14.09.2015 Views

Blended Learning

Getting_started_with_blended_learning_guide

Getting_started_with_blended_learning_guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Such questions require two parts:<br />

1. Methods (or Teaching and <strong>Learning</strong> Activities – TLAs) component (that part which comprises the<br />

teaching and learning activities and assessment); and,<br />

2. <strong>Learning</strong> component (that part which comprises the learning that was meant to occur as a<br />

consequence of engaging in the TLAs).<br />

The two parts are joined by a grammatical conjunction; for example:<br />

о о<br />

“The flight simulator session on bad weather landings (TLA component) helped me to learn how to<br />

(grammatical link) land the Boeing 747 in bad weather (<strong>Learning</strong> component).”<br />

оо<br />

Students would then respond to this question using a typical rating scale where for example, 1 =<br />

“strongly disagree” and 5 = “strongly agree”.<br />

Section 2.4<br />

Reviewing (evaluating)<br />

Further resources for designing and conducting student evaluation:<br />

Sample evaluation questions/topics for blended learning:<br />

http://vudat.msu.edu/questions_topics/<br />

Sample online course evaluation survey:<br />

http://www.learningandteaching.unsw.edu.au/content/blended_learning/blended_<br />

resources/survey_online.pdf<br />

GIHE Good Practice Guide for evaluation:<br />

http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/119006/GPG-dev.pdf<br />

Design Focused Evaluation (available online via the Griffith University library catalogue):<br />

Smith, C. (2008). Design-focused evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,<br />

33(6), 631-645.<br />

Principles of student evaluation<br />

The basic principles and guidelines for evaluating courses are relevant no matter what mode of study, year<br />

level, or student cohort.<br />

‣ ¾ Ethics:<br />

оо<br />

оо<br />

оо<br />

‣ ¾ Timing:<br />

оо<br />

оо<br />

Guarantee anonymity – students need to be confident that any written feedback they give is<br />

anonymous;<br />

The right to non-participation – let students know that their participation in the evaluation process<br />

is completely voluntary, and ensure that the process allows for this option;<br />

Procedural integrity – be mindful of the power relationship between you and your students, and<br />

ensure that there is enough “space” or separation between yourself and the collection of feedback<br />

data (this relates to the issue of anonymity).<br />

Timeliness – students tend to give more accurate feedback when the experience is still fresh;<br />

Consider getting feedback early on in the semester, so that you have an opportunity to address any<br />

aspects before it is too late!;<br />

Section 2.4 Reviewing (Evaluating)<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!