06.12.2012 Views

INDONESIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Indonesia is a multiparty ...

INDONESIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Indonesia is a multiparty ...

INDONESIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Indonesia is a multiparty ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Internet Freedom<br />

<strong>INDONESIA</strong> 15<br />

The government attempted to restrict access to the Internet via the 2008<br />

Information and Electronic Transaction Law. The law, meant to combat online<br />

crime, pornography, gambling, blackmail, lies, threats, and rac<strong>is</strong>m, prohibits<br />

citizens from d<strong>is</strong>tributing in electronic format any information that <strong>is</strong> defamatory,<br />

and pun<strong>is</strong>hes transgressors with a maximum of six years in pr<strong>is</strong>on or a fine of one<br />

billion rupiah ($110,000) or both.<br />

The Min<strong>is</strong>try of Communications and Information Technology requests Internet<br />

service providers (ISPs) block access to pornographic Web sites and other<br />

offensive content. On September 27, the min<strong>is</strong>ter announced restrictions on over<br />

900 Web sites deemed to be connected to violent extrem<strong>is</strong>t groups. The min<strong>is</strong>try<br />

did not have any internal mechan<strong>is</strong>ms to block the Web sites in question.<br />

Enforcement of these restrictions depended upon individual ISPs, and a failure to<br />

enforce these restrictions could result in the revocation of an ISP’s license.<br />

Academic Freedom and Cultural Events<br />

The government generally did not restrict academic freedom; however, there were<br />

continued restrictions on cultural events.<br />

In 2008 the DPR passed an anti-pornography bill. Critics considered its definition<br />

of pornography too broad and feared it could be used to justify attacks on art<strong>is</strong>tic,<br />

religious, and cultural freedom. The bill includes prov<strong>is</strong>ions that allow citizens to<br />

“superv<strong>is</strong>e” adherence to the law. In March 2010 the Constitutional Court ruled<br />

the anti-pornography bill constitutional and not in violatation of the freedom of<br />

religion and expression prov<strong>is</strong>ions of the constitution.<br />

During the year the government-superv<strong>is</strong>ed Film Censorship Institute continued to<br />

censor domestic and imported movies for content deemed pornographic,<br />

religiously offensive, or otherw<strong>is</strong>e offensive. As recently as 2009, the Film<br />

Censorship Institute censored politically sensitive films. Societal pressure led to<br />

self-censorship by some media outlets.<br />

b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association<br />

Freedom of Assembly<br />

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2011<br />

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!