26.04.2016 Views

TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS

1Spfyta

1Spfyta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In an interaction program in NHRC held in early 2013, a Government Advocate from the Offie of the<br />

Attorney General – Mr. Krishna Ghimire - argued that there is need a seprate act for witness<br />

protection, and cooperation and coordianton act. He also claimed that it has been established in<br />

jurispurundence that no decisions of the courts shall be influenced by whether or not the case<br />

become hostile or absent of the witness.<br />

6.4 Judicial Responses of Trafficking<br />

The Share of Trafficking Cases – Table 6.1 shows the number of trafficking cases registered in<br />

Supreme Court, Appellate Courts and District Courts of Nepal in FY 2013/14 vis-à-vis the total<br />

number of cases in the courts. A total of 1,007 trafficking cases were registered in the courts –<br />

accounting for less than one percent of the total cases in the courts of Nepal (Table 6.1).<br />

Table 6.1 Share of trafficking persons cases to the total cases in the courts of Nepal, FY 2013/14<br />

Courts<br />

Total cases in the<br />

courts<br />

Number of cases of trafficking in<br />

persons<br />

% share of cases of<br />

trafficking in persons<br />

Supreme Court 20,353 215 1.1<br />

Appellate Courts 28,997 206 0.7<br />

District Courts 109,349 586 0.5<br />

Total 158,699 1,007 0.6<br />

Source: MoWCSW, 2072 (2015) Yatra Bulletin Fourth Number.<br />

The Supreme Court – In FY 2012/13, the Supreme Court of Nepal has ordered the GoN to revise the<br />

Human Trafficking and Transportation (Control) Act 2007, particularly in the following areas:<br />

• Amend the Section 15 (6) and make a law that if a person who gives the statement in the<br />

court at the beginning changes the statement latter or if a person is not cooperating with<br />

the court, such person shall be imprisoned.<br />

• Make compulsory arrangement to provide the information to the victims about the details<br />

of Police investigation or prosecution.<br />

• Establish the Compensation Fund for the victims who are granted compensation under the<br />

Section 17 and allocate budget compulsory from the FY 2013/14 and provide the<br />

compensation to the victims immediately after the decision of the courts through the<br />

concerned Police Offices.<br />

• Make compulsory budget arrangement for the expenditure required to appear in the court<br />

to the witnesses of the Government cases and provide such money through the concerned<br />

Police Offices.<br />

• Pay the expenditure incurred for attending the court to a witness of the Government cases<br />

before the witness attending in the court.<br />

• Arrange the security to the victims and informats as per Section 26 of the Act through the<br />

concerned Police Offices.<br />

• On July 31, 2013, the Supreme Court issued the order to the MoHA, OAG and Registrar of<br />

the Supreme Court for the arrangement of continious hearing of the serious nature of the<br />

crimes such as trafficking and rape.<br />

Table 6.2 shows the levels and trends of trafficking crime cases registered and disposed by the<br />

Supreme Court of Nepal from FY 2009/10 to FY 2013/14. A 5-year average number of the trafficking<br />

cases registered in the Supreme Court come out to be 77 and the 5-year average number of<br />

trafficking cases decided by the Court is 15. The convention rate ranges from 20 percent in the FY<br />

2010/11 to 57 percent in the FY 2011/12 and the five-year average conviction rate comes out to be<br />

33 percent only. On the other hand, the pending rates are very high in each Fiscal year, especially<br />

after FY 2011/12.<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!