07.12.2012 Views

Exchange programmes - IUCN

Exchange programmes - IUCN

Exchange programmes - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

success (or failure) of a project they have funded. This may increase the chances of<br />

obtaining future funding from this source.<br />

The partners should also review the need for any future exchanges. If the programme<br />

was a success, then perhaps new partners could be brought into the project, or the project<br />

could be expanded and new funding and funding agencies could be sought. If the<br />

programme was not a success, new plans, involving new partners perhaps, could be<br />

developed after reviewing the apparent reasons for failure. If communication between<br />

the partners ends immediately after the exchange, then it is likely that no future<br />

relationships will develop.<br />

3.2 A strategy for exchange <strong>programmes</strong> in East Asia<br />

The scope and need to develop exchange <strong>programmes</strong> in the East Asia region is<br />

considerable. But there is no single prescription for making this happen. Instead a<br />

strategy is required, which needs to be followed at the level of the individual protected<br />

area, the national and sub-national protected areas system, and region-wide.<br />

The strategy is in four parts:<br />

1. Create a favourable climate for exchanges<br />

2. Develop innovative exchange <strong>programmes</strong> at site, system and region levels<br />

3. Support this with information etc.<br />

4. Secure the funding<br />

Creating a favourable climate<br />

The evidence in this report suggests that a vital ingredient for success is a management<br />

and policy climate that favours exchanges. This needs to be created at the local, national,<br />

and regional levels within East Asia.<br />

Local (site) level<br />

It is appreciated that the authority and resources given to protected area managers will<br />

vary a great deal. In some countries it may be possible to act only at the system level. But<br />

where powers are delegated to the site level, protected area managers should be<br />

encouraged to see exchanges as a potential part of staff development and as an innovative<br />

way to tackle problems that the protected area faces. Ideally site managers<br />

should be allowed some scope to develop a limited number of small-scale, local<br />

exchange <strong>programmes</strong>. The sums of money required can be quite modest, especially if<br />

exchanges are short, local and combined with other previously scheduled events such as<br />

periodic meetings or workshops. Where managers are responsible for drawing up staff<br />

training <strong>programmes</strong>, they should consider exchanges as part of staff development. It<br />

may also be possible to encourage exchanges through the management plan for the<br />

protected areas in question.<br />

National (system) level<br />

Recommendations for protected area exchanges in East Asia<br />

More commonly in many parts of East Asia, the authority to initiate exchanges will be<br />

held by system managers (e.g. heads of parks agencies). They are well placed to help<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!