d. Study DesignThis study explores the utilization of various social media tools to facilitate thedistributed, decentralized organization of these events through three means of analysis: numberand frequency of posts, types of posts created, and responses to the posts by the public. Byanalyzing postings and responses through Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook from December,2007, through May, 2013, this study specifically explores the ability of the Yuri’s Night GlobalExecutive Team to engage the public over the course of a five-plus year period.This is accomplished by first highlighting metrics that can be used to measure the socialmedia engagement of the organization and then by comparing it to a series of success metrics.For the study, we focused on the organization’s Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook use as a metricof social media and used party counts and website visits as metrics of success. Moreover, it isimportant to see how much social media engagement translates into accomplishment of theYuri’s Night mission, which is to increase space awareness overall.Given the difficulty in estimating that outcome, one can measure metrics of successthrough the number or people who attend Yuri’s Night events or otherwise become aware ofYuri’s Night and partake in the organization’s offerings. Since the organization is primarilyconcerned with building awareness of human spaceflight, the increase in the number of peoplewho gain knowledge from the website and the more events held worldwide are both means bywhich to measure greater awareness of the population as a whole.Collection of social media data occurred from August 1, 2007, through July 31, 2013.The data is broken into year-long August 1 through July 31 sets, identified as the 2008 through2013 seasons, and is all publically available from Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook. Theorganization directly provided information regarding the number of Yuri’s Night website viewsand Yuri’s Night events.II.Social Media UseThe first social media tools that Yuri’s Night used were Twitter in 2007, and YouTubeand Facebook in 2009. These three tools are very different from one another in both their reachand their content. Twitter is primarily a means to pass short messages (140 characters or less) toan individual’s (or in this case organization’s) followers. For the most part, a person mustalready be aware of Yuri’s Night in order to follow the messages on Twitter by the organization.Therefore, there are better metrics to examine than simple follower counts. What is moreimportant is how the organization uses Twitter, and how the Twitter community responds to theorganization.YouTube is a different social media tool focused on the sharing of videos. While peoplecan subscribe to the organization on YouTube, the value comes from the views of nonsubscribers,those people who were not aware of the organization and its mission, but found thevideos through other means, such as through web searches or due to videos being shared amongtheir social network. Therefore, we use both the number of views per video as well as identifykey characteristics of videos in order to evaluate if particular styles or types of videos lead todifferent viewership behavioral patterns.© 2015 Astrosociology Research Institute36
Facebook is the most limited of these social media tools as the information posted byYuri’s Night only reaches people already aware of the organization and its mission and theinformation shared there is not found in search engine results. However, Facebook informationcan be easily and quickly disseminated among users who have liked Yuri’s Night on Facebookand have subsequently shared the information within their own social network on Facebook.Within this medium, we want to consider the number of likes various posts get in order todetermine the type of posts the organization’s followers and supporters find most interesting oruseful, as well as to look at which posts get shared the most. This will aid in understanding whatinformation people are most likely to pass along to their social network.a. TwitterTwitter is the social media tool that Yuri’s Night has been using the longest. Theorganization has posted on Twitter with different frequencies over the years and these variationsin usage allow for an examination of community engagement and response. In this section, wefocus on the number of tweets the organization makes, the topics of the tweets, and the responsefrom the Twitter community measured in retweets and mentions.i. Twitter: 2007-2008Yuri’s Night entered the world of social media on December 19, 2007, via Twitter 21when the organization set up its Twitter account and made its first tweet, announcing to otherTwitter users that it was “getting ready to Rock the Planet!” The first 17 tweets focused onpromoting Yuri’s Night 2008, and the next 18 provided a live Twitter feed of the organization’sHouston Event. These initial tweets provide a framework to examine two of the most usefulaspects of Twitter to Yuri’s Night, which are promotion and engagement. Over the next fiveyears, the organization would continue to use Twitter primarily for these two functions.ii. Twitter: 2009For the 2009 season, Yuri’s Night made much more use of Twitter. From August 1, 2008,through July 31, 2009, it tweeted 193 times. This season also led to the first use of retweeting byYuri’s Night. Eighteen of the 193 tweets were retweets of the messages of other people, whichimplies that the organization was paying attention to other Twitter users and becoming moreengaged in the Twitter community. Additionally, the organization’s tweets included 17 mentionsor shout-outs. In the Twitter community, the use of mentions implies that the organization is notjust talking aloud but referencing specific other users. This metric also shows the organization’sengagement with the Twitter community. However, none of the Yuri’s Night’s posts receivedretweets by others. This could be because few people paid attention to what the organization wastweeting about or because they did not characterize the information as significant, and thus didnot share it.21 Yuri’s Night, Twitter post. (2007, December 19, 12:59 p.m.). Retrieved fromhttps://twitter.com/YurisNight/status/515542302.© 2015 Astrosociology Research Institute37
- Page 2 and 3: THE JOURNAL OF ASTROSOCIOLOGYVOLUME
- Page 5: THE JOURNAL OF ASTROSOCIOLOGYVolume
- Page 8 and 9: How is this possible? Consider that
- Page 10 and 11: emarkable parallels and shared insp
- Page 12 and 13: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 14 and 15: demonstrate his strong support for
- Page 16 and 17: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 18 and 19: discoveries. In 2011, a special iss
- Page 20 and 21: 4. Explore the potential relationsh
- Page 22 and 23: principles that could account for a
- Page 24 and 25: a. SETISETI, the scientific search
- Page 26 and 27: effects are likely to be based on h
- Page 28 and 29: perhaps brain inaccessible to earth
- Page 30 and 31: Whereas life has not been discovere
- Page 32 and 33: earings in changing environments. A
- Page 34 and 35: Grant, J. (2011). Denying Science:
- Page 36 and 37: Peters, T., and Hewlett, M. (2003).
- Page 38 and 39: celebration and exploration of the
- Page 40 and 41: year, while other events focus arou
- Page 44 and 45: iii. Twitter: 2010During the 2010 s
- Page 46 and 47: vii. Twitter: SummaryOver the last
- Page 48 and 49: iv. YouTube: 2012In 2012, the organ
- Page 50 and 51: during the 2011 season. As part of
- Page 52 and 53: v. Facebook: SummaryFor the 2013 se
- Page 54 and 55: Figure 1: Tweet by Mars Curiosity R
- Page 56 and 57: The number of events with websites
- Page 58 and 59: 3002502001501005002001 2002 2003 20
- Page 60 and 61: Meanwhile, other space organization
- Page 62 and 63: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 64 and 65: companion from the planet Saturn. T
- Page 66 and 67: From the Earth to the Moon (1865) a
- Page 68 and 69: By the late 1920s, concepts of scie
- Page 70 and 71: von Braun was not merely inspired b
- Page 72 and 73: spacecraft, and a concept for refri
- Page 74 and 75: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 76 and 77: practical considerations took prece
- Page 78 and 79: physiological ones (Suedfeld, 2000
- Page 80 and 81: Despite numerous anecdotal reports
- Page 82 and 83: conditions that go beyond those spe
- Page 84 and 85: Gushin, V. I., and Dudley-Rowley, M
- Page 86 and 87: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 88 and 89: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 90 and 91: and Earth and the rest of the unive
- Page 92 and 93:
separate from the rest” (Einstein
- Page 94 and 95:
Flight experience has spiritually t
- Page 96 and 97:
is not a construction or a concept;
- Page 98 and 99:
(Pass & Harrison, 2007). Space must
- Page 100 and 101:
Nash, J. (2001). Mayan visions: The
- Page 102 and 103:
© 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 104 and 105:
Board of AdvisorsLynn E. Baroff, M.
- Page 106 and 107:
Editorial ProceduresThe Editor-in-C
- Page 108 and 109:
Figure FormattingAn Author may incl
- Page 110 and 111:
© 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 112 and 113:
• What are the various possible e
- Page 114 and 115:
study the third component of planet
- Page 116 and 117:
• Discuss the details of internat
- Page 118 and 119:
• Discuss studies covering social
- Page 120 and 121:
the Manuscript does not infringe up
- Page 122 and 123:
For the comprehensive list of sugge