discoveries. In 2011, a special issue of Astropolitics helped delineate the scope, prospects, andgoals of astrosociology, including research, outreach, and education elements (Hearsey, 2011).Although astrosociology melds different interests, each field brings its own characteristicorganizing concepts and research tools to the table. Anthropologists draw on culture, anamalgam of technology, symbols, and meanings as an organizing and explanatory concept fortheir efforts. Sociologists dwell on societies and their institutions such as government, economy,religion, family, and education. Sociologists are interested in both abstract social structures andprocesses, and in their representations within the individual. Psychologists are interested incognition, emotion, attitudes, behaviors, and interpersonal relationships, among other topics.II.Astrosociology and AstrobiologyAs Jim Pass has demonstrated, astrobiology is a fertile ground for astrosociology (Pass,2011, 2012). Astrobiology is NASA’s program for studying the origins, distribution, and futureof life in the universe. As explained by the historian Steven J. Dick, astrobiology has beenconsistent with the NASA Charter since 1958, and the life sciences, including biology andmedicine, have been prominent in NASA-sponsored research (Dick, 2013; Dick and Strick,2005). One early NASA program – exobiology, the study of life beyond Earth – was built on acombination of physical science (e.g. astronomy, planetary science, and geology) and biologicalscience (e.g. evolutionary biology, microbiology, and genetics). In the late 1990s, astrobiologyemerged at NASA-Ames Research Center (NASA-ARC) in the course of a NASA-widereorganization (Dick and Strick, 2005). This was an exciting era marked by the discovery of thefirst extrasolar planets, rapid progress in genetics including modeling the human genome, andaccelerating searches for extraterrestrial life. The introduction of a NASA AstrobiologyRoadmap presented a new conceptual framework, organizational structure, governing principles,and goals for studying life in the universe (Des Marais et al., 2008). Most importantly, it addedthe social sciences and humanities to the intellectual mix, recognizing that astrobiology hasenormous implications for cultures, societies, and people (Dick and Strick, 2005). A revisedNASA Astrobiology Roadmap was unveiled in 2008, and it is this version that is in force today(Des Marais et al., 2008).a. The Science RoadmapThe NASA astrobiology science roadmap recognizes that astrobiology is amultidisciplinary effort. It encourages keeping Earth and other planets alive and healthy, andpromotes education and outreach to inspire the next generation of scientists and inform thecitizenry (Des Marais et al., 2008). Astrobiology includes not only most or all of “thefundamental questions in biology, physics, and chemistry, but also in philosophy, psychology,religion, and the way in which humans interact with their environment and each other” (Dominikand Zarnecki, 2011: 369). Of course, NASA is not alone in such interests. From its inception,NASA’s Astrobiology Institute (a virtual institute) has included international partners (Dick andStick, 2005). The European Space Agency has a comparable program known as the CosmicVision Plan (Fridlund, 2011). In the UK, the British Interplanetary Society has done much tofurther the interests of space exploration and the search for extraterrestrial life (Macauley, 2012)© 2015 Astrosociology Research Institute12
and the British Royal Society hosted a symposium on astrobiology to help celebrate its 350 thbirthday (Dominik and Zarnecki, 2011).Nobel Laureate Baruch Blumberg heralds astrobiology as a new age of discovery,analogous to that era when adventurers and scientists undertook sea and land-based expeditionsof discovery (Blumberg, 2011). Like James Cook, Alexander von Humboldt, and Lewis andClark, astrobiologists set forth to explore new ground, following in the tradition of past explorerswho sought new routes, scientific discoveries, and material resources. Past exploration was madepossible by ambitious sovereigns and governments, committed visionaries, better ships,improved instruments, high motivation, and developing scientific skills. Many early explorershad spent years studying topics like biology, geology, and meteorology, which allowed them tomake sense of their fresh discoveries. “The sense of wonder,” he adds, “generated by theexplorations of the Age of Enlightenment is also part of contemporary research and exploration”(Blumberg, 2011: 515). Blumberg speaks from experience since he personally traveled to remotefield sites with only the equipment that he could squeeze into his backpack (Dick and Strick,2005).b. The Societal RoadmapAlthough a purely scientific effort, astrobiology applies the theories and methods ofscience to three great existential questions. These are: “Where do we come from?” “Are wealone?” “What will happen to us?” Traditionally these questions have been the province ofphilosophy and theology. Because of astrobiology’s far reaching implications for humanity,NASA’s Astrobiology Roadmap spurred a parallel effort now known as the “societal roadmap”published by Race et al. (2012) in the peer-reviewed journal Astrobiology. This publication is anoutgrowth of interwoven activities including a meeting held in 1999 at the NASA AmesResearch Center (Harrison and Connell, 2001) and a meeting ten years later at the SETI Institute(Race et al., 2012).The 2009 meeting included 43 participants broken into three affinity groups: Philosophyand Ethics, Science and Religion, and Social Sciences. As described in the conference report“Astrobiology and Society: Building an Interdisciplinary Research Community,” the task of the2009 conference was to identify and explore sociocultural issues; invite participation ofhistorians, social scientists, theologians, and humanists in the overall astrobiological enterprise;and encourage dialogue with physical and natural scientists and the public at large (Race et al.,2012). While the societal roadmap is a communal effort independent of NASA, both roadmapsare intended to orient researchers and help them work across interdisciplinary lines. In 2013,societal issues became a focus group within the NASA Astrobiology Institute. The societalroadmap sets five tasks (Race et al., 2012):1. Explore the range and complexity of societal issues related to how life beginsand evolves.2. Understand how astrobiological research relates to questions about thesignificance and meaning of life.3. Explore the relationships of humans to life and environments on Earth.© 2015 Astrosociology Research Institute13
- Page 2 and 3: THE JOURNAL OF ASTROSOCIOLOGYVOLUME
- Page 5: THE JOURNAL OF ASTROSOCIOLOGYVolume
- Page 8 and 9: How is this possible? Consider that
- Page 10 and 11: emarkable parallels and shared insp
- Page 12 and 13: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 14 and 15: demonstrate his strong support for
- Page 16 and 17: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 20 and 21: 4. Explore the potential relationsh
- Page 22 and 23: principles that could account for a
- Page 24 and 25: a. SETISETI, the scientific search
- Page 26 and 27: effects are likely to be based on h
- Page 28 and 29: perhaps brain inaccessible to earth
- Page 30 and 31: Whereas life has not been discovere
- Page 32 and 33: earings in changing environments. A
- Page 34 and 35: Grant, J. (2011). Denying Science:
- Page 36 and 37: Peters, T., and Hewlett, M. (2003).
- Page 38 and 39: celebration and exploration of the
- Page 40 and 41: year, while other events focus arou
- Page 42 and 43: d. Study DesignThis study explores
- Page 44 and 45: iii. Twitter: 2010During the 2010 s
- Page 46 and 47: vii. Twitter: SummaryOver the last
- Page 48 and 49: iv. YouTube: 2012In 2012, the organ
- Page 50 and 51: during the 2011 season. As part of
- Page 52 and 53: v. Facebook: SummaryFor the 2013 se
- Page 54 and 55: Figure 1: Tweet by Mars Curiosity R
- Page 56 and 57: The number of events with websites
- Page 58 and 59: 3002502001501005002001 2002 2003 20
- Page 60 and 61: Meanwhile, other space organization
- Page 62 and 63: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 64 and 65: companion from the planet Saturn. T
- Page 66 and 67: From the Earth to the Moon (1865) a
- Page 68 and 69:
By the late 1920s, concepts of scie
- Page 70 and 71:
von Braun was not merely inspired b
- Page 72 and 73:
spacecraft, and a concept for refri
- Page 74 and 75:
© 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 76 and 77:
practical considerations took prece
- Page 78 and 79:
physiological ones (Suedfeld, 2000
- Page 80 and 81:
Despite numerous anecdotal reports
- Page 82 and 83:
conditions that go beyond those spe
- Page 84 and 85:
Gushin, V. I., and Dudley-Rowley, M
- Page 86 and 87:
© 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 88 and 89:
© 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 90 and 91:
and Earth and the rest of the unive
- Page 92 and 93:
separate from the rest” (Einstein
- Page 94 and 95:
Flight experience has spiritually t
- Page 96 and 97:
is not a construction or a concept;
- Page 98 and 99:
(Pass & Harrison, 2007). Space must
- Page 100 and 101:
Nash, J. (2001). Mayan visions: The
- Page 102 and 103:
© 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 104 and 105:
Board of AdvisorsLynn E. Baroff, M.
- Page 106 and 107:
Editorial ProceduresThe Editor-in-C
- Page 108 and 109:
Figure FormattingAn Author may incl
- Page 110 and 111:
© 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 112 and 113:
• What are the various possible e
- Page 114 and 115:
study the third component of planet
- Page 116 and 117:
• Discuss the details of internat
- Page 118 and 119:
• Discuss studies covering social
- Page 120 and 121:
the Manuscript does not infringe up
- Page 122 and 123:
For the comprehensive list of sugge