INDONESIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Indonesia is a multiparty ...
INDONESIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Indonesia is a multiparty ...
INDONESIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Indonesia is a multiparty ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Internet Freedom<br />
<strong>INDONESIA</strong> 15<br />
The government attempted to restrict access to the Internet via the 2008<br />
Information and Electronic Transaction Law. The law, meant to combat online<br />
crime, pornography, gambling, blackmail, lies, threats, and rac<strong>is</strong>m, prohibits<br />
citizens from d<strong>is</strong>tributing in electronic format any information that <strong>is</strong> defamatory,<br />
and pun<strong>is</strong>hes transgressors with a maximum of six years in pr<strong>is</strong>on or a fine of one<br />
billion rupiah ($110,000) or both.<br />
The Min<strong>is</strong>try of Communications and Information Technology requests Internet<br />
service providers (ISPs) block access to pornographic Web sites and other<br />
offensive content. On September 27, the min<strong>is</strong>ter announced restrictions on over<br />
900 Web sites deemed to be connected to violent extrem<strong>is</strong>t groups. The min<strong>is</strong>try<br />
did not have any internal mechan<strong>is</strong>ms to block the Web sites in question.<br />
Enforcement of these restrictions depended upon individual ISPs, and a failure to<br />
enforce these restrictions could result in the revocation of an ISP’s license.<br />
Academic Freedom and Cultural Events<br />
The government generally did not restrict academic freedom; however, there were<br />
continued restrictions on cultural events.<br />
In 2008 the DPR passed an anti-pornography bill. Critics considered its definition<br />
of pornography too broad and feared it could be used to justify attacks on art<strong>is</strong>tic,<br />
religious, and cultural freedom. The bill includes prov<strong>is</strong>ions that allow citizens to<br />
“superv<strong>is</strong>e” adherence to the law. In March 2010 the Constitutional Court ruled<br />
the anti-pornography bill constitutional and not in violatation of the freedom of<br />
religion and expression prov<strong>is</strong>ions of the constitution.<br />
During the year the government-superv<strong>is</strong>ed Film Censorship Institute continued to<br />
censor domestic and imported movies for content deemed pornographic,<br />
religiously offensive, or otherw<strong>is</strong>e offensive. As recently as 2009, the Film<br />
Censorship Institute censored politically sensitive films. Societal pressure led to<br />
self-censorship by some media outlets.<br />
b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association<br />
Freedom of Assembly<br />
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2011<br />
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor