physiological ones (Suedfeld, 2000 and 2010; Dator, 2012; Stuster, 1996; Kanas and Manzey,2008).II.The Era of HabitabilityNASA has, in fact, already recognized the need for broadening design parameters toencompass conditions for habitability, and developed the STD-3001 to that end. This documentdefines habitability as “a measure of the degree to which the environment promotes productivityand well-being” (Preiser, 1991, p. 150), entailing three levels which roughly correspond to pastgoals (level one), present goals (level two), and the future goals (level three) of human spaceexploration. The first priority focuses on the safety and health of the crew, which must overrideall else. The second priority emphasizes function and task performance. The third priority citesthe need for physical and psychological comfort and satisfaction. This level includes aspectssuch as personalized spaces, privacy, leisure and recreational activities, and positive socialinteraction. However, despite the inclusion of criteria found in recent human factors research tobe aimed at well-being and comfort, there is little evidence in the current generation of spacehabitat modules that reflect any significant influence by the research (See Figures 3 and 4); onehas only to look at current habitat simulations to see that they still provide only the bare bones,hardly informed by any aesthetic sensibility at all (Vogler and Jorgenson, 2004; Harrison, 2010;Preiser, 1991). Design criteria for habitation are qualitatively very different from those ofexploratory missions. First, habitation implies long-term durations in space, whereas durationsfor missions are short-term. Second, habitability requires more extensive adaptation strategies;short-term missions demand only some degree of physiological adaptation, but long-termdurations demand psychological and social adaptation as well. Third, objectives of explorationentail scientific research and data acquisition; it is the process of searching and discovering, withno final or end destination. Objectives of habitation, on the other hand, require a sense of placeand destination; it is the process of dwelling, of being at home somewhere. Given the substantivedifferences between their respective goals, each must address a distinct set of human factorsissues. The transition from ‘missions to space’ to ‘habitation in space’ requires a shift in thedesign paradigm from what is referred to as the ‘spam in a can’ model to a quality-of-life model(Dudley-Rowley et al., 2003). “Rather than focusing exclusively on how humans endure [in theshort-term]—the criteria for which are based on designing for tolerances—the emphasis hasshifted to how humans thrive [in the long-term]—the criteria for which are based on designingfor optimization” (Lockard, 2014, p.14. Italics are in the original).© 2015 Astrosociology Research Institute72
Figure 3: Habitat Demonstration Unit 3Figure 4: HI-SEAS Mars Habitat Simulation 43 National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Desert RATS 2010 Complete 13th AnnualField Test, original caption – “Desert RATS crew member Dr.Jacob Bleacher works inside theHabitat Demonstration Unit (HDU). The habitat is used for engineering, medical and sciencetesting”, available athttp://www.nasa.gov/images/content/567087main_drats_2011science_hires.jpg.© 2015 Astrosociology Research Institute73
- Page 2 and 3:
THE JOURNAL OF ASTROSOCIOLOGYVOLUME
- Page 5:
THE JOURNAL OF ASTROSOCIOLOGYVolume
- Page 8 and 9:
How is this possible? Consider that
- Page 10 and 11:
emarkable parallels and shared insp
- Page 12 and 13:
© 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 14 and 15:
demonstrate his strong support for
- Page 16 and 17:
© 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 18 and 19:
discoveries. In 2011, a special iss
- Page 20 and 21:
4. Explore the potential relationsh
- Page 22 and 23:
principles that could account for a
- Page 24 and 25:
a. SETISETI, the scientific search
- Page 26 and 27:
effects are likely to be based on h
- Page 28 and 29: perhaps brain inaccessible to earth
- Page 30 and 31: Whereas life has not been discovere
- Page 32 and 33: earings in changing environments. A
- Page 34 and 35: Grant, J. (2011). Denying Science:
- Page 36 and 37: Peters, T., and Hewlett, M. (2003).
- Page 38 and 39: celebration and exploration of the
- Page 40 and 41: year, while other events focus arou
- Page 42 and 43: d. Study DesignThis study explores
- Page 44 and 45: iii. Twitter: 2010During the 2010 s
- Page 46 and 47: vii. Twitter: SummaryOver the last
- Page 48 and 49: iv. YouTube: 2012In 2012, the organ
- Page 50 and 51: during the 2011 season. As part of
- Page 52 and 53: v. Facebook: SummaryFor the 2013 se
- Page 54 and 55: Figure 1: Tweet by Mars Curiosity R
- Page 56 and 57: The number of events with websites
- Page 58 and 59: 3002502001501005002001 2002 2003 20
- Page 60 and 61: Meanwhile, other space organization
- Page 62 and 63: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 64 and 65: companion from the planet Saturn. T
- Page 66 and 67: From the Earth to the Moon (1865) a
- Page 68 and 69: By the late 1920s, concepts of scie
- Page 70 and 71: von Braun was not merely inspired b
- Page 72 and 73: spacecraft, and a concept for refri
- Page 74 and 75: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 76 and 77: practical considerations took prece
- Page 80 and 81: Despite numerous anecdotal reports
- Page 82 and 83: conditions that go beyond those spe
- Page 84 and 85: Gushin, V. I., and Dudley-Rowley, M
- Page 86 and 87: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 88 and 89: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 90 and 91: and Earth and the rest of the unive
- Page 92 and 93: separate from the rest” (Einstein
- Page 94 and 95: Flight experience has spiritually t
- Page 96 and 97: is not a construction or a concept;
- Page 98 and 99: (Pass & Harrison, 2007). Space must
- Page 100 and 101: Nash, J. (2001). Mayan visions: The
- Page 102 and 103: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 104 and 105: Board of AdvisorsLynn E. Baroff, M.
- Page 106 and 107: Editorial ProceduresThe Editor-in-C
- Page 108 and 109: Figure FormattingAn Author may incl
- Page 110 and 111: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 112 and 113: • What are the various possible e
- Page 114 and 115: study the third component of planet
- Page 116 and 117: • Discuss the details of internat
- Page 118 and 119: • Discuss studies covering social
- Page 120 and 121: the Manuscript does not infringe up
- Page 122 and 123: For the comprehensive list of sugge