Chapter 128

2118 PART 6 ■ Specific Considerations
25. The Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 (England). Local Authority
Social Services Letter (LASSL) 2004. 4. Available at: http://www.
dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Lettersandcirculars/Localauthorit
ysocialservicesletters/AllLASSLs/DH_4074779. Accessed September 22,
2010.
26. Brazier M. The practice of medicine today. In: Brazier M, Cave E, editors.
Medicine, Patients and the Law. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1992:
10:73–93.
27. Williams N, Kapila L. Complications of circumcision. Brit J Surg. 1993;80:
1231–1236.
28. Management of Foreskin Conditions and Male Circumcision. Statement
from the British Association of Paediatric Urologists, the Royal College of
Nursing, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, the Royal
College of Surgeons of England and the Royal College of Anaesthetists.
2007. Available at: http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/media/medianews/statement
onmalecircumcision. Accessed September 22, 2010.
29. Wheeler R. Gillick or Fraser? A plea for consistency over competence in
children. Brit Med J. 2006;8:807–812.
30. Dwyer JG. Parents’ religion and children’s welfare: debunking the doctrine
of parents’ rights. Calif Law Rev. 1994;82:1371–1447.
31. Re J (a minor) (prohibited steps order: circumcision), sub nom Re J
(child’s religious upbringing and circumcision) and Re J (specific issue
orders, Muslim upbringing and circumcision). Federal Legal Rep (1 FLR
571) 2000 and Federal Court Rep (1 FCR 307) 2000. Butterworth’s Med
Law Rev (BMLR). 2000;52:82–96.
32. Re S (children) (specific issue: circumcision). Federal Legal Rep (FLR).
2005;1:236.
33. Simms v Simms. Weekly Law Rep (WLR). 2003;2:1465 and All England
Law Rep (All ER). 2003;1:669.
34. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms (CETS 005). The European Convention on Human Rights.
Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe. Rome (4.IX.1950, TS 71; Cmnd
8969). Human Rights Act 1988. Available at: http://conventions.coe.
int/treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=005&CL=ENG. Accessed
September 22, 2010.
35. The law and ethics of male circumcision—guidance for doctors. British
Medical Association. Available at: http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/
bma2003/. Accessed September 22, 2010.
36. Human Tissue Act 2004. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Available at:
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/pdf/ukpga_20040030_en.pdf.
Accessed: April 21, 2010.
37. Council of Europe. The European Convention on Human Rights and
Biomedicine. Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights
and Biomedicine. On Transplantation of Organs and Tissues of Human
Origin. 2002; Article 14. 2008. Strasbourg, France: European Union.
Available at: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/186.
htm. Accessed: April 21, 2010.
38. McLean SAM. A patient’s right to know. In: Legal Issues in Medicine.
Aldershot: Gower/Darmouth Publishing; 1989. pp. 93–113.
39. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors. All England Law Rep (All
ER). 1985;1:643 HL.
40. Bovine Growth Hormone. 21 September 1982 (VI ZR 302/80) VersR 1982
(1193–1194).
41. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Bioethics. 4th ed. New York:
Oxford University Press; 1994. p. 270.
42. Bolam v Friern. Hospital Management Committee. All England Law Rep
(2 All ER 118) 1957 and Weekly Law Rep (1 WLR 582) 1957.
43. Mason K. Consent to treatment and research in the ICU. In: Ethics and the
Law in Intensive Care. Pace NA, McLean SAM, editors. New York: Oxford
University Press; 1997. p. 38.
44. Maynard v. West Midlands Regional Health Authority. All England Law
Rep (1 All ER 635). 1985.
45. Scarman L. Law and medical practice. In: Byrne P, editor. Medicine in
Contemporary Society. London: King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London;
1987. p. 134.
46. Bolitho v. City and Hackney Health Authority. All England Law Rep
(4 All ER 771). 1997.
47. Giesen D. The patient’s right to know—a comparative law perspective.
Med Law. 1993;12:553–565.
48. Canterbury v. Spence (1972). 464 F2d 772 (DC Cir 1972).
49. Rogers v. Whittaker (HC Australia). Med Law Rev (4 Med LR 79) 1993
50. Edgars J, Morton NS, Pace NA. Review of ethics in paediatric anaesthesia:
consent issues. Paed Anaesth. 2001;11;355–71.
51. Bovine Growth Hormone. (1984) 7 Feb 1984 (VI ZR 174/82) BGHZ 90,
103 (107–108, 111).
52. European Parliament and of the Council of Europe. Directive 2001/20/EC
on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative
provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good
clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products
for human use. J Eur Communities. 2001;April 4:L121–134.
53. The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Amendment (No. 2)
Regulations. Queen’s Printer of Acts of Parliament. United Kingdom. The
Stationery Office Limited; 2006. Schedule 1, Part 4.
54. Evans D, Evans M. A Decent Proposal: Ethical Review of Clinical Research.
Chichester: J Wiley & Sons; 1996. p. 99.
55. Human D, Fluss SS. World Medical Association’s Declaration of
Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human
Subjects. 52nd World Medical Association General Assembly, Edinburgh,
Scotland, October 2000.
56. The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Amendment (No. 2)
Regulations. Queen’s Printer of Acts of Parliament. United Kingdom. The
Stationery Office Limited; 2004. Schedule 1, Part 4.
57. Children’s Act 2004. Amendment of Section 67 of the Children’s Act 1989,
s.2 (7). England: Office of Public Sector Information. 2004.
58. Re R (a minor) (wardship: medical treatment). All England Law Rep (All
ER). 1991;4:184.
59. Alderson P. Competent children? Minors’ consent to health care
treatment and research. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:2272–2283.
60. Redmon RB. How children can be respected as “ends” yet still be used as
subjects in non-therapeutic research. J Med Ethics. 1986;12:77–82.
61. Dworkin G. Legality of consent to non-therapeutic medical research on
infants and young children. Arch Dis Child. 1978;53:443–446.
62. Somerville MA. Therapeutic and non-therapeutic medical procedures—
what are the distinctions? Health Law Can. 1981;2:85–90.
63. S v. S. All England Law Rep (All ER). 1970;3:107, HL.
64. Hull D. Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving
children. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health: Ethics Advisory
Committee. Arch Dis Child. 2000;82:177–182.
65. Institute of Medical Ethics. Medical research with children: ethics, law
and practice. Bull Med Ethics. 1986;14:8.
66. Medical Research Council Ethics Guide. Medical Research Involving
Children. London: Medical Research Council; 2004.
67. Withholding or withdrawing life sustaining treatment in children—a
framework for practice. 2nd ed. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and
Child Health; 2004.
68. Farmer R. “Fetal rights” initiatives concern abortion rights supporters.
National Organization for Women. 2001. Available at: http://www.now.
org/nnt/fall-2001/fetalrights.html. Accessed September 22, 2010.
69. Congress of the United States of America. The Unborn Victims of
Violence Act of 2004. H.R. 1997. Public Law 108–212. March 25, 2004.
70. Rosenburg J. Low birth weight is linked to timing of prenatal care and
other maternal factors. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006; July 31.
71. Center for Reproductive Rights. Punishing women for their behavior during
pregnancy: an approach that undermines women’s health and children’s
interests. New York, NY: Center for Reproductive Rights; 2000;1:71.