is not a construction or a concept; rather, it is an experience. It is a connection with somethingprofound outside of ourselves. It transforms how we act, think, and feel. Practices in spiritualitytend to become narcissistic when the ego-self, or an egotistical version of self, is at the center ofthe process by assuming it is the object of the narcissistic fulfillment of the self. If selffulfillmentthrough unification with the cosmos becomes the main ambition of space travel, thenthis unity becomes something to be possessed rather than experienced. It transforms itself intosomething to attain, much like wealth or status. This egocentric spirituality combined with“individual competitiveness and consumer capitalism” results in what is called “spiritualnarcissism” (Ferrer, 2002, p. 36). The achieved and then exclaimed unification could now beperceived as a bloated spiritual persona, one that claims to be further established, advanced andevolved.This leads to an important question. Is unification something we seek to possess in orderto promote a grandiose self, or do we seek it to be a part of something? Fromm (1976) addressesthis desire to possess unification (p. 57-70) and this desire to be a part of something (p. 70-87).He refers to this as the two modes of being. He begins by quoting two poems involving therelationship with an individual and a flower. In the first poem, British poet Tennyson (Fromm,1976, p. 14) sees the flower, admires its existence and then picks it so he may take it home forhimself, but in the process, he evidently kills the flower. In contrast, the Japanese haiku writerBasho (Fromm, 1976, p. 14) recognizes not only the flower’s existence but also his unity with it,therefore leaving it as he first found it. This acceptance of being where “one neither has anythingnor craves to have something, but is joyous, employs one’s faculties productively, is made onewith the world” (Fromm, 1976, p. 16), runs parallel to the unification felt through space travel.However, the individual still does not seem to be satisfied with a ‘mere’ experience ofunity, the experience must be exclaimed and is “consumed and brought back into one unifiedbeing with the self” (Dickens & Ormrod, 2007, p. 138). Astronaut Edgar Mitchell exemplifiesthis in his attempts to rationalize his “ecstasy of unity” through scientific, religious, andphilosophical theorization. If unification is possible through space travel, are we truly capable ofexperiencing it due to our rationalized mindset and our incessant need to seek the truth bydissecting life? Or does our egocentrism indicate that the quest for unity is a product of spiritualnarcissism? Johnson (1976, p. 42) would dispute that unification is feasible at all, if “eachindividual is urged to pursue a personal state of ecstasy” separately. Furthermore, if theimportance of unification may be subject to question, one must look at the benefits it would haveto the entirety of the world. Division causes conflict, and conflict causes strife. The division ofthe world is responsible for countless negative ailments upon our planet and its inhabitants (e.g.,war, the degradation of our environment, and religious conflict). Additionally, to consider thebenefits they have attained from this, one can simply look at those who have achieved thisunification, such as Buddhist monks and astronauts who have experienced the ecstasy of unity.To truly experience this unity, the concept of an ego and self must be abandoned as itimplies a distinct dualism between the cosmos and us, and it is possible that this very dualistideology fuelled the process of disenchantment. Thus, when the individual does ‘experience’unification, the search for unity is no longer there, nor is the seeker there in a very fundamentalsense. That is, based on Katz’s (2007) concept of non-dualism, there cannot be any separationbetween the observed and the observer, so when achieved it results in an amalgamation of both,without subject or object, rather than an awareness of a specific achievement.© 2015 Astrosociology Research Institute90
VII.ConclusionHumans have always held a curiosity towards the cosmos and, as previously argued, havefelt inherently connected to the universe. Moreover, although today we live in a highlyrationalized society, a sense of mysticism permeates through human thought and identity. Theimportance of technology, rationality, and logicality in late modernity highlights a society inwhich scientific understanding is more highly valued than belief – factual knowledge triumphsmysticism and imagination, and Weber’s concept of disenchantment is more applicable to ourmodern day than ever before.The concept of disenchantment illuminates our feelings of separation with the universe,and the binary perspectives from which we view the cosmos unmistakably widens this separationand creates a sense of dualism. The mundane, bureaucratized world we reside in may inspire aquest for re-enchantment, and space travel could be a considerably important outlet for anindividual to experience a sense of wonder and awe, and to regain a feeling of unity. This questfor enchantment could well be elucidated through secondary narcissism, but new-age religions aswell as thematic and phenomenological analyses of astronaut’s experiences of space strengthenan overall sense of a desire for unity, particularly because of the emphasis on ‘feeling’ andacceptance rather than understanding. However, the scientific community is not satisfied with amere “experience of unity”, but seeks unification in theory and some theorists question whetheran experience of unity can exist at all. Nevertheless, science and unification can be compatible ifone takes on a paradigm of new quantum theories, which allows paradoxically for both to bevalid.This discussion has attempted to shed some light on the desire for a sense ofenchantment. Freud’s notion of primary and secondary narcissism is useful in understanding theindividual’s longing for unification and connectedness, and Lasch’s utilization of this concept tothe development of capitalism certainly supplies some insight into the individual’s aspiration toyearn for more. The idea proposed in this argument, that the individual has simply grown wearyof the rationalized world we live in and craves something that is not scientificallyunderstandable, is not an outlandish one. The human race has been trying to achieve unificationand enchantment for centuries through a variety of means such as religion, meditation, andhallucinogens; and now space travel could possibly be another means to achieve this state ofbeing. However the chase for unity and enchantment can not only be viewed as an abandonmentof theorization, secondary narcissism and omnipotence, but also as spiritual narcissism – an egocenteredquest for identity – as one tries to possess the experience rather than accept it.Studying and promoting these feelings of unity experienced in outer space outside ofspacefarer’s traditional contexts (such as religious institutions) has the potential to revolutionizehuman practice by making these experiences and their values the ultimate goals of our society, inturn transforming it to become one with nature and therefore the entire cosmos. If peoplebelieved that unification with the universe is achievable and that institutional and personalboundaries could be demolished, then there may be fewer conflicts between religious and othersocietal groups. Perhaps the answer lies in shedding one’s identity, in changing our perspectiveof how we experience the cosmos, or in spirituality, defined by Evans as a “basic transformativeprocess in which we uncover and let go of our narcissism so as to surrender into the mystery outof which everything continually arises” (Evans, 1993, p. 4). In any case, it would requiresignificant social and cultural change; that is, increased movement toward a spacefaring society© 2015 Astrosociology Research Institute91
- Page 2 and 3:
THE JOURNAL OF ASTROSOCIOLOGYVOLUME
- Page 5:
THE JOURNAL OF ASTROSOCIOLOGYVolume
- Page 8 and 9:
How is this possible? Consider that
- Page 10 and 11:
emarkable parallels and shared insp
- Page 12 and 13:
© 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 14 and 15:
demonstrate his strong support for
- Page 16 and 17:
© 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 18 and 19:
discoveries. In 2011, a special iss
- Page 20 and 21:
4. Explore the potential relationsh
- Page 22 and 23:
principles that could account for a
- Page 24 and 25:
a. SETISETI, the scientific search
- Page 26 and 27:
effects are likely to be based on h
- Page 28 and 29:
perhaps brain inaccessible to earth
- Page 30 and 31:
Whereas life has not been discovere
- Page 32 and 33:
earings in changing environments. A
- Page 34 and 35:
Grant, J. (2011). Denying Science:
- Page 36 and 37:
Peters, T., and Hewlett, M. (2003).
- Page 38 and 39:
celebration and exploration of the
- Page 40 and 41:
year, while other events focus arou
- Page 42 and 43:
d. Study DesignThis study explores
- Page 44 and 45:
iii. Twitter: 2010During the 2010 s
- Page 46 and 47: vii. Twitter: SummaryOver the last
- Page 48 and 49: iv. YouTube: 2012In 2012, the organ
- Page 50 and 51: during the 2011 season. As part of
- Page 52 and 53: v. Facebook: SummaryFor the 2013 se
- Page 54 and 55: Figure 1: Tweet by Mars Curiosity R
- Page 56 and 57: The number of events with websites
- Page 58 and 59: 3002502001501005002001 2002 2003 20
- Page 60 and 61: Meanwhile, other space organization
- Page 62 and 63: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 64 and 65: companion from the planet Saturn. T
- Page 66 and 67: From the Earth to the Moon (1865) a
- Page 68 and 69: By the late 1920s, concepts of scie
- Page 70 and 71: von Braun was not merely inspired b
- Page 72 and 73: spacecraft, and a concept for refri
- Page 74 and 75: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 76 and 77: practical considerations took prece
- Page 78 and 79: physiological ones (Suedfeld, 2000
- Page 80 and 81: Despite numerous anecdotal reports
- Page 82 and 83: conditions that go beyond those spe
- Page 84 and 85: Gushin, V. I., and Dudley-Rowley, M
- Page 86 and 87: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 88 and 89: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 90 and 91: and Earth and the rest of the unive
- Page 92 and 93: separate from the rest” (Einstein
- Page 94 and 95: Flight experience has spiritually t
- Page 98 and 99: (Pass & Harrison, 2007). Space must
- Page 100 and 101: Nash, J. (2001). Mayan visions: The
- Page 102 and 103: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 104 and 105: Board of AdvisorsLynn E. Baroff, M.
- Page 106 and 107: Editorial ProceduresThe Editor-in-C
- Page 108 and 109: Figure FormattingAn Author may incl
- Page 110 and 111: © 2015 Astrosociology Research Ins
- Page 112 and 113: • What are the various possible e
- Page 114 and 115: study the third component of planet
- Page 116 and 117: • Discuss the details of internat
- Page 118 and 119: • Discuss studies covering social
- Page 120 and 121: the Manuscript does not infringe up
- Page 122 and 123: For the comprehensive list of sugge