13.07.2015 Views

Life of Mozart

Life of Mozart

Life of Mozart

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

386 THE REQUIEM.The second part (Hostias et preces) has a much morecomposed character, as becomes the <strong>of</strong>fering by the spirit <strong>of</strong>its sacrifice to the Almighty. The idea, therefore, <strong>of</strong> stilllingering disquiet is left to be expressed by the syncopatedpassage for the violins, the voices going together almostthroughout the movement, and declaiming the words withstrikingly appropriate expression. The very simplicity <strong>of</strong>this movement reveals the hand <strong>of</strong> the master, and gives itan individuality especially noticeable at the words "tu suscipepro animabus illis, quarum hodie memoriam facimus."Thus far a reference to <strong>Mozart</strong>'s own manuscript suffices todetermine how much was left to Süssmayr's carrying out.Although sufficient indications were given even <strong>of</strong> the moreelaborateand independent instrumental parts to serve as aguide to a well-educated musician, yet the example adducedabove shows how much freedom in matters <strong>of</strong> detail was leftfor the further elaboration; and, not to mention various oversights,it is probable that had <strong>Mozart</strong> completed the compositionmany delicate touches would have been addedto the accompanying parts which cannot now be evenconjectured. Very few indications are given for the windinstruments, and even if <strong>Mozart</strong> gave verbal instructionsconcerning them, much must still remain in doubt. Itmust be allowed, however, that Süssmayr's share in thework has been on the whole successfully performed ; it isquite in keeping with the rest, and he has plainly refrainedfrom making any alterations or surreptitious interpolations.With the last three movements we enter the domain <strong>of</strong>conjecture, if we are to reject the positive testimony <strong>of</strong>Siissmayr, supported by <strong>Mozart</strong>'s widow, as to the share<strong>of</strong> the former in the work. Rochlitz, reviewing Süssmayr'sletter on the subject, remarks that "the works already knownto be by Herr Süssmayr subject his claim to an importantshare in this great composition to considerable doubt ";^^and he expressed his suspicions more decidedly at a latertime.^*' G. Weber, who failed to recognise <strong>Mozart</strong> in manyesA. M. z., IV., p. 4.ßs Cäcilia, IV., p. 289. A. M. Z., XXV., p. 687.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!