26.04.2016 Views

AMERICA’S ARMY WINNING IN A COMPLEX WORLD

431298

431298

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Glossary of Terms<br />

ACQUISITION CATEGORIES (ACAT)<br />

ACAT I<br />

ACAT I programs are Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAP)<br />

that are estimated to achieve the statutorily defined MDAP cost<br />

threshold or are designated MDAP by the Army Acquisition Executive<br />

(AAE) or the Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE).<br />

Dollar value: estimated by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,<br />

Technology and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) to require an<br />

eventual total expenditure for research, development, test and evaluation<br />

(RDT&E) of more than $480 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2014<br />

constant dollars or, for Procurement, of more than $2.790 billion in FY<br />

2014. ACAT I programs have two subcategories:<br />

1. ACAT ID, for which the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) is<br />

the USD(AT&L) acting as the DAE. The “D” refers to the Defense<br />

Acquisition Board, which advises the DAE at major decision points.<br />

2. ACAT IC, for which the MDA is the DoD Component Head or, if<br />

delegated, the DoD Component Acquisition Executive (CAE). The<br />

“C” refers to Component; for the Army, the MDA is the AAE. The<br />

DAE designates programs ACAT ID or ACAT IC.<br />

ACAT IA programs are Major Automated Information System (MAIS)<br />

acquisition programs, or programs designated by the USD(AT&L) to<br />

be ACAT IA.<br />

Dollar value: estimated to exceed $40 million in FY 2014 constant dollars<br />

for all expenditures, for all increments, regardless of the appropriation<br />

or fund source, directly related to the Automated Information System<br />

(AIS) definition, design, development and deployment, and incurred in<br />

any single fiscal year; or $165 million in FY 2014 constant dollars for all<br />

expenditures, for all increments, regardless of the appropriation or fund<br />

source, directly related to the AIS definition, design, development and<br />

deployment, and incurred from the beginning of the Materiel Solution<br />

Analysis Phase through deployment at all sites; or $520 million in FY<br />

2014 constant dollars for all expenditures, for all increments, regardless<br />

of the appropriation or fund source, directly related to the AIS definition,<br />

design, development, deployment, operations and maintenance, and<br />

incurred from the beginning of the Materiel Solution Analysis Phase<br />

through sustainment for the estimated useful life of the system.<br />

ACAT IA programs have two subcategories:<br />

1. ACAT IAM, for which the MDA is the DAE or as delegated. The<br />

“M” refers to the Major Automated Information System Review<br />

Council. (Change 4, 5000.2-R).<br />

2. ACAT IAC, for which the MDA is the head of the DoD component<br />

or, if delegated, the CAE. The “C” refers to Component.<br />

ACAT II programs are defined as those acquisition programs that do<br />

not meet the criteria for an ACAT I acquisition program or are programs<br />

designated ACAT II by the MDA. The dollar value is estimated to<br />

require total expenditure for RDT&E of more than $185 million in FY<br />

2014 constant dollars, or for Procurement of more than $835 million in<br />

FY 2014 constant dollars.<br />

ACAT III programs are defined as those acquisition programs that do<br />

not meet the criteria for an ACAT I, an ACAT IA or an ACAT II. The<br />

MDA is designated by the AAE and shall be at the lowest appropriate<br />

level, typically the Program Executive Officer. The estimated costs for<br />

ACAT III acquisition programs are below the thresholds for ACAT II<br />

acquisition programs. ACAT III also includes AIS acquisition programs<br />

that do not exceed the threshold of MAIS acquisition programs.<br />

ACQUISITION PHASE<br />

Each acquisition phase encompasses all the tasks and activities needed<br />

to bring a program to the next major milestone. Each acquisition<br />

lifecycle phase provides a logical means of progressively translating<br />

broadly stated mission needs into well-defined system-specific requirements<br />

and ultimately into operationally effective, suitable and survivable<br />

systems. The acquisition phases for the systems described in this<br />

handbook are defined below:<br />

WEAPON SYSTEMS HANDBOOK 2016 357

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!