06.08.2015 Views

Fighter Combat

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DIVISION TACTICS 2755. In any form of attack it is essential to assail your opponent from behind.6. If your opponent dives on you, do not try to evade his onslaught, but fly tomeet it.7. When over the enemy's lines never forget your own line of retreat.8. Attack on principle in groups of four or six. When the fight breaks up into aseries of single combats, take care that several do not go for one opponent. 1(Note: Captain Oswald Boelcke, who drew up this list, was killed in a midaircollision with his wingman while both were attacking the same aircraft.)Captain Oswald BoelckeGerman Air Service, 191640 VictoriesAs discussed earlier, engaged maneuvering with many fighters in a rigidformation (i.e., the equivalent of division fighting wing doctrine) hasserious limitations and generally has proved effective only against unescorted,poorly maneuvering aircraft such as bombers and transports.Something more flexible is required when fighter-versus-fighter engagementis anticipated.Fluid FourThe most effective doctrines generally build the division by combiningtwo or more elements of two fighters.Pilots in the division attempt to staytogether during the pre-engagement phase and, when it is practical, to exittogether from hostile airspace. During an offensive attack the elements ofthe division may remain together or they may split for coordinated attacks,but the pilots in each section attempt to stay together. Once the divisionhas been split up, each element of it may operate according to any of thesection doctrines detailed in the previous two chapters. Mutual supportcan also be provided between the elements using double attack or loosedeuce tactics, and there is no requirement that the doctrine employedbetween the elements be the same as that used within each section.As a case in point, consider the example of a four-plane division composedof two sections. Each section might fly welded wing, but the twoelements can cooperate as in double attack. For instance, one section couldattack an enemy formation while the other section provided defensive"top cover/' This combination of fighting wing and double attack doctrinesis commonly known today as "fluid four," and it has been widelyused by many air services from the time it was first introduced by WernerMoelders during the Spanish Civil War, right up to the present.In fluid four doctrine each two-plane section essentially replaces onefighter of the double attack pair. Instead of an engaged fighter and a freefighter, fluid four uses an engaged section and a free section, each flyingfighting wing. With this substitution, virtually everything said aboutdouble attack to this point applies to fluid four, including the offensiveattacks, defensive counters, and engaged maneuvering. Fluid four offersthe obvious advantage over double attack of increased numbers. Thegreater firepower available is especially valuable during an initial attack.The effectiveness of this fluid four doctrine is probably best demonstratedby a four-plane division of U.S. Navy F6F Hellcat fighters led by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!