03.01.2016 Views

Car Ownership? Evidence from the Copenhagen Metropolitan Area

n?u=RePEc:tin:wpaper:20150139&r=dem

n?u=RePEc:tin:wpaper:20150139&r=dem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The choice to focus on <strong>the</strong> location choices of households active on <strong>the</strong> labour and<br />

housing market also implies, that we exclude households where both (or <strong>the</strong> one if single)<br />

members are ei<strong>the</strong>r student, unemployed, retired or o<strong>the</strong>rwise inactive on <strong>the</strong> labour market<br />

(23.8%). 4 There are two reasons for this choice. First of all, we want to examine how households<br />

value and potentially trade-off urban amenities and labour market accessibility when choosing a<br />

residential location. This is only relevant for households active in <strong>the</strong> labour market. Second,<br />

households where both (or one if single) adults are unemployed will rarely be active on <strong>the</strong><br />

housing market – even if this was to improve <strong>the</strong> accessibility to jobs. However, when at least<br />

one of <strong>the</strong> two persons in a retired couple is still active, <strong>the</strong>y are included in our sample (59.2%).<br />

We also include households in which one household member is employed and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r is<br />

studying. In summary, we think that excluding households without a worker <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> estimated<br />

model allows us to focus on <strong>the</strong> most relevant group of household and does not imply substantial<br />

biases.<br />

We distinguish between single earner households (66,012) and dual earners households<br />

(87,330) and estimate separate models for <strong>the</strong>se two groups. The reason for this is that <strong>the</strong>se<br />

household types are quite different in many respects. In Denmark <strong>the</strong> norm for families is that<br />

both adults in <strong>the</strong> household are active in <strong>the</strong> labour market. Families where one of <strong>the</strong> adults is<br />

inactive on <strong>the</strong> labour market for a longer period of time by choice are uncommon.<br />

In some areas we observe only single family housing types (mainly at <strong>the</strong> outskirts of <strong>the</strong><br />

study area) and in some areas only multi-family housing (apartments, in <strong>the</strong> centre of <strong>the</strong> GCA).<br />

There are also areas in which we do not observe single family households with a car, or without<br />

a car. Similarly not all areas have two-earner households without a car, with one car and with<br />

two cars. In case we have no observations of a particular choice alternative we assumed it was<br />

not in <strong>the</strong> choice set of <strong>the</strong> relevant household type. We also model car ownership, i.e. car<br />

ownership for <strong>the</strong> single earner households and car 1-2 for <strong>the</strong> dual earners households. The total<br />

choice set includes 538 and 636 elements for single earner households and dual earners<br />

households, respectively.<br />

4 The majority of <strong>the</strong>se inactive households are pensioners (89.93%).<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!