Blended Learning
Getting_started_with_blended_learning_guide
Getting_started_with_blended_learning_guide
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Such questions require two parts:<br />
1. Methods (or Teaching and <strong>Learning</strong> Activities – TLAs) component (that part which comprises the<br />
teaching and learning activities and assessment); and,<br />
2. <strong>Learning</strong> component (that part which comprises the learning that was meant to occur as a<br />
consequence of engaging in the TLAs).<br />
The two parts are joined by a grammatical conjunction; for example:<br />
о о<br />
“The flight simulator session on bad weather landings (TLA component) helped me to learn how to<br />
(grammatical link) land the Boeing 747 in bad weather (<strong>Learning</strong> component).”<br />
оо<br />
Students would then respond to this question using a typical rating scale where for example, 1 =<br />
“strongly disagree” and 5 = “strongly agree”.<br />
Section 2.4<br />
Reviewing (evaluating)<br />
Further resources for designing and conducting student evaluation:<br />
Sample evaluation questions/topics for blended learning:<br />
http://vudat.msu.edu/questions_topics/<br />
Sample online course evaluation survey:<br />
http://www.learningandteaching.unsw.edu.au/content/blended_learning/blended_<br />
resources/survey_online.pdf<br />
GIHE Good Practice Guide for evaluation:<br />
http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/119006/GPG-dev.pdf<br />
Design Focused Evaluation (available online via the Griffith University library catalogue):<br />
Smith, C. (2008). Design-focused evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,<br />
33(6), 631-645.<br />
Principles of student evaluation<br />
The basic principles and guidelines for evaluating courses are relevant no matter what mode of study, year<br />
level, or student cohort.<br />
‣ ¾ Ethics:<br />
оо<br />
оо<br />
оо<br />
‣ ¾ Timing:<br />
оо<br />
оо<br />
Guarantee anonymity – students need to be confident that any written feedback they give is<br />
anonymous;<br />
The right to non-participation – let students know that their participation in the evaluation process<br />
is completely voluntary, and ensure that the process allows for this option;<br />
Procedural integrity – be mindful of the power relationship between you and your students, and<br />
ensure that there is enough “space” or separation between yourself and the collection of feedback<br />
data (this relates to the issue of anonymity).<br />
Timeliness – students tend to give more accurate feedback when the experience is still fresh;<br />
Consider getting feedback early on in the semester, so that you have an opportunity to address any<br />
aspects before it is too late!;<br />
Section 2.4 Reviewing (Evaluating)<br />
67