07.12.2012 Views

Exchange programmes - IUCN

Exchange programmes - IUCN

Exchange programmes - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Implementation of an <strong>Exchange</strong> Programme for Protected Areas in East Asia<br />

� To develop participants’ skills and confidence in workingin diverse teams within<br />

rural and semi-rural communities to address complex stewardship problems;<br />

� To encourage the practical implementation of the ideas and recommendations<br />

resultingfrom exchanges and case studies; and<br />

� To publicise the results of the programme so that experience and recommendations<br />

can be disseminated widely. (CEI, 2000)<br />

Benefits accrue in three distinct areas:<br />

� The process of proposingand preparingthe case study develops cooperation,<br />

infrastructure and capacity in the host location. Local organisers have to: identify<br />

and convene appropriate representation; agree issues to be addressed; encourage<br />

community participation; plan and share tasks; and fund and manage the logistics<br />

of the team’s visit.<br />

� The interaction between the team and those they meet, culminatingin the public<br />

presentation and the report, articulates and reappraises local concerns, validates<br />

and revitalises existinginitiatives, introduces new ideas and provokes fresh<br />

thinking.<br />

� Workingtogether, under pressure of time and in an unfamiliar context, team<br />

members gain: confidence in applying their own expertise; new understanding of<br />

the breadth and interrelation of responses required in addressingcountryside<br />

issues; new ideas; and new skills in teamworkingand collaboration. For many it is<br />

also a new and powerful experience to work outside their normal formal position<br />

of authority, to an agenda entirely set by local stakeholders and residents, and<br />

many report an increased emphasis on listeningand buildingconsensus as the<br />

most significant positive impact on their working style.<br />

How the programme works<br />

Structure<br />

The transatlantic exchange has managing bodies in the USA and the UK. Participation<br />

from other countries operates through one or other of these bodies. The Glynwood<br />

Center, a non-profit organisation in the USA concerned with training and advice for<br />

rural communities, is the focal point for the <strong>Exchange</strong> Programme in North America.<br />

The Center orchestrates regional support and funding for case studies in North America,<br />

selects the individual host locations, and provides guidance and some financial assistance.<br />

At the same time, it identifies and selects half the team members for case studies in<br />

both North America and the UK.<br />

In the UK there is a national steeringcommittee consistingof representatives of a<br />

group of funding bodies (national and regional agencies and other bodies statutorily or<br />

constitutionally concerned with the countryside, cultural heritage and the rural economy)<br />

and chaired by the Countryside Agency (successor to the Countryside<br />

Commission). This Steering Group sets policy and strategic guidelines and assures core<br />

fundingfor a contracted executingagent, currently CEI Associates Ltd. CEI identifies<br />

case study locations in the UK, guides their development and recruits the other half of<br />

the team members. Thus while there are differences in structure dictated by the respective<br />

national contexts, the key operational axis lies in the close cooperation between<br />

CEI and the Glynwood Center.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!