the tinctures <strong>of</strong> a charge group evenlydivided into two, three, or four parts. <strong>The</strong>re is not a distinct change <strong>for</strong> reversing the tinctures <strong>of</strong> a chargegroup divided into more than four parts. Furs <strong>and</strong> field treatments are considered different from theirunderlying tincture.For example, Azure, a cross crosslet argent has one DC from Azure, a cross crosslet per pale argent <strong>and</strong>gules. Per fess gules <strong>and</strong> argent, an annulet counterchanged has one DC from Per fess gules <strong>and</strong> argent,an annulet counterchanged argent <strong>and</strong> sable; the first example is a shorth<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> Per fess gules <strong>and</strong>argent, an annulet per fess argent <strong>and</strong> gules. Each <strong>of</strong> the following is a DC from the other two: Vert, atree argent; Vert, a tree ermine; Vert, a tree argent masoned sable.For example, Gules, a fess argent between three lions quarterly argent <strong>and</strong> azure has one DC from Gules,a fess argent between three lions quarterly azure <strong>and</strong> argent, because the tinctures have been swapped.However, Gules, a fess argent between three lions checky argent <strong>and</strong> azure does not have a DC fromGules, a fess argent between three lions checky azure <strong>and</strong> argent, because the lions are divided into morethan four parts.Certain tincture changes are considered part <strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> the charge <strong>and</strong> do not contribute to difference.Charges such as towers <strong>and</strong> castles that are made <strong>of</strong> masonry are not considered to be different whendrawn with or without masoning, though fields <strong>and</strong> charges that are not made <strong>of</strong> masonry are. Somecreatures, such as panthers <strong>and</strong> yales, are <strong>of</strong>ten but not always spotted; the absence or presence <strong>of</strong> thesespots does not contribute to difference, though the addition <strong>of</strong> roundels to another type <strong>of</strong> charge isconsidered to be adding a tertiary charge group.b. Direction <strong>of</strong> Partition Lines: A change <strong>of</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> partition creates a distinct change (DC). <strong>The</strong>major single partition lines include: per bend, per bend sinister, per pale, per fess, per chevron, <strong>and</strong> perchevron inverted. A change from one to another (whether as single lines or multiple <strong>for</strong>ms) is a distinctchange . In addition, a change from any <strong>of</strong> these to per saltire, quarterly, gyronny (<strong>of</strong> any number <strong>of</strong>pieces), per pall, per pall inverted, checky, <strong>and</strong> lozengy or a change between any <strong>of</strong> these is considered adistinct change. A change in direction <strong>of</strong> half the lines <strong>of</strong> a design gives a distinct change. In general, theaddition, removal, or change <strong>of</strong> a partition line or group <strong>of</strong> partition lines that changes organization <strong>of</strong>tinctures in ways that affect half the tincture will be considered a distinct change.For example, the following all have one DC from each other: per bend argent <strong>and</strong> sable, per pale argent<strong>and</strong> sable, <strong>and</strong> lozengy argent <strong>and</strong> sable. <strong>The</strong> change from barry bendy to paly barry is a DC. <strong>The</strong>re is aDC between barry wavy azure <strong>and</strong> argent <strong>and</strong> per pale <strong>and</strong> barry wavy azure <strong>and</strong> argent.<strong>St<strong>and</strong>ards</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Names</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Armory</strong> – April 29, 2012 - Page 62 <strong>of</strong> 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!