06.12.2012 Views

INDONESIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Indonesia is a multiparty ...

INDONESIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Indonesia is a multiparty ...

INDONESIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Indonesia is a multiparty ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>INDONESIA</strong> 23<br />

The Alliance of Independent Journal<strong>is</strong>ts reported no problems for the media in<br />

obtaining unclassified public documents from the government.<br />

Section 5. Governmental Attitude Regarding International and<br />

Nongovernmental Investigation of Alleged Violations of Human Rights<br />

A number of domestic human rights organizations generally operated without<br />

government restriction throughout the country, investigating and publ<strong>is</strong>hing their<br />

findings on human rights cases as well as advocating for improvements to the<br />

government’s human rights performance. The government met with local NGOs,<br />

responded to their inquiries, and took some actions in response to NGO concerns.<br />

However, some government officials, particularly in Papua and Aceh, subjected<br />

the organizations to monitoring, harassment, and interference as well as threats and<br />

intimidation. Activ<strong>is</strong>ts said intelligence officers followed them, took their pictures<br />

surreptitiously, and sometimes questioned their friends and family members<br />

regarding their whereabouts and activities.<br />

Human rights and anticorruption activ<strong>is</strong>ts reported receiving threatening messages<br />

and other intimidation from unknown sources.<br />

The government generally viewed outside investigations or foreign critic<strong>is</strong>m of its<br />

human rights record as interference in its internal affairs. The security forces and<br />

intelligence agencies tended to regard with suspicion foreign human rights<br />

organizations, particularly those operating in conflict areas, and restricted their<br />

movement in these areas. Government monitoring of foreigners occurred in<br />

conflict areas. Some domestic human rights organizations expressed concern<br />

about the possible negative consequences of contacting foreigners. In one case, the<br />

government subjected a foreign researcher for an international human rights<br />

organization to “forced repatriation.” She was conducting research into religious<br />

intolerance in Madura when local authorities detained her.<br />

Government Human Rights Bodies: A number of independent governmentaffiliated<br />

bodies addressed human rights problems, including the National<br />

Ombudsman, the National Comm<strong>is</strong>sion on Violence Against Women (Komnas<br />

Perempuan), and the National Comm<strong>is</strong>sion on Human Rights (Komnas HAM).<br />

The public generally trusted Komnas HAM, Komnas Perempuan, and the<br />

Ombudsman, but government cooperation with their recommendations was not<br />

mandatory and not usual.<br />

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2011<br />

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!