07.12.2012 Views

Exchange programmes - IUCN

Exchange programmes - IUCN

Exchange programmes - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Implementation of an <strong>Exchange</strong> Programme for Protected Areas in East Asia<br />

Internationally-recognised sites<br />

As an example, we include a short section here on Natural World Heritage sites:<br />

Natural World Heritage sites in East Asia could be targeted in an exchange programme.<br />

Such an exchange could address the range of management issues facing natural and<br />

mixed World Heritage sites within the region, and encourage site managers from World<br />

Heritage sites to work together to find common solutions. The specifics of the project<br />

would need to be developed through further consultation with those responsible for the<br />

management of World Heritage sites in the region, WCPA and the UNESCO World<br />

Heritage Centre.<br />

In terms of potential funding, the United Nations Foundation (UNF) has approved a<br />

Biodiversity Programme framework that specifically targets World Heritage Sites that<br />

contain globally significant biodiversity as priorities from 2000 to 2004. Other funding<br />

sources include the World Heritage Fund and the Japanese International Cooperation<br />

Agency (Environmental Agency of Japan), (Athanas et al., 2001).<br />

Molloy (1999) suggested there was a need for a more strategic approach to consolidate<br />

the management of existing World Heritage sites in China, which has seven natural and<br />

mixed World Heritage sites (listed in Table 3.1). Most sites were listed on the grounds of<br />

criteria iii (outstanding universal value of superlative natural phenomena or exceptional<br />

natural beauty) (UNESCO, 1997). An exchange programme between these sites could<br />

focus on how to maintain scenic values in the face of increasing visitor pressures.<br />

Table 3.1 World Heritage Sites in East Asia<br />

Natural World Heritage Sites<br />

(signatory date)<br />

China (1985)<br />

Huanglong Scenic and Historic Interest Area (S&HIA)<br />

Jiuzhaigou Valley (S&HIA)<br />

Mount Emei and Leshan Giant Buddha<br />

Mount Huangshan<br />

Mount Taishan<br />

Wulingyuan (S&HIA)<br />

Mount Wuyi<br />

Mt. Qincheng/Mt. Dujiangyan Irrigation System<br />

Japan (1992)<br />

Yakushima<br />

Shirakami-Sanchi<br />

Inscription<br />

date<br />

1992<br />

1992<br />

1996<br />

1990<br />

1987<br />

1992<br />

1999<br />

(deferred 2000)<br />

1993<br />

1993<br />

Criteria<br />

N (iii)<br />

N (iii)<br />

NC (iv)<br />

NC (iii, iv)<br />

NC (iii)<br />

N (iii)<br />

N (iii)<br />

NC<br />

N (ii, iii)<br />

N (ii)<br />

Mongolia (1990)<br />

Uvs Nuur Basin (deferred 1999) NC (ii, iii, iv)<br />

Korea (1988) no sites<br />

DPR Korea (1998) no sites<br />

Key: N: natural site; C: cultural site; NC: mixed site.<br />

(i) outstanding examples representing major stages of earth’s history; (ii) outstanding examples representing<br />

significant on-going ecological and biological processes in the evolution and development of terrestrial, fresh<br />

water, coastal and marine ecosystems and communities of plants and animals; (iii) contain superlative natural<br />

phenomena or areas of exceptional natural beauty; and (iv) contain the most significant natural habitats for in situ<br />

conservation of biological diversity; “deferred”: sent back to State Party for revision of nomination.<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!