28.09.2015 Views

Empire unusual suggested

TJrwG

TJrwG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36 PASSPORT TO MAGONIA<br />

must have landed—if land it did—unseen, but Mr. Leonard Joliffe,<br />

a dairyman on the farm, reported he heard "a blast one morning at<br />

approximately 6 A.M." 8<br />

On July 23, the London Daily Express was to report that nearly<br />

two weeks earlier, on July 10, Police Constable Anthony Penny<br />

had seen an orange object flash through the sky and vanish near<br />

the Manor Farm field. On the basis of this limited information,<br />

it would seem quite plausible to think that the Charlton crater<br />

was caused by a meteorite. Indeed, when a small piece of metal<br />

was recovered from the hole at the center of the crater, British<br />

astronomer Patrick Moore went to the British Broadcasting<br />

Corporation and stated categorically that the crater had been<br />

caused by a "shrimp-sized meteorite/' crashing down and turning<br />

itself into a very effective explosive. This ended the mystery<br />

as far as the scientific public was concerned. But the true facts of<br />

the matter, as they became known to a few scientists who pursued<br />

the matter further, and to the Army engineers who were in<br />

charge of the investigation, were altogether different.<br />

Farmer Roy Blanchard had sent for the police, who, in turn,<br />

had summoned the Army. Captain John Rodgers, chief of the<br />

Army bomb disposal unit, was the man who conducted most of<br />

the field investigations. His preliminary report indicated that<br />

there were no burn or scratch marks, no trace of an explosion.<br />

And while Captain Rodgers stated that he and his superiors were<br />

baffled, farmer Roy Blanchard mack further disclosures:<br />

There isn't a trace of the potatoes and barley which were growing<br />

where the crater is now. No stalks, no roots, no leaves. The thing<br />

was heavy enough to crush rocks and stones to powder? Yet it came<br />

down gently. We heard no crash and whatever power it uses produces<br />

no heat or noise. 9<br />

Then, on July 19, it was reported that Captain Rodgers had<br />

obtained permission to sink a shaft. The readings obtained were<br />

rather <strong>unusual</strong>. They indicated a metallic object of some size,<br />

deeply embedded. And it was further learned that "detectors behaved<br />

wildly," presumably because the metallic piece in question<br />

was highly magnetic.<br />

At this stage, it should be pointed out, the investigation was<br />

still open and aboveboard, possibly because the Army, rather<br />

THE GOOD PEOPLE 37<br />

than the British Air Ministry, was involved. And the Army Southern<br />

Command public relations officer at Salisbury told Girvan<br />

lli.it the object was recovered from the hole. It was sent to a<br />

British Museum expert and promptly identified as a piece of<br />

common ironstone, "which could be found buried all over Southcrn<br />

England." The British Museum <strong>suggested</strong> that it had been<br />

luiried in the ground for some time, thus eliminating the idea of<br />

;i hoax. And Dr. F. Claringbull, Keeper of the Department of<br />

Mineralogy at the Museum, destroyed the meteorite explanation<br />

;ind, according to the Yorkshire Post of July 27, stated: "There is<br />

more in this than meets the eye." The last word stayed with<br />

Southern Command, however, and it commented wisely: "The<br />

cause of the Phenomena is still unexplained but it is no part of<br />

I lie Army's task to unravel such mysteries."<br />

If we try to summarize what we have learned from these incidents—the<br />

Tully nests, the Ohio ring, and the Charlton crater—<br />

we: can state the following: (1) public rumor associates sightings<br />

nf flying saucers with the discovery of circular depressions on the<br />

ground; (2) when vegetation is present at the site, it exhibits the<br />

nction of a flattening force which produces cither a stationary<br />

pattern ("spokes of a wheel") or a rotating pattern (clockwise<br />

or counterclockwise); (3) some of the vegetation is usually removed,<br />

sometimes with the roots, leaves, etc.; (4) the effect of<br />

a very strong vertical force is often noticed, as evidenced by earth<br />

and plants scattered around the site; (5) strong magnetic activity<br />

has been found in one instance, where common ironstone was<br />

buried close to the center of the depression; and (6) a deep hole,<br />

a few inches in diameter, is often present at the center.<br />

Do I need to remind the reader of that celebrated habit of<br />

the fairies, to leave behind them strange rings in the fields and<br />

prairies?<br />

One Sunday in August, as he wandered over the hills of Howth,<br />

Wcntz met some local people with whom he discussed these old<br />

I ales. After he had had tea with the man and his daughter, they<br />

look him to a field close by to show him a "fairy-ring," and while<br />

he stood in the ring, they told him:<br />

Yes, the fairies do exist, and this is where they have often been

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!