28.09.2015 Views

Empire unusual suggested

TJrwG

TJrwG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110 PASSPORT TO MAGONIA<br />

was sighted "about twenty years ago"—which would take us back<br />

to 1947, a very important year in UFO history.<br />

On June 5, 1968, the press reported that a Buenos Aires couple,<br />

Mr. and Mrs. Vidal, had a very strange adventure while driving<br />

between Chascomus and Maipu. They were surrounded by a thick<br />

cloud of mist and fell asleep. When they woke up, their car was<br />

on a dirt road they did not know, and they found out to their<br />

dismay that they were in Mexico! The paint on their car, a<br />

Peugeot 403, had entirely vanished.<br />

The Vidals went to the Argentine consulate in Mexico, and<br />

from there called some friends of theirs in Buenos Aires to make<br />

arrangements for their return. The consulate has refused to comment<br />

on the incident. The Vidals' car has been taken to the<br />

United States for investigation, and Mrs. Vidal has been hospitalized<br />

in an Argentina clinic, in a state of nervous depression. Fortyeight<br />

hours in the lives of Mr. and Mrs. Vidal cannot be accounted<br />

for.<br />

BEYOND REASON<br />

In the past twenty years, UFO reports have been studied not<br />

only in a sensational light by people with journalistic motives and<br />

methods but also by serious persons who have tried to place them<br />

within the framework of space science, modern physics, psychology,<br />

or the history of superstition. An increasing number of researchers—best<br />

identified with the Flying Saucer Review in Great<br />

Britain and with the groups such as APRO and NICAP 14 in the<br />

United States—have made systematic efforts at responsible datagathering,<br />

at the same time attempting to discover one or several<br />

consistent "patterns" in the reports. But these efforts at rationalization<br />

of the UFO phenomenon have so far failed.<br />

The most appealing of the theories proposed, which would<br />

regard the UFO's as probes from another planet, falls short<br />

of explaining the phenomena in their historical development.<br />

Present-day saucers cannot be evaluated without reference to the<br />

1897 airship or to earlier sightings of similar objects. Then, too,<br />

the theory of simple visitation must be combined with the assumption<br />

that the visitors know far more physics than we do—<br />

TO MAGONIA . . . AND BACK!<br />

so much more, in fact, that an interpretation in terms of physical<br />

concepts known to us is bound to end up in failure and contradiction.<br />

A second major flaw in all the theories proposed so far<br />

is found in the description of the entities and their behavior. Any<br />

theory can account for some of these reports, but only at the<br />

expense of arbitrary rejection of a much larger group.<br />

The recognition of a parallel between UFO reports and the<br />

main themes of fairy-lore is the first indication I have found that<br />

a way might exist out of this dilemma. And although it is still too<br />

early for us to pick up the scattered pieces of our old theories in<br />

a new attempt at explanation, I would like to conclude this chapter<br />

with a more precise review of the most difficult cases we have<br />

before us. Of the "reasonable" sightings there is little that can<br />

be said. The real problem begins when we find witnesses who are<br />

typical of the average population and who tell a story that, though<br />

not inconsistent with the spectrum of UFO reports, still stands<br />

out because of a few specific details that are so unbelievable that<br />

our first reaction is to reject the entire story.<br />

The thought that the story must be disregarded because it is<br />

a challenge to our reason is a reaction I am very familiar with,<br />

and it has led me in the past to select for analysis only those<br />

sightings that seem amenable to scientific criticism. Similarly,<br />

major groups such as NICAP or APRO and the official investigators<br />

working for Project Blue Book have devised some more<br />

or less conscious standards for the automatic rejection of "unbelievable"<br />

stories. To be sure, many of these reports do deserve<br />

the "crackpot" label, but such stories are usually accompanied by<br />

numerous signs of the witness's lack of mental balance. But when<br />

no such psychological context is evident, we must appraise the<br />

story very carefully.<br />

October 12, 1963. It was raining hard between Monte Maiz<br />

and Isla Verde, in Argentina, as Eugenio Douglas drove his truck<br />

loaded with coal along the road. Dawn was coming. Suddenly,<br />

Douglas saw a bright spot on the road ahead, like the headlights<br />

of an approaching vehicle, except that it was a single, blinding<br />

light. To avoid a collision, Douglas slowed down. The light became<br />

so intense he had to lower his head and move to the side.<br />

1 Tc stopped the truck and got out. The light had disappeared.<br />

Ill

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!